Ambivalent prejudice: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m clean up, replaced: The Annals Of The American Academy of Political and Social Science → The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science using AWB
m →‎Ableism: Journal cites: remove proxy URL, using AWB (12009)
Line 54:
 
===Ableism===
Söder suggests that people do not have fixed cognitive assumptions or emotions about people with [[Disability|disabilities]].<ref name=Soder1990>{{cite journal |last= Söder|first= Mårten|date= 1990|title= Prejudice or Ambivalence? Attitudes Toward Persons with Disabilities|url= http://www.tandfonline.com.ezproxy.library.uwa.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1080/02674649066780241|journal= Disability, Handicap & Society|publisher= |volume= 5|issue= 3|pages= 227–241|doi= 10.1080/02674649066780241|accessdate=}}</ref> Rather, people are ambivalent, so their behavior in any given situation will depend on the context. People have two contrasting ideas about people with disabilities; people devalue disabilities while maintaining a benevolent sympathy towards disabled people.<ref name=Soder1990/> This leads to a conflict between basic values held by wider society and moral dilemmas in concrete daily interactions with people with disabilities. Söder proposes an ambivalence model as a better method for evaluating interactions with and attitudes about disabled people as it better captures the totality of people's sentiments.<ref name=Matsuo2005/>
 
===Immigrants===