Content deleted Content added
Line 87:
::If "harassment" is suggesting that you can be unblocked immediately once some formalities are attended to, then OK. [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 09:27, 20 May 2016 (UTC).
:::How kind of you to imply that I am mounting a campaign against Salim Mehajer. No, please - do go on! I mean, I'm a deceitful bastard who never contributed anything around here. But you're an
:::I mean, there's an appeal at the moment and why am I being banned? Why, I think that would be because of one sentence! One fucking sentence! But no, ''I'm'' the bad faith editor here, not the editor who took the whole section out. But what is this I see in the article? Why, that would be my text and sources, largely unchanged but without the one sentence! Oh my goodness, consensus at last. Except that would have been fine - if that's what had happened to me, but it fucking didn't now, did it? No, ALL of my material was taken out, even the stuff about how Mehajer nearly killed the two women in Lidcombe. But oh no! I am one of Murdoch's evil lackeys. I evidently must be doing the will of the dark lord himself, I mean I've ''cleverly covered my tracks'' by citing ''Yge Sydney Morning Herald'' and ''The Guardian''. The level of deceipt met astound you. Truly News Corp has trained me well, and their partisan right wing tentacles have infected the left-leaning Tbsdy into helping them wage a campaign of hatred against the innocent Mehajer!
:::So, you've caught me out. My dastardly attempt to write an article has been caught just in time. My crime of content writing has been purged from the wiki, but maybe, just maybe you can surely save me? If I promise to discuss edits on the talk page, ensure that I never contest a CSD ever again, make sure that my edits only ever revert vandalism and ensure that content is not produced in an accurate or honest way then I can yet be redeemed!
| |||