Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/March 23

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for making suggestions or discussing improvements to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/March 23.

To report an error when this list is currently on the Main Page, see Main Page errors. Please remember that this list defers to the supporting articles, so it is best to achieve consensus and make any necessary changes there first.
Before making a suggestion, please read the selected anniversaries guidelines. Please remember that this list usually defers to supporting pages when there is disagreement, so it is best to achieve consensus and make any necessary changes there first.
To discuss improvements to the corresponding March 23 article, see Talk:March 23 instead.

Frequently asked questions

Q1: Why is [Insert event here], an event that is "more important and significant" than all the others that are currently listed, not posted?: A1: Relative article quality along with the mix of topics already listed are often deciding factors in what gets posted. Any given day of the year can have a great many important or significant historical events. The problem is that there is generally only room on the Main Page to list about 5 events at a time, so not everything can be posted.

As stated on Wikipedia:FAQ/Main Page, the items and events posted on the Main Page are chosen based more on how well they are written, not based on how much important or significant their subjects are. It is easier for admins to select a well-written, cited, verifiable article over a poor one versus trying to determine objectively how much a subject is important or significant.

Keep in mind that the quality requirements only apply to the selected bolded article, not the other links. Thus, an event may qualify for multiple dates in a year if there is an article written in a summary style and an article providing detailed content; if one of those pages have cleanup issues, the other page can be bolded as an alternate.

Another criterion is to maintain some variety of topics, and not exhibit, just for example, tech-centrism, or the belief that the world stops at the edge of the English-speaking world. Many days have a large pool of potential articles, so they will rotate in and out every year to give each one some Main Page exposure. In addition, an event is not posted if it is also the subject of this year's scheduled featured article or featured picture.

Q2: There are way too many 20th-century events listed. Why aren't there more events from the 19th century and before?

A2: The short, basic reason is the systemic bias of Wikipedia. There are not enough good, well-written articles on 19th-century and earlier events for all 365 days in the year. Currently, a majority of users seem to be generally more interested in writing articles about recent events. If you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.

Q3: This page seems to be biased toward events based in [Insert country or region here]. What can be done about it?

A3: This again is attributed to the systemic bias of Wikipedia. Many users are generally more interested in working on good, well-written articles pertaining to their home country. Since this is the English Wikipedia, there will be more English-speaking users, and thus more articles pertaining to English-speaking countries. And if there are more users who are from the United States, there will probably be more well-written articles about events based in the United States. Again, if you would like to further help mitigate the systemic bias in Wikipedia, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias.

Q4: Why is the birthday/death anniversary of [Insert name here] not listed?

A4: There are only four slots available for birth and death anniversaries. As with the events, article quality and diversity in time period, geography, and reason for notability are all contributing factors in whether an article gets selected for inclusion.

Q5: Are the holidays/observances listed in any particular order?

A5: Yes, there is a specified order: International observances first, then alphabetically by where observed.

Q6: Some of the holidays/observances that are listed have dates in parentheses beside them. What do they mean?

A6: There are two reasons that some holidays/observances have dates next to them:

Non-Gregorian-based holidays/observances are marked with the current year as a reminder to others that their dates do in fact vary from year to year.
National Days, Independence Days, and other holidays celebrating the nationhood of a country are generally marked by the year of the significant historic date being observed.

Today's featured article for March 23, 2025
Wikipedia:Today's featured article/March 23, 2025 create – talk – watch
Picture of the day for March 23, 2025
The featured picture for this day has not yet been chosen. In general, pictures of the day are scheduled in order of promotion to featured status. See Wikipedia:Picture of the day/Guidelines for full guidelines. create

← Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/March 22 * Wikipedia talk:Selected anniversaries/March 24 →

The link for Tanker should be modified to Tanker (ship) for disambiguation.--Jfurr1981 04:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

who is Natalie Halford?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

re: births: 1991 - Natalie Halford, Indescribeable

nice girl i'm sure —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.167.203.15 (talk) 02:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

2012 notes

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New articles (unused): Texas City Refinery explosion
Omitted: Theriso revolt; Bhagat Singh; Sierra Leone Civil War; Deorbit of Mir
Included: Give me Liberty, or give me Death! (3rd appearance, last in 2010); William Cargill (first appearance); Cold fusion (first appearance); 2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel (3rd appearance, last in 2010)
Repeats: War of the Pacific (2nd consecutive appearance, 2 total)

—howcheng {chat} 08:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

2013 notes

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Moved to Ineligible: Texas City Refinery explosion (maintenance)
Omitted: Give me Liberty, or give me Death! (ineligible—maintenance); William Cargill; War of the Pacific; Cold fusion; 2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy personnel
Included: William McGregor (football) (2nd appearance, last in 2006; 125th anniversary); Durham Stevens (first appearance); Lahore Resolution (4th appearance, last in 2010; rescued from Ineligible); Strategic Defense Initiative (3rd appearance, last in 2010; 30th anniversary); Sierra Leone Civil War (2nd appearance, last in 2011)

—howcheng {chat} 06:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

2014 notes

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rescued from Ineligible (unused): Give me liberty, or give me death!
Omitted: William McGregor (football); Durham Stevens; Lahore Resolution; Strategic Defense Initiative; Sierra Leone Civil War
Included: Trần Dynasty (first appearance; rescued from Ineligible); First Battle of Kernstown (first appearance); Theriso revolt (2nd appearance. last in 2011); United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (first appearance); Cold fusion (2nd appearance. last in 2012; 25th anniversary)

—howcheng {chat} 08:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The following should be on this date:

1889 - The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community was founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in British India.

Protected edit request on 23 March 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

1889 - The Ahmadiyya Muslim community was founded by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in British India.

I think is is one of the more relevant and better pages that should be added. Many Thanks! --Peaceworld 09:23, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. — {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 15:55, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply