Content deleted Content added
Arianewiki1 (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 461:
::::Primefac is absolutely right. Please do stop this incorrect use of disambiguation notices for page deletions. With the [[Supernova]] page, clearly 'stellar explosion' is a general simplification to account for the great plethora of differing mechanisms and outcomes. I.e. "A supernova is a type of stellar explosion." Absolute fact. Is there a more fundamental or simpler definition?
::::As for saying 'astronomical event' is also a simplification for the Introduction. The reasoning appears here[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Supernova&diff=763305224&oldid=752354096], and I have explained in full my edits. Both these statements were chosen very carefully to counteract the continuous unnecessary edits (mostly by either novices or unregistered users) and make the page stable. Furthermore, if you do wish to change this, you must discuss it on the Talkpage, and also need to gain consensus to do so. (So far, you have not engaged with this adopted policy of basic editing processes.) Thanks. [[User:Arianewiki1|Arianewiki1]] ([[User talk:Arianewiki1|talk]]) 00:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
::::: I dont want to change the structure. I just like the ability to surf wikipedia (and the fact links label the text for AI training). The more links the better. Can't we have a way of prioritizing or deprioritizing, if they think there is such a think as 'overlinking' ... imagine if links to disambiguations & lists were displayed in a different (less obtrusive) shade - like they're just there for navigation [[User:Fmadd|Fmadd]] ([[User talk:Fmadd#top|talk]]) 01:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
|