User contributions for 46.126.76.193

11 December 2012

• 22:2722:27, 11 December 2012 diff hist +513 Beta Hydri →A planetary system?: not confirmed (Zechmeister et al. 2012)

25 November 2012

• 11:1511:15, 25 November 2012 diff hist +4 HR 8799 seems these sections belong with the planetary system discussion

24 November 2012

• 07:4607:46, 24 November 2012 diff hist +477 User talk:Ilvon →Upsilon Andromedae c/d: new section
• 07:4407:44, 24 November 2012 diff hist +31 Upsilon Andromedae d this looks like an RV minimum mass rather than the astrometrically-derived true mass
• 07:4307:43, 24 November 2012 diff hist +281 Talk:Upsilon Andromedae d →Mass in the infobox: new section
• 07:4107:41, 24 November 2012 diff hist +83 Upsilon Andromedae c any reference for calling this object a star?
• 07:4007:40, 24 November 2012 diff hist +31 Upsilon Andromedae c dubious mass in the infobox - looks like a RV minimum mass rather than the astrometric true mass
• 07:3907:39, 24 November 2012 diff hist +294 Talk:Upsilon Andromedae c →Mass in the infobox: new section
• 07:2707:27, 24 November 2012 diff hist +76 Upsilon Andromedae →Planetary system: why use radial velocity minimum masses when the (very different) true masses are available?
• 07:2707:27, 24 November 2012 diff hist +565 Talk:Upsilon Andromedae →Masses in the planet table: new section

17 November 2012

• 20:2320:23, 17 November 2012 diff hist −146 Kappa Andromedae →Planetary system: needs a real citation - a link to a nonexistent arXiv paper is not sufficient
• 09:5309:53, 17 November 2012 diff hist −2 HD 40307 do not need to capitalise the super, and do not need scare quotes either

13 November 2012

• 23:3623:36, 13 November 2012 diff hist +1,221 Talk:Gliese 667 →Planet Irradiance for user ref, not for use in article: there's a discrepancy in the stellar radius and the luminosity values used for the calculations

27 October 2012

• 09:3209:32, 27 October 2012 diff hist +384 Talk:Fomalhaut b →Confirmed: not so fast - dust cloud hypothesis is still viable

24 October 2012

• 21:5221:52, 24 October 2012 diff hist +1,086 Talk:Alpha Centauri Bb →Habitable Zones of Binary Star Systems: Underwood, Jones and Sleep (2003) interpolations for the interested, but really this isn't very relevant here

23 October 2012

• 23:2823:28, 23 October 2012 diff hist +427 Talk:Alpha Centauri →Bacteria?: response
• 23:2523:25, 23 October 2012 diff hist +1,203 User talk:Cliff12345 →Re: Alpha Centauri Edit: new section
• 20:1820:18, 23 October 2012 diff hist −9 Alpha Centauri it certainly isn't too hot for the plasma unicorns that dance in the fusion core of the Sun, but I made those up. Any references for a viable form of life that operates at 1500 K?

21 October 2012

• 17:3617:36, 21 October 2012 diff hist 0 HD 28185 b reference shows planet is closer to inner edge of the HZ than the outer
• 17:3517:35, 21 October 2012 diff hist +925 Talk:HD 28185 b →Inner Part of Habitable zone, I don't think so.: wrong
• 12:0312:03, 21 October 2012 diff hist +643 Talk:Kepler-16b →Query page title: should not be using the hyphen

20 October 2012

• 21:1121:11, 20 October 2012 diff hist +10 Alpha Centauri →Planets: semi-amplitude is not eccentricity
• 20:1120:11, 20 October 2012 diff hist 0 HIP 13044 b not a proper noun
• 20:1120:11, 20 October 2012 diff hist −4 HIP 13044 hot Jupiter is not a proper noun
• 20:0920:09, 20 October 2012 diff hist +30 HIP 13044 b it's not a red giant
• 18:2018:20, 20 October 2012 diff hist −85 Alpha Centauri Bb restore semi-amplitude removed by mistaken editor
• 18:2018:20, 20 October 2012 diff hist +438 Talk:Alpha Centauri Bb →Orbital elements, semi-amplitude: wrong, semi-amplitude is the observable
• 13:0713:07, 20 October 2012 diff hist +1 Alpha Centauri →Confirmed planet: rename section to "Alpha Centauri Bb" - planet is not confirmed yet
• 12:2512:25, 20 October 2012 diff hist +418 Talk:Alpha Centauri →Bacteria?: no way
• 12:1912:19, 20 October 2012 diff hist −55 Alpha Centauri The reference given does not mention any form of life, microbial or not.

12 October 2012

• 18:1418:14, 12 October 2012 diff hist +587 Talk:55 Cancri e →Formation theories: response
• 06:5206:52, 12 October 2012 diff hist +226 55 Cancri e radius is compatible with being a carbon planet - it is not known to be one

11 October 2012

• 19:1719:17, 11 October 2012 diff hist +744 Talk:55 Cancri e →Carbon planet speculations: new section

9 October 2012

• 20:2120:21, 9 October 2012 diff hist −7 Sagittarius A* →Central black hole: correct eccentricity of S0-102 orbit: value given was for S0-104 (different star)
• 20:2020:20, 9 October 2012 diff hist +17 S55 (star) fix orbital elements: 0.988 is the value for S0-104 (different star)
• 20:1020:10, 9 October 2012 diff hist +542 Talk:4 Ursae Majoris →Requested move #2: new section

8 October 2012

• 22:5122:51, 8 October 2012 diff hist +450 Talk:Terrestrial planet →Extrasolar terrestrial planets: new section
• 22:3022:30, 8 October 2012 diff hist +183 S55 (star) flagged dubious V-band magnitude and variability type

6 October 2012

• 21:0721:07, 6 October 2012 diff hist +237 Talk:Sagittarius A* →Shortest-period orbit: new section

25 September 2012

• 19:1119:11, 25 September 2012 diff hist −32 38 Arietis not a supergiant
• 17:4917:49, 25 September 2012 diff hist +290 Talk:82 G. Eridani →Survey: common usage vs correctness

24 September 2012

• 20:2320:23, 24 September 2012 diff hist +230 Talk:Hawaii →Inconsistency in spelling?: thanks :-)
• 19:5819:58, 24 September 2012 diff hist +461 Talk:Buôn Ma Thuột →Requested move: → Buon Ma Thuot: is there actually an accessibility issue?
• 19:5019:50, 24 September 2012 diff hist +1,194 Talk:82 G. Eridani No edit summary
• 19:0019:00, 24 September 2012 diff hist +487 Talk:Hawaii →Inconsistency in spelling?: not asking about whether or not to use diacritics, but in the case that diacritics are used, what should that diacritic be?
• 17:5717:57, 24 September 2012 diff hist +550 Talk:Hawaii →Inconsistency in spelling?: new section

22 September 2012

• 16:5316:53, 22 September 2012 diff hist +62 HD 181068 disputed categorisation of stars as "red giant" and "red dwarfs"
• 16:5316:53, 22 September 2012 diff hist +642 N Talk:HD 181068 →Red giant, red dwarfs?: new section

18 September 2012

• 20:5720:57, 18 September 2012 diff hist +173 Talk:Gliese 581 →Gliese 581g officially confirmed: well that didn't take long...

14 August 2012

• 20:1620:16, 14 August 2012 diff hist +466 Talk:Pluto →Edit request 2012-08-14: new section