Health 2.0: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
m clean up, remove url redundant with pmid, remove accessdate if no url, Report bugs, errors, and suggestions at User talk:CitationCleanerBot
change link
Line 41:
== Overview ==
[[File:Swan Health 2.0 model.jpg|thumb|A model of Health 2.0]]
Health 2.0 refers to the use of a diverse set of technologies including [[Connected Health]], [[electronic medical records]], [[mHealth]], [[telemedicine]], and the use of the Internet by patients themselves such as through [[blog]]s, [[messageboardsInternet forum]]s, online communities, patient to physician communication systems, and other more advanced systems.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Caldwell|first=Aya|last2=Young|first2=Anna|last3=Gomez-Marquez|first3=Jose|last4=Olson|first4=Kristian R.|date=2016-08-01|title=Global Health Technology 2.0|journal=IEEE pulse|volume=2|issue=4|pages=63–67|doi=10.1109/MPUL.2011.941459|issn=2154-2317|pmid=21791404}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Antheunis|first=Marjolijn L.|last2=Tates|first2=Kiek|last3=Nieboer|first3=Theodoor E.|date=2013-09-01|title=Patients' and health professionals' use of social media in health care: motives, barriers and expectations|journal=Patient Education and Counseling|volume=92|issue=3|pages=426–431|doi=10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020|issn=1873-5134|pmid=23899831}}</ref> A key concept is that patients themselves should have greater insight and control into information generated about them. Additionally Health 2.0 relies on the use of modern cloud and mobile-based technologies.
 
Much of the potential for change from Health 2.0 is facilitated by combining technology driven trends such as Personal Health Records with social networking —"[which] may lead to a powerful new generation of health applications, where people share parts of their electronic health records with other consumers and 'crowdsource' the collective wisdom of other patients and professionals."<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Traditional models of medicine had patient records (held on paper or a proprietary [[computer system]]) that could only be accessed by a physician or other [[Health profession|medical professional]]. Physicians acted as gatekeepers to this information, telling patients test results when and if they deemed it necessary. Such a model operates relatively well in situations such as acute care, where information about specific blood results would be of little use to a [[Laity|lay person]], or in general practice where results were generally benign. However, in the case of complex chronic diseases, [[Mental illness|psychiatric disorders]], or diseases of unknown etiology patients were at risk of being left without well-coordinated care because data about them was stored in a variety of disparate places and in some cases might contain the opinions of healthcare professionals which were not to be shared with the patient. Increasingly, [[medical ethics]] deems such actions to be [[Paternalism|medical paternalism]], and they are discouraged in [[Medicine|modern medicine]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Bassford|first=H. A.|date=1982-01-01|title=The justification of medical paternalism|journal=Social Science & Medicine (1982)|volume=16|issue=6|pages=731–739|issn=0277-9536|pmid=7089608|doi=10.1016/0277-9536(82)90464-6}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=McCullough|first=Laurence B.|date=2011-02-01|title=Was bioethics founded on historical and conceptual mistakes about medical paternalism?|journal=Bioethics|volume=25|issue=2|pages=66–74|doi=10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01867.x|issn=1467-8519|pmid=21175709}}</ref>