Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Macliver

Sara Macliver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for BLP sourcing issues since 2020. Not clear that the subject passes WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Monophile Which of the sources are both independent and have significant coverage? What am I missing here? I am not seeing even one source that is both independent and has in-depth coverage.4meter4 (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
1234567 [https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/aria-celebrates-fine-arts-1404980/amp/ Billboard charts89 Monophile (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source Significant? Independent? Reliable? Secondary? Pass/Fail Notes
"Directory Search Results". directory.uwa.edu.au.  N  Y  Y  ?  N Broken url, but its a directory listing with no attributed author. Unclear if it is a secondary source of information. Lacks in-depth coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
Ryan, Gavin (2011). Australia's Music Charts 1988–2010 (PDF ed.). Mt Martha, Victoria, Australia: Moonlight Publishing. p. 173.  N  Y  Y  Y  N Brief mention in a table. No in-depth coverage or discussion. Fails WP:SIGCOV
"ARIA Awards – Winners by Award". Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA). Retrieved 12 November 2018.  Y  Y  Y  N  N A primary source, so can not be used to prove notability as it is not secondary. Fails WP:SIGCOV
Sara Macliver website  Y  ?  N  ?  N Not actually a website of the subject. Bach cantatas is a website anyone can edit, including the subject, just like wikipedia. Not reliable.
*Naxos website  Y  N  Y  N  N Lacks independence from the subject as it is her record label. Fails WP:SIGCOV
Post Newspapers interview  Y  N  ?  Y  N Interviews are considered WP:PRIMARY sources because they typically don't involve fact checking and lack independence from the subject. Fails WP:SIGCOV.
Total qualifying sources 0
There must be multiple qualifying sources to meet the notability requirements

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Owen× 20:48, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]