Talk:2014 aluminium alloy

Chemistry Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Metalworking Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Bold textThis is now the top result for "2014 aluminium alloy" in Google, so needs a lot of work. Jamesx12345 (talk) 21:24, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

2014-Dec-1: FYI, 2014A is not the same thing as 2014. The Wilson Metals link spells this out in the second paragraph. Going to try to fix this page up. Magicka81 — Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

It appears that the second last line of the composition (max limit) refers to titanium + ZIRCONIUM, i.e. Ti + Zr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.76.112.14 (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Inconsistency

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

2014 chemical composition is inconsistent, it says:

Titanium: 0.15% max
Titanium + Zinc: 0.2% max
Zinc: 0.25% max

How Zinc is 0.25% when the Ti+Zi is 0.2% max? That is not possible. Shouldn't Zinc be marked as 0.2% max instead? I checked some websites, and I think it might be Titanium + Zirconium being 0.0-0.20%. It references BS EN 573-2:2009 spec. But that I think is for 2014A, not 2014. 81.6.34.246 (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply