Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Locklin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:27, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vicky Locklin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable radio presenter - Funky Snack (Talk) 15:36, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article has only existed 12 years and is only sourced to twitter. I can't believe how bad our sourcing is on articles that are allowed to exist for so long.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kj cheetham (talk) 16:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: not sufficiently notable. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:23, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nothing on the subject rises to the level of meeting notability, which the lack of sources attests to. --Kbabej (talk) 15:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.