Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vienam war

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete. I agree with Heathcliff. Golbez 03:34, May 18, 2005 (UTC)

Vienam war

Not useful

• Speedy deleted, entire content was Vietnam had a war. Created by an anon with a history of vandalism, useless title, speedy delete criterion article #1 I assume (I didn't do it), or possibly as pure vandalism, either would do. Please sign your votes, User:B.d.mills, this one led to a real fiasco. Andrewa 15:50, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Vietnam war as potential misspeling. Radiant_* 17:29, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'd support that. I don't think it's a big deal in this case, but yes, our policy has been to assume that any misspelling that can happen once can happen again. It was still a valid speedy IMO, but recreating it as a redir would be fine, if anyone thinks it's important. Andrewa 03:08, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
• Agree withspeedy delete. There are hundreds of ways to mistype Vietnam. Do they all get a redirect page?--Heathcliff 04:36, 17 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.