Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirna Khayat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:15, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mirna Khayat

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This music video producer doesn't seem to be notable. The article hasn't cited any sources since it was created in 2007 and nothing about her comes up in a WP:BEFORE. Except for a single trivial book mention. There are a few sources cited in the Arabic article about here, but they seem to be extremely trivial coverage also. There definitely doesn't seem to be the multiple in-depth reliable sources about her that the article would need to pass WP:GNG or WP:NBIO. Adamant1 (talk) 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article is sourced only to the subject's website. Wikipedia is not meant to be a directory to web content.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 23:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep An Arabic search shows that there is extensive coverage of her in multiple independent sources over many years. Most of what comes up in a Google book search is magazine articles going back to 2002 in snippet view only, but there’s plenty of other coverage. Examples: 1, 2, 3, 4. Mccapra (talk) 04:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Mmm ... as far as Mccapra's sources go, they are all namedrops and casual mentions. The first one is all of three sentences long; the third one namedrops her in a single sentence as praising a children's production. The second is a photo caption, and the fourth is two sentences long. Nothing actually provides significant coverage of the subject. Ravenswing 11:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Actually ‘mmmmm’ was my first reaction too. I agree there’s not much depth here, but equally, they aren’t just namedrops either. The first three articles are explicitly about her, though brief, or otherwise name her in the headline. It’s not the strongest case I’ve seen for keep, but that’s where I’ve landed with this. Mccapra (talk) 12:04, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

10:48, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.