Content deleted Content added
rating |
→A new Gödelian argument: new section |
||
Line 11:
:Mechanical philosophy, as you say, "is a term for an aspect of the [[scientific revolution]] of [[Early Modern]] Europe". But this article was about mechanism which goes back to ancient Greece. Most of the links are pointing to [[Mechanism (philosophy)]] and only two pointing to [[Mechanical Philosophy]]. Maybe spin off [[Mechanical philosophy]] (which has plenty of links) into a separate article? —[[User talk:Machine Elf 1735|<span style="text-shadow:#00FADE 0.05em 0.05em 0.07em;white-space: nowrap;font-family: Fraktur, Mathematica6, Georgia, sans-serif">Machine Elf <sup style="font-size:75%;font-family: Georgia, sans-serif">1735</sup></span>]] 00:32, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
== A new Gödelian argument ==
I agree that the Gödelian anti-mechanist arguments proposed thus far failed, but I offer a new one which I think is free of such flaws, after my careful study of the foundations of mathematics: http://settheory.net/godel-mind-machines [[User:Spoirier|Spoirier]] ([[User talk:Spoirier|talk]]) 17:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
| |||