User talk:Veinor: Difference between revisions
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <center> (1x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
|||
| (24 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=October 7, 2013}} |
|||
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
||
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
||
| Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
|archive = User talk:Veinor/Archive %(counter)d |
|archive = User talk:Veinor/Archive %(counter)d |
||
}} |
}} |
||
<center>'''Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.'''</ |
<div class="center">'''Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.'''</div> |
||
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|September 11, 2005 - November 28, 2006]]<br>[[/Archive 2|November 28, 2006 - January 4, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 3|January 4, 2006 - January 28, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 4|January 28, 2007 - March 9, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 5|March 9, 2007 - March 25, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 6|March 25, 2007 - April 23, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 7|April 15, 2007 - May 22, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 8|May 22, 2007 - April 20, 2008]]<br>[[/Archive 9|April 20, 2008 - {{ |
{{archive box|[[/Archive 1|September 11, 2005 - November 28, 2006]]<br>[[/Archive 2|November 28, 2006 - January 4, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 3|January 4, 2006 - January 28, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 4|January 28, 2007 - March 9, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 5|March 9, 2007 - March 25, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 6|March 25, 2007 - April 23, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 7|April 15, 2007 - May 22, 2007]]<br>[[/Archive 8|May 22, 2007 - April 20, 2008]]<br>[[/Archive 9|April 20, 2008 - {{#time:F j, Y|-3 days}}]]}} |
||
== PSA Artwork == |
== PSA Artwork == |
||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
== Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity == |
|||
== additions were deleted == |
|||
Hi, My additions were deleted. I want to inform the creative public that such user generated video games are available for free |
|||
My contents are as below |
|||
There are many social gaming web sites which allow social gaming community to connect, upload games, and compete against each. Most of the web sites are free and users can upload their unique games and play what other users have uploaded. |
|||
Arcadewarfare serves as an online social gaming web site. Online social gaming community can connect, upload games, and compete against each other for prizes.([[User:Thivankasl|Thivankasl]] ([[User talk:Thivankasl|talk]]) 11:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)) |
|||
:The problem is that the way you were adding this information didn't really add any information to the article; in addition, it's also a sort of advertisement for Arcadewarfare, going against [[WP:EL|the external link guidelines]]. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 11:32, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Veinor == |
|||
Yes I just recieved your awful excuse of a message about not being able to make a 'Red Smoke' page. |
|||
You spoke about sources? |
|||
How about if I get permisson from the bloke himself and from hundreds of students that prove he deserves a page? |
|||
Answer me this, how the hell is this page offending anyone/anything. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Red red red smoke|Red red red smoke]] ([[User talk:Red red red smoke|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Red red red smoke|contribs]]) 12:12, 12 October 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
:It all boils down to [[WP:V|verifiability]]; articles need to have sources, and there are [[WP:RS|standards for what can qualify]]. The creator of a thing can't be the exclusive source, since otherwise we could have an article called [[That sandwich I got last night at the student center]] (tuna with lettuce, by the way). Now, if for some bizarre reason there were newspaper articles devoted to said sandwich, there would be an article. But there aren't. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 12:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Do you not understand that 'Red Smoke' IS a human being? |
|||
The WORST example I have heard in my life, didn't make any reference whatsoever to my page? |
|||
I can't believe you are stopping me creating this page? |
|||
You still haven't given a valid reason, apart from giving me "Big MEANINGFUL Words" that makes you sound so highly intellectual, however your sitting there stopping me creating a page on a website? |
|||
Who will type red smoke in the search apart from people who know of him? [[User:Red red red smoke|Red red red smoke]] ([[User talk:Red red red smoke|talk]]) 12:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I don't feel like having two discussions at once for no good reason, would you mind centralizing it on [[User talk:Red red red smoke|your talk page]]? [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 12:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:In any case, just because Red Smoke may be a human being doesn't mean that we all of a sudden don't need sources in order to have a good article about him. You can't act as the exclusive source about yourself no matter who you are, and most people won't count as sources either. It's only people who're known to be [[WP:RS|reliable sources of information]] that can count as sources. |
|||
:As for the 'it doesn't hurt anybody' argument, this is one that we tend to get a lot. But the problem is that the purpose of Wikipedia is to provide [[WP:V|verifiable]] information; articles that don't have proper sourcing detract from this purpose. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 12:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Hmmm seems funny after my comment that you want to speak privately??? |
|||
