Felicia777
|
|
It's in her book.
editI really don't appreciate being accused of printing "defamatory" comments when the characterization in question is directly based on Davidson's published work. If you are going to remove my edit, please do so on legitimate grounds. 184.146.209.113 (talk) 22:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
IP
editI've reported them to AIV. If you get anything like that again just report them straight away. Knitsey (talk) 22:46, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- God bless you. I don't tolerate personal attacks. Felicia (talk) 22:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Have you asked for tp protection? Knitsey (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I left a message on an admin's talk page. Felicia (talk) 23:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I will ask at the page protection page for you. It might be quicker. Knitsey (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have protected for a day; keep in mind that the threshold for protecting user talk-pages is much higher than for normal protections: see WP:UTPROT. I have also have revision deleted 2 edits by the IP; if they vandalise again, please report to WP:AIV...it's more more effective to block than to protect. Lectonar (talk) 10:57, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I left a message on an admin's talk page. Felicia (talk) 23:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
- Have you asked for tp protection? Knitsey (talk) 22:57, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
why removed my edits on Bluefish?
editHi Felicia,
why did you revert my edits on Bluefish? I discussed those with user BlauweVis who is the most active editor on this article, and he was OK with it?
kind regards, Fortysix46 (talk) 09:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
Draft:All Seniors Foundation
editWP:A7 is not suitable for drafts. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the information. Felicia (talk) 21:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy tagging
editYou tagged Draft:Keroseno y Finito as WP:G1. The tag is incorrect for this page; have you read what the criterion says? I deleted the article, but on my own per WP:G11. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I only have a very limited understanding of Spanish, thus the incorrect tag Felicia (talk) 15:52, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- There are free translators available, but if you can't translate a page, then you shouldn't tag it for G1, which specifically excludes non-English pages.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
edit- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
Deleted page
editHi, I created a draft of a page to outline a novel, which I run a fan group regarding. There was no advertising on the page, but I had not yet placed the necessary sources on the page. I realise that the page may have needed some editing and changes to conform to Wikipedia's standards, which is fine, but it was not promotional or advertising in any way, it was simply a run-down of a published novel as per many other examples on Wiki. The page was marked for speedy deletion and has now been removed. I wonder if this could be reconsidered, please? LittleBassingtonFans (talk) 15:19, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- It was deleted by an admin for the exact reason that I tagged it. Felicia (talk) 15:24, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can I appeal this? There was zero promotion on the page and it was ungenerous of you to have tagged it without speaking to me. LittleBassingtonFans (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
- @LittleBassingtonFans, if you want to appeal the decision, you should contact the deleting administrator (in this case, Seraphimblade). @Felicia777, if someone asks you about how to appeal speedy deletion, please do not ignore them. -- asilvering (talk) 13:12, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Can I appeal this? There was zero promotion on the page and it was ungenerous of you to have tagged it without speaking to me. LittleBassingtonFans (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 September 2024
edit- News and notes: WikiCup enters final round, MCDC wraps up activities, 17-year-old hoax article unmasked
- In the media: AI is not playing games anymore. Is Wikipedia ready?
- News from the WMF: Meet the 12 candidates running in the WMF Board of Trustees election
- Wikimania: A month after Wikimania 2024
- Serendipity: What it's like to be Wikimedian of the Year
- Traffic report: After the gold rush
Please don't tag drafts that have never been submitted for speedy deletion as promo. We can hardly say that a draft is exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten
if its author hasn't even finished writing it in the first place. (The one I just declined now contains far more unflattering content than anything promotional.) And if they have finished, and simply not submitted it, it will be deleted six months after the last edit as WP:G13 anyway. -- asilvering (talk) 13:23, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2024
edit- In the media: Courts order Wikipedia to give up names of editors, legal strain anticipated from "online safety laws"
- Community view: Indian courts order Wikipedia to take down name of crime victim, editors strive towards consensus
- Serendipity: A Wikipedian at the 2024 Paralympics
- Opinion: asilvering's RfA debriefing
- News and notes: Are you ready for admin elections?
- Recent research: Article-writing AI is less "prone to reasoning errors (or hallucinations)" than human Wikipedia editors
- Traffic report: Jump in the line, rock your body in time
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
edit- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
edit- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
The Signpost: 18 November 2024
editArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
edit
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)