Talk:Bill Walker (American politician)

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RadioKAOS (talk | contribs) at 02:53, 7 September 2022 (Is there a reason why you're reverting to the old pagenames of these templates? Talk header was moved in 2009 and WPBS was moved in 2016.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 4 years ago by Rontrigger in topic Needs updating

Clarification/reality check

Walker was not popularly elected as mayor of Valdez, but rather elected by the city council. The City of Valdez is administered by a manager, meaning that this was strictly a ceremonial position. Walker has admitted such himself, while acting as if people shouldn't be bothered by such details. In other words, he's bought into the same mentality as everyone else that all he needs to do is throw out "mayor", and that we're supposed to take "mayor" at face value and get all wet and gooey inside from hearing the word and not dig any deeper. Additionally, like with Scott McAdams in Sitka, Walker doesn't exactly rank very high within the context of notable mayors. He served during the same era as Walt Day, George Gilson, John Kelsey and Steve McAlpine. That's just one particular era; Valdez has also had such notables as Tony Dimond, John Devens and John Harris serve as mayor. It may be necessary for you to look beyond current headlines and other media hype to understand what I'm saying here. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 04:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for that information. I was not aware of that. (Does that mean Sarah Palin wasn't voted mayor of Wasilla by the citizens but by the city council too?) There's a lot about Alaska politics I don't know, and I tried to go by reliable sources as best I could, though they can often be wrong. Any more info on that would be great. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
"Wet and gooey inside"? Seriously? RadioKaos, you might have made this distinction without being snarky about it. One of several comments in your post that are such. Your larger point is valid here, but be welcoming, and polite. Thanks!Juneau Mike (talk) 17:04, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply
TBH I didn't even see that phrase in the mound of text. At least I don't think I did, or I probably would've replied differently. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:11, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion

There is was a move discussion in progress on Talk:Omar Ahmad (American politician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

The issue was whether to rename Bill Walker (American politician) to Bill Walker (U.S. politician). The result was no consensus to move. 67.100.127.30 (talk) 19:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bill Walker (American politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Infobox

We may have to keep an eye on Bill Walker (American politician), as there's an editor arguing that Walker is the 13th governor. The individual keeps removing the numbering :) GoodDay (talk) 02:25, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

30 missing years

Did really nothing of note happen to this man between 1980 and 2010? --Golbez (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A lawyer with emphasis on municipal law. That's the key, particularly the passage contained in the above source which states "The firm is a general practice with emphasis in oil and gas and municipal law. Bill represents many Alaskan municipalities as well as serving as general counsel to the Alaska Gasline Port Authority". AGPA is central to his years of behind-the-scenes political activity prior to 2010. Sorry if you've decided that it's not worth mentioning, perhaps it really isn't if it hasn't resulted in anything actually being built. It's really more a case of AGPA pre-existing Wikipedia and therefore not dominating today's headlines like most of the garbage that gets dumped around here these days. It does explain his association with Jim Whitaker and what appears to be a quixotic effort to push a gas pipeline. I say "quixotic" because of the unfavorable economic factors and the fact that we heard "the gas pipeline is coming any day now" back when I was in elementary school in the 1970s. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 00:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
@RadioKAOS: Are you talking to me, with "Sorry if you've decided that it's not worth mentioning"? Because that's the exact opposite of what I said. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:43, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bill Walker (American politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Needs updating

Folks, this article seriously needs updating with regard to the 2018 election. There is no mention of Walker's original plan to seek re-election, that he and Mallott were planning to run again as an independent ticket, or even the general-election result, with Mike Dunleavy winning election as Walker's successor. Rontrigger (talk) 19:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply