Content deleted Content added
→top: clean up, typo(s) fixed: However → However, using AWB |
|||
Line 1:
{{
[[Image:Mittelafrika2.PNG|right|thumb|Approximate location of Mittelafrika in medium blue and dark blue, with pre-existing German colonies in dark blue. Possible inclusions (Portuguese colonies) are shaded light blue.]]
[[Image:Mittelafrika.png|right|thumb|Alternative planning in 1918, including the takeover of French colonies in Western and Central Africa]]
Line 6:
German strategic thinking was that if the region between the colonies of [[German East Africa]] ([[Rwanda]], [[Burundi]], and [[Tanzania]] minus the island of [[Zanzibar]]), [[German South-West Africa]] ([[Namibia]] minus [[Walvis Bay]]), and [[Cameroon#Colonization|Cameroon]] could be annexed, a contiguous entity could be created covering the breadth of the African continent from the [[Atlantic Ocean|Atlantic]] to the [[Indian Ocean]]. Given the richness in natural resources of the [[Belgian Congo]] alone, this region would accrue considerable wealth to the colonising power through the exploitation of natural resources, as well as contributing to another German aim of economic self-sufficiency.
The concept dates back to the 1890s, when then [[Chancellor of Germany (German Reich)|Chancellor of Germany]], [[Leo Grav von Caprivi|Leo von Caprivi]], gained the [[Caprivi Strip]] in the [[Heligoland–Zanzibar Treaty]]. This addition to German South-West Africa attached the colony to the [[Zambezi River]]. [[United Kingdom|British]] and German imperialists competed over the region which now comprises [[Zimbabwe]], [[Zambia]], and [[Malawi]]. [[Cecil John Rhodes|Cecil Rhodes]], on behalf of the British, successfully colonised the latter region (named [[Rhodesia (disambiguation)|Rhodesia]], after Rhodes). Germany also discussed with Britain for them to press their ally, [[Portugal]], to cede the colonies of [[Angola]] and [[Mozambique]] to them. The British however, had preferential trade agreements with Portugal, who was a trusted ally, and though plans for an eventual partition of the Portuguese colonies were drawn, Britain would thus see its colonial position in Africa severely weakened in case they were applied, since the Germans could then effectivelly threaten their Cairo to Cape lines of communication. These plans were arguably made only to be used only as a last resort to appease Germany in case she threatened to disrupt the balance of power in Europe. However, since German foreign policy interests were in subsequent years mainly directed at gaining mastery in Europe itself, and not in Africa, they were eventually shelved. Indeed, as it is likely that German concepts of a "Mittelafrika" were designed to put pressure on Britain to tolerate growing German dominance in the European continent, and not the other way around, colonial concessions would never placate the German Empire, as surely British politicians came to realise at the time.
Germany's aspirations in Mittelafrika were incorporated into Germany's aims in World War I insofar as Germany expected to be able to gain the Belgian Congo if it were to defeat [[Belgium]] in Europe. The full realisation of Mittelafrika depended on a German victory in World War I in the [[European theatre of World War I|European theatre]], where Britain would be forced to negotiate and cede its colonies in Rhodesia to Germany when faced with a German-dominated Europe across the [[English Channel]]. In the course of the actual war, German aspirations in Mittelafrika were never matched by events in the [[African theatre of World War I|African theatre]]. The German colonies were at very different levels of defence and troop strength when the war began in Europe, and were not in a position to fight a war due to a lack of material.
| |||