|
* If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents|Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]].
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:List of policies|policies and guidelines]], and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. ''Per [[WP:TR]]''<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> [[User:Bilorv|'''Bilorv''']] <sup>[[User talk:Bilorv|(Talk)]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Bilorv|(Contribs)]]</sub> 12:56, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
== Ace Combat redlink discussion ==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Ace Combat]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br>
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''.
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and '''breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|block]]'''.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. <!-- Template:uw-ew -->
Look, if you’re not willing to even discuss this, then please stop reverting it. I’ve given my argument, which is in line with Wikipedia policy. Now it’s your turn. And calling my attempts at communication a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eaglestorm&diff=656395001&oldid=656122220 “desperation play”] is just disingenuous. Wikipedia works through collaboration. You must be willing to do that. —[[Special:Contributions/174.141.182.82|174.141.182.82]] ([[User talk:174.141.182.82|talk]]) 17:26, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
:Assuming that you simply don’t ''use'' Talk pages… you should probably avoid making potentially controversial edits to WIkipedia, especially reversions of other users’ edits. If you disagree with another editor, just move on. Otherwise, you could easily get yourself blocked when a simple conversation could have completely avoided it. {{pb}} Anyway, at [[Talk:Ace Combat]], there are now two other editors in support of the redlink, and they don’t know your reasoning, either. Please either respond (there, here, my Talk page, anywhere) or leave it be. —[[Special:Contributions/174.141.182.82|174.141.182.82]] ([[User talk:174.141.182.82|talk]]) 19:07, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
| 