Perhaps I will have to 'boss' [[User:Red red red smoke|Red red red smoke]] ([[User talk:Red red red smoke|talk]]) 12:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:It's not like your talk page is any more private; matter of fact, if we get involved in a dispute that requires outside arbitration, people are more likely to check ''your'' talk page than mine. I'm fine with you discussing it on this page, I just don't like having to go back and forth between two pages for no reason. Your call. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 12:42, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Im not disputing son, I just think its a joke that I can't make a page for this man? How the hell have some people got pages then? |
|||
Example, Adam Proudlock has a page? |
|||
You having a laugh!!![[User:Red red red smoke|Red red red smoke]] ([[User talk:Red red red smoke|talk]]) 12:47, 12 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Jospeh Cao == |
|||
<s>Please stop undoing my attempt to remove vandalism from the Jospeh Cao article, thanks</s> [[Special:Contributions/99.241.95.241|99.241.95.241]] ([[User talk:99.241.95.241|talk]]) 04:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:I got the diffs mixed up. This is what happens when I try to multitask and revert at the same time. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 04:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
::No worries, good work on protecting the page[[Special:Contributions/99.241.95.241|99.241.95.241]] ([[User talk:99.241.95.241|talk]]) 04:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
:::I concur, good work. :)--[[User:Kross|Kross]][[User talk:Kross|<sup>Transmit?</sup>]] 05:00, 8 November 2009 (UTC) |
|||
== Undeletion of [[Paul Uppal]] == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] |
|||
The article for Paul Uppal was deleted because it was decided that as a party political candidate he was a non notable person. It was you who oversaw the decision to delete the article. On May 6th 2010, Paul Uppal was elected MP for the British House of Commons parliamentary constituency of [[Wolverhampton South West]]. I beleive this makes him a notable person and the decision to delete the article on Paul Uppal should be reviewed. [[Special:Contributions/92.23.36.48|92.23.36.48]] ([[User talk:92.23.36.48|talk]]) 09:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin --> [[User:MadmanBot|MadmanBot]] ([[User talk:MadmanBot|talk]]) 01:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Happy 7th Wikipedia Anniversary to you :) == |
|||
Hi Veinor :) Greetings on your 7th Wikipedia Anniversary since your joining of Wikipedia on 11 September, 2005! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! [[User:TheGeneralUser|TheGeneralUser]] ([[User talk:TheGeneralUser|talk]]) 18:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC) |
|||
I concur. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/89.195.201.60|89.195.201.60]] ([[User talk:89.195.201.60|talk]]) 22:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
==Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== |
|||
==Deletion review for [[:Paul Uppal]]== |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
An editor has asked for a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review#Paul Uppal|deletion review]] of [[:Paul Uppal]]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. <!-- This originally was from the template {{subst:DRVNote|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~ --> [[User:Jttw|Jttw]] ([[User talk:Jttw|talk]]) 18:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at [[WP:RFA]]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->[[User:MadmanBot|MadmanBot]] ([[User talk:MadmanBot|talk]]) 00:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== |
|||
== Talk pages by size == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at [[WP:RFA]]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->[[User:MadmanBot|MadmanBot]] ([[User talk:MadmanBot|talk]]) 00:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity== |
|||
Please see the new page [[Wikipedia:Database reports/Talk pages by size]] (to be updated weekly). This talk page ranks fifth, with 23252 kilobytes. |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] |
|||
Perhaps this will motivate greater efficiency in the use of kilobytes. <br> |
|||
Following a [[Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/suspend sysop rights of inactive admins|community discussion]] in June 2011, consensus was reached to [[Wikipedia:Administrators#Procedural removal for inactive administrators|provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year]] (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard]] and the userright will be restored per the [[Wikipedia:Bureaucrats#Resysopping|re-sysopping process]] (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at [[WP:RFA]]. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->[[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC) |
|||
—[[User:Wavelength|Wavelength]] ([[User talk:Wavelength|talk]]) 21:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
:What? Does this include archives or not? Because I have an incredibly difficult time believing that even with archives, my talk page takes up ''23 megabytes''. [[User:Veinor|Veinor]] [[User_talk:Veinor|<sup>(talk to me)</sup>]] 21:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 23:45, 21 March 2023
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Veinor has not edited Wikipedia since October 7, 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
PSA Artwork
[edit]April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." ~~~~
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Happy 7th Wikipedia Anniversary to you :)
[edit]Hi Veinor :) Greetings on your 7th Wikipedia Anniversary since your joining of Wikipedia on 11 September, 2005! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:57, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
[edit]
Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Acalamari 09:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)