Talk:Particle Man

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scribblerman (talk | contribs) at 00:15, 8 October 2020. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Latest comment: 3 years ago by Scribblerman in topic Strong Similarity with The Fool's Rainbow Man (1969)
WikiProject iconSongs Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconSpoken Wikipedia
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

Original research

Agreed, except for the one about Terry Pratchett. That one is rather specific and is *probably* not speculation. Thus, I just put it back in with a citation tag on it, until someone can verify for sure. Mucus 15:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Spiderman?

"Spiderman, Spiderman, does whatever a Spider can" "Particle Man, Particle man, doing the things a particle can" Isn't it kind of a reference? Maybe? I dunno


I'd say that's a serious reach. Particle man is sui generis.

I don't think it's a reach at all; many people I've asked said they immediately thought of Particle Man when they heard the Spiderman line. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.48.163.61 (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that's a fairly logical inference. It shouldn't be included without a reference from a reliable source, however. --BDD (talk) 17:56, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Triangle Man

US Government...Executive, Legislative, Judicial
Particle Man: Uranium
Universe Man: God

I had always heard: Triangle Man = Christianity (trinity) Particle Man = Science (Christianity smacking around Gallileo, et al.) Universe Man = Deism (watchmaker, hands-off theory of a deity- Thomas Jefferson, for example) Person Man = Secular humanists (Also smacked around by Christianity) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.48.163.61 (talk) 21:18, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Strong Similarity with The Fool's Rainbow Man (1969)

Having just listened to the 2020 LP Behind the Dykes, a great compilation of Dutch 60s pop, Rainbow Man by The Fool (Side B, track 10) would appear to be a source for Particle Man. Check it out here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xtJeMZ7AQA ... at 0:54 when the song kicks in. I think this should be mentioned in the article here. Thoughts? Scribblerman (talk) 00:15, 8 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


Meaning of the song

I seem to recall at some point being told that the person/people who wrote this song didn't have any particular meaning in mind... If anyone can track down an official source for this staement, it might be important. (Personally, the song always reminded me of the Mega Man games, but that's probably a lot less important...) --Scrounge 03:32, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greek Philosophy

Since Person Man lives in a garbage can, wouldn't Diogenes of Sinope be a more suitable influence? And Pythagoras for Triangle Man? Or is this Post-Modernism gone too far?Mon Vier 16:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Particle man.jpg

 

Image:Particle man.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Particle man.jpg

 

Image:Particle man.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:24, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Interpretation

I changed the interpretation title to cultural references as I believe it fits better, discuss Banime 18:35, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

He's got a watch with a minute hand, a millennium hand, and an eon hand...

I think it's important to point out that the song goes on to state state: "when they meet, it's happy land". A happy event/place occurring on the scale of the entire universe should not be left out of a discussion of the song. It's important to note that Universe man did not stand up for person (smaller) man. This casts a pall over the entire song, characterizing the universe as an indifferent force. 66.67.236.248 (talk) 03:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Silent Hill 2 "reference"

One could add a pretty popular, albeit crudely drawn Youtube music video showing similarities between the four persons described in "Particle Man" and characters from the video game Silent Hill 2. The video can be found here. The characters are as follows: Particle Man is Walter, Triangle Man is Pyramid Head, Universe Man is Eddie and Person Man is James. They fit surprisingly well, actually.91.67.221.191 (talk) 22:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think that particle man=scientists universe man-God and person man=Hobos Triangle man= The US government


The  USA screws everybody accept god hes unscrewable  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.187.155.31 (talk) 18:19, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply 

Incorrect reference

The reference number 4 (Ricks, Rosy. "They Might Be Giants at the Pabst—Oh, Boy". Third Coast Digest. 2011-10-30. Prime 7 Media.) is used twice in this article, while the second use is as citation for specific description of a video clip ("It also portrays Universe Man as being just as mean as Triangle Man towards Particle Man, despite what the lyrics suggest."), yet none of that information can actually be found in the cited article. The closest it gets is the mere mention of using wrestler imagery by the artists ("It was an early taste of things to come with No Means No and beyond, teaching scientific concepts of mass using wrestlers."), which doesn't even talk about the particular clip mentioned in the Wiki article at all! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.100.108.177 (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2020 (UTC)Reply