This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Castle Hackett article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Notability
Lucas, please read the available sources before claiming that this doesn't have notability. There are enough sources quoted in the article already to pass the notability guidelines, and, as I said in my edit summary when I removed the notability tag, there are loads of sources (277 of them) available here that confirm notability. These aren't just web sites, they are real paper books that write about the subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
Phil- you should know that the mere existence of a term in a source does not qualify as notable. Not all books in Google Book search meet the standards of a 'reliable source' - Some of the sources you quote, you only get a snippet view, how can you dig deeper to ensure
The larger fact remains - why is this important? No where in the article does the article come close to meeting these standards. Lucas20 (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2009 (UTC)