Tekleni

This user has moved on. He is not here.

Archives
15 September 2006 – 11 October 2006 11 October 2006 – 31 October 2006 31 October 2006 – 11 November 2006

Re: BHRM

Everything shall be included, if that's what others want... Also, see my comment in Template talk:Turkic-speaking. Δεν υπάρχει περίπτωση να είμαι "πολιτικά ορθός"... Ξαφνικά ζητάνε 'Βουλγάρικη μειονότητα'... Μετά την "Μακεδονική", Τουρκική, Ρουμανική, Αλβανική, Roma, κτλ... Ίσως να μιλήσουν και για Σερβική, Γκαγκαουζική (the laters were considered Greeks by the Turks, and now they claim them as "Orthodox Turks", huh?!), Αραβική ή μειονότητα των Elves... I will do the same, if they insist... and be sure that i can source it... What they give, is what they get... Full stop! Hectorian 03:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

TRNC

In my opinion, that's ok. E104421 17:09, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Alright. Cheers E104421

Sockpuppets?

If, as you claimed, User:Craig Thomasian and User:Hamparzoum are both sockpuppets, then why did Craig Thomasian actually notify Hamparzoum about the Armenia poll (User talk:Hamparzoum)? I think it's clear that Craig Thomasian is a real user. Walton monarchist89 10:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

thank you

thank you for the transl. --VKokielov 02:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

Hello, Tekleni, this is just a reminder that your comments are appreciated at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Transnistrian referendum, 2006. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you! Flcelloguy (A note?) 01:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Cooperation board launched

A new (and overdue) Greek and Turkish cooperation and notification board has been launched here. Stop by, have a look and sound off! Cheers! Baristarim 07:19, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Location Maps

On the WikiProject Countries talk page, you had either explictly declared a general interest in the project, or had participated at a discussion that appears related to Location Maps for European countries.
New maps had been created by David Liuzzo, and are available for the countries of the European continent, and for countries of the European Union exist in two versions. From November 16, 2006 till January 31, 2007, a poll had tried to find a consensus for usage of 'old' or of which and where 'new' version maps. At its closing, 25 people had spoken in favor of either of the two presented usages of new versions but neither version had reached a consensus (12 and 13), and 18 had preferred old maps.
As this outcome cannot justify reverting of new maps that had become used for some countries, seconds before February 5, 2007 a survey started that will be closed at February 20, 2007 23:59:59. It should establish whether the new style maps may be applied as soon as some might become available for countries outside the European continent (or such to depend on future discussions), and also which new version should be applied for which countries.
Please note that since January 1, 2007 all new maps became updated by David Liuzzo (including a world locator, enlarged cut-out for small countries) and as of February 4, 2007 the restricted licence that had jeopardized their availability on Wikimedia Commons, became more free. The subsections on the talk page that had shown David Liuzzo's original maps, now show his most recent design.
Please read the discussion (also in other sections α, β, γ, δ, ε, ζ, η, θ) and in particular the arguments offered by the forementioned poll, while realizing some comments to have been made prior to updating the maps, and all prior to modifying the licences, before carefully reading the presentation of the currently open survey. You are invited to only then finally make up your mind and vote for only one option.
There mustnot be 'oppose' votes; if none of the options would be appreciated, you could vote for the option you might with some effort find least difficult to live with - rather like elections only allowing to vote for one of several candidates. Obviously, you are most welcome to leave a brief argumentation with your vote. Kind regards. — SomeHuman 7 Feb2007 20:38 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kgligorov.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Kgligorov.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 02:49, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dorotheus of Athens for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dorotheus of Athens is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorotheus of Athens until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Natg 19 (talk) 01:52, 26 July 2023 (UTC)