Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zydus Wellness

Zydus Wellness

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure WP:PROMO, Qualifies WP:ADMASK. Again a highly sub-standard article created by M4DU7 without imparting any encyclopedic value of the article. (Similar page has been marked for AfD, by me) Hence, calling for an AfD. Kindly note; all such kind of sub-standard articles are reviewed by a "New Page Patroller"... on what basis? God Knows. - Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:26, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A large WP:LISTED FMCG company. Nothing about the article is promotional in nature. Other editors are more than welcome to improve this "substandard" article. The nominator has marked it as a paid article... On what basis? God knows. M4DU7 (talk) 04:54, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
NOTE: This vote is added by the creator of the article. - Hatchens (talk) 12:18, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: May be a listed company but the current content is extremely limited in scope and does not warrant an entire article at this point of time. The content can be moved to a section in the parent company's article. Prolix 💬 13:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have expanded the article a bit with more references. Just to add to my earlier vote, this is a ~US$2 billion market cap company which owns household brands like Complan, Sugar Free, Glucon D, EverYuth and Nycil, some of which are market leaders in India. The references prove that it passes NCORP, CORPDEPTH and GNG. M4DU7 (talk) 04:53, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I appreciate the cleanup and additional references. I also don't read the promotional tone referenced above.--Concertmusic (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~KEEP: meets the SIRS test The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2020 (UTC)~~ — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs). [reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 17:43, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]