This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Gekritzl(talk | contribs) at 14:45, 19 December 2014(Christ myth theory help). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 14:45, 19 December 2014 by Gekritzl(talk | contribs)(Christ myth theory help)
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hello, RicWatts! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Allecher (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
I am contacting you because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants.
Could you help us to modify a WP page to bring it to a more fair and balanced state? The "Christ myth theory" article has been hopelessly controlled by Christians who seem desperate to bring skepticism about the historicity of Jesus down to the level of a childish cult or something - they have even tagged the article with categories. " I made a number of copy edits, and added some authors to the Books section, and user User:TMDrew reverted every last one under the excuse "The authors mentioned are not respected scholars in this field" - clearly a violation of WP guidelines. I reverted, then user User:Bill the Cat 7 reverted my edit. I reverted his, he reverted with rationale "Then put them back in without that part. Also, it is a FACT that there is almost universal consensus."
Anyway, your help would be greatly appreciated in combatting obstinate contributors like that who do not follow guidelines - please help.14:45, 19 December 2014 (UTC)