Revision as of 21:35, 6 January 2016 edit 134.217.237.30 (talk) →‎Lambda calculus: What does the arrow mean? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:41, 8 January 2016 edit undo 134.217.237.30 (talk) →‎Math StackExchange post to help clarify lambda/combinator sections: new section Next edit →
Line 713: [[User:Thepigdog\|Thepigdog]] ([[User talk:Thepigdog\|talk]]) 02:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC) == Math StackExchange post to help clarify lambda/combinator sections == I've opened a math.stackexchange question to attempt to understand Curry's paradox better; specifically, the article's explanation of how the paradox can be formulated using combinators or lambda calculus don't make sense to me (see the section on lambda calculus above). http://math.stackexchange.com/q/1602611/52057 [[Special:Contributions/134.217.237.30\|134.217.237.30]] ([[User talk:134.217.237.30\|talk]]) 17:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Curry's paradox: Difference between revisions