Undescribed

Joined 14 November 2009

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Undescribed (talk | contribs) at 22:53, 5 March 2023 (Cyclone Gabrielle: Reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 1 year ago by Undescribed in topic Cyclone Gabrielle

This is my talk page, you can post any comments you have below this line...§§§§§§§§§§

A page you started (1996 Kamianske tram accident) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 1996 Kamianske tram accident, Undescribed!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is a very informative article. For me, it looked as if the brakes had only failed at the bottom of the hill, although I assume that the break failure had already occured before, resulting in the excessive speed.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Saffir–Simpson scale

Sorry about my mistake! I didn't see the 18 system limit! In addition, Hurricane Rick is pretty recent and therfore shouldn't we remove the more older ones like Hurricane Alice (1954) or so? Layah50♪ 2:20 June 1, 2022 (UTC)

@Layah50: Generally we try to put a couple of storms from each decade. Kind of spread them out so to speak. --Undescribed (talk) 06:34, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I see, thank you! Layah50 (talk) 11:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Weather: Map Dot & Template/Infobox Colors

Dear project member, This message is being sent out to encourage new ideas and feedback on those proposed in regard to the colors debate for WikiProject Weather. For those who are unaware of what's been happening over the last year, I will give a brief summary. We have been discussing proposed changes to the colors of the dots on tropical cyclone maps and templates and infoboxes across the entire weather project in order to solve issues related to the limited contrast between colors for both normal vision as well as the various types of color blindness (MOS:ACCESS). We had partially implemented a proposal earlier this year, however, it was objected to by a number of people and additional issues were presented that made it evident this wasn't the optimal solution. We tried to come up with other solutions to address the issues related to color contrast, however, none of them gained traction and no consensus was generated.

We need your help and I encourage you to propose your own scale and give feedback on those already listed. Keep in mind that we are NOT making a decision on any individual proposal at this time. We are simply allowing people to make proposals and cultivate them given feedback from other project members. Please visit our project page for additional details. The proposal phase will close no later than December 31st at 23:59 UTC. NoahTalk 03:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cyclone Gabrielle

Hi can you please give a source that all the missing are accounted for? Thank you F (talk) 22:42, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't have a specific reference that states that all are accounted for, but further down in the article it states that the well-being of the missing persons is not being questioned, meaning that they would not be added to the fatality count. So there is no reason for it to be listed in the infobox section imo. Undescribed (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply