Frogs into Princes: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Preferred Representational Systems (PRS): add eye accessing cue chart from frogs. |
m Renamed references using RefRenamer |
||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|1979 book}} |
{{Short description|1979 neuro-linguistic programming book}} |
||
{{Infobox book |
|||
'''''Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming''''' (1979) is a book by [[Richard Bandler]] and [[John Grinder]], co-founders of [[neuro-linguistic programming]] (NLP).<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bandler |first1=Richard |last2=Grinder |first2=John |year=1979 |title=Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming |place=Moab, UT |publisher=Real People Press |isbn=0-911226-19-2}}</ref> The book is one of several produced from transcripts of their seminars from the late 1970s, and has sold more than 270,000 copies.<ref name="Clancy and Yorkshire 1989">{{cite journal |last1=Clancy |first1=Frank |last2=Yorkshire |first2=Heidi |year=1989 |title=The Bandler Method |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DOcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA22 |journal=[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]] |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=22–28 |issn=0362-8841 |access-date=26 April 2024 |via=Google Books}}</ref> The book offers examples of Bandler and Grinder employing various NLP techniques, including the Meta Model, representational systems, rapport-building, anchoring, and reframing. |
|||
| italic title = yes |
|||
| name = Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming |
|||
| image = |
|||
| image_size = |
|||
| border = |
|||
| alt = |
|||
| caption = |
|||
| author = [[John Grinder]]; [[Richard Bandler]] |
|||
| country = United States |
|||
| language = English |
|||
| subject = [[Communication]] |
|||
| publisher = Real People Press |
|||
| pub_date = 1979 |
|||
| pages = 194 |
|||
| isbn = 0-911226-19-2 |
|||
}} |
|||
'''''Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming''''' (1979) is a book by [[Richard Bandler]] and [[John Grinder]], co-founders of [[neuro-linguistic programming]] (NLP), which is considered a [[pseudoscience]].<ref>{{Cite book |title=Science and Pseudoscience in Social Work Practice |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nE9FCQAAQBAJ&q=nlp&pg=PA166 |publisher=Springer Publishing Company |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-8261-7769-8 |first1=Bruce A. |last1=Thyer |first2=Monica G. |last2=Pignotti |pages=56–57, 165–167 |quote=As NLP became more popular, some research was conducted and reviews of such research have concluded that there is no scientific basis for its theories about representational systems and eye movements.}}</ref><ref name="Sharpley-1987">{{cite journal | last=Sharpley | first=Christopher F. | title=Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory? | journal=Journal of Counseling Psychology | volume=34 | issue=1 | date=1987 | issn=1939-2168 | doi=10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103 | pages=103–107}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Witkowski |first=Tomasz |title=Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration? |journal=Polish Psychological Bulletin |date=1 January 2010 |volume=41 |issue=2 |doi=10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0|quote=All of this leaves me with an overwhelming impression that the analyzed base of scientific articles is treated just as theater decoration, being the background for the pseudoscientific farce which NLP appears to be. Using "scientific" attributes, which is so characteristic of pseudoscience, is manifested also in other aspects of NLP activities... My analysis leads undeniably to the statement that NLP represents pseudoscientific rubbish|doi-access=free }}</ref> The book is one of several produced from transcripts of their seminars from the late 1970s, and has sold more than 270,000 copies.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Clancy |first1=Frank |last2=Yorkshire |first2=Heidi |year=1989 |title=The Bandler Method |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DOcDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA22 |journal=[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]] |volume=14 |issue=2 |pages=22–28 |issn=0362-8841 |access-date=26 April 2024 |via=Google Books}}</ref> The book offers examples of Bandler and Grinder employing various NLP techniques, representational systems, rapport-building, anchoring, and reframing. |
|||
==Preferred Representational Systems (PRS)== |
==Preferred Representational Systems (PRS)== |
||
| Line 6: | Line 24: | ||
{{further|Neuro-linguistic programming#Scientific criticism}} |
{{further|Neuro-linguistic programming#Scientific criticism}} |
||
The authors |
The authors emphasized the role of representational systems in how individuals process the world. They noted that people tend to rely on visual, auditory, kinesthetic (feeling), olfactory (smell), or gustatory (taste) systems to represent experiences. The book delves into how to identify someone's [[Representational systems (NLP)|preferred system]], the significance of eye-accessing cues and importance of matching sensory-based language to enhance rapport and communication.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Bandler |first1=Richard |last2=Grinder |first2=John |year=1979 |title=Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming |place=Moab, UT |publisher=Real People Press |isbn=0-911226-19-2 |page=5}}</ref> |
||
A review of research findings suggested many underlying principles presented in this book lacked rigorous scientific validation. Some of the underlying principles presented in this book, like the idea that people have preferred representation systems, the methods used to identify a client's preferred systems, or that therapists should match their clients' sensory predicates, are claimed to be crucial for effective communications and therapy. However, these principles lack solid support within the psychological research. |
A review of research findings suggested many underlying principles presented in this book lacked rigorous scientific validation. Some of the underlying principles presented in this book, like the idea that people have preferred representation systems, the methods used to identify a client's preferred systems, or that therapists should match their clients' sensory predicates, are claimed to be crucial for effective communications and therapy. However, these principles lack solid support within the psychological research.<ref name="Sharpley-1987"/> |
||
==Rewinding== |
==Rewinding== |
||
Rewinding of traumatic memories was a concept first described by Bandler and Grinder in ''Frogs into Princes''<ref name="Rattel-2023">{{cite report | last=Rattel | first=Julina A. | last2=Danböck | first2=Sarah K. | last3=Miedl | first3=Stephan F. | last4=Liedlgruber | first4=Michael | last5=Wilhelm | first5=Frank H. | title=Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions | date=2023-10-18 | doi=10.31219/osf.io/y9drb |page=4}}</ref> and further defined in Richard Bandler's book ''Using your brain—for a change''.<ref>{{cite book | last=Bandler | first=Richard | title=Using Your Brain—for a Change | editor1-last=Andreas | editor1-first=Connirae | editor2-last=Andreas | editor2-first=Steve | publisher=Real People Press | publication-place=Moab, Utah | date=1985 | isbn=978-0-911226-27-0 | page=}}</ref> Limited studies have been performed based on the concept of rewinding, and they have not produced conclusive evidence towards the efficacy of rewinding as a therapeutic protocol.<ref>{{cite journal | last=Astill Wright | first=Laurence | last2=Barawi | first2=Kali | last3=Simon | first3=Natalie | last4=Lewis | first4=Catrin | last5=Muss | first5=David | last6=Roberts | first6=Neil P. | last7=Kitchiner | first7=Neil J | last8=Bisson | first8=Jonathan I | title=The reconsolidation using rewind study (RETURN): trial protocol | journal=European Journal of Psychotraumatology | volume=12 | issue=1 | date=2021 | issn=2000-8066 | pmid=34377356 | pmc=8330760 | doi=10.1080/20008198.2020.1844439 | page=}}</ref><ref name="Rattel-2023"/><ref>{{cite journal | last=Astill Wright | first=Laurence | last2=Barawi | first2=Kali | last3=Kitchiner | first3=Neil | last4=Kitney | first4=Danielle | last5=Lewis | first5=Catrin | last6=Roberts | first6=Alice | last7=Roberts | first7=Neil P. | last8=Simon | first8=Natalie | last9=Ariti | first9=Cono | last10=Nussey | first10=Ian | last11=Muss | first11=David | last12=Bisson | first12=Jonathan I. | title=Rewind for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial | journal=Depression and Anxiety | volume=2023 | date=2023-10-12 | issn=1520-6394 | doi=10.1155/2023/6279649 | doi-access=free | pages=1–11}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Hartford | first=Lisa | last2=Horrocks | first2=Matthew | title=Muss Rewind Therapy to alleviate symptoms related to some form of traumatic experience: A thematic analysis of participants' experiences and their perceived effectiveness of MRT | journal=Counselling and Psychotherapy Research | volume=24 | issue=1 | date=2024 | issn=1473-3145 | doi=10.1002/capr.12644 | pages=258–274}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
''Rewinding'' of traumatic memories was first described by Bandler and Grinder in Frogs into Princes{{sfn | Rattel | Danböck | Miedl | Liedlgruber | 2023 | p=4}} and further defined in Richard Bandler's book '''Using your brain--for a change.'''<ref>Bandler, R., Andreas, S., & Andreas, C. (1985). Using your brain--for a change. MOAB.</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
==Further reading== |
|||
;Book reviews |
|||
{{refbegin|2}} |
|||
*{{cite journal | last=Gladfelter | first=John | title=Frogs into Princes | journal=International Journal of Group Psychotherapy | volume=30 | issue=3 | date=1980 | issn=0020-7284 | doi=10.1080/00207284.1980.11491704 | pages=373–374 |ref=none}} |
|||
*{{cite journal | last=Nations | first=Bailey | title=Bandler, Richard and Grinder, John, Frogs into Princes | journal=TACD Journal | volume=13 | issue=1 | date=1985 | issn=1046-171X | doi=10.1080/1046171X.1985.12034240 | pages=68–69 |ref=none}} |
|||
*{{cite journal | last=Rowan | first=John | last2=Crippledini | first2=James | last3=Wilton | first3=Susi | last4=Milroy | first4=Vivian | last5=Matthews | first5=Mark | title=Book Reviews | journal=Self & Society | volume=11 | issue=3 | date=1983 | issn=0306-0497 | doi=10.1080/03060497.1983.11084535 | pages=166–175 |ref=none}} |
|||
*{{Cite journal | last = Westwood| first = M. J.| year = 2012| title = Bandler, R., and Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs Into Princes: Neurolinguistic Programming| journal = Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy| volume = 14| issue = 2| url = https://cjc-rcc.ucalgary.ca/article/view/60323 |ref=none}} |
|||
{{refend}} |
|||
[[Category:1979 non-fiction books]] |
|||
==Notes== |
|||
* {{cite report | last=Rattel | first=Julina A. | last2=Danböck | first2=Sarah K. | last3=Miedl | first3=Stephan F | last4=Liedlgruber | first4=Michael | last5=Wilhelm | first5=Frank H. | title=Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions | date=2023-10-18 | doi=10.31219/osf.io/y9drb}} |
|||
* {{cite book | last=Bandler | first=Richard | last2=Grinder | first2=John | title=Frogs Into Princes | publication-place=Moab, Utah | date=1979 | isbn=978-0-911226-19-5}} |
|||
* {{cite journal | last=Sharpley | first=Christopher F. | title=Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory? | journal=Journal of Counseling Psychology | volume=34 | issue=1 | date=1987 | issn=1939-2168 | doi=10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103 | pages=103–107}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:Pseudoscience literature]] |
[[Category:Pseudoscience literature]] |
||
{{book-stub}} |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:09, 10 May 2024
| Author | John Grinder; Richard Bandler |
|---|---|
| Language | English |
| Subject | Communication |
| Publisher | Real People Press |
Publication date | 1979 |
| Publication place | United States |
| Pages | 194 |
| ISBN | 0-911226-19-2 |
Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming (1979) is a book by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, co-founders of neuro-linguistic programming (NLP), which is considered a pseudoscience.[1][2][3] The book is one of several produced from transcripts of their seminars from the late 1970s, and has sold more than 270,000 copies.[4] The book offers examples of Bandler and Grinder employing various NLP techniques, representational systems, rapport-building, anchoring, and reframing.
Preferred Representational Systems (PRS)
[edit]
The authors emphasized the role of representational systems in how individuals process the world. They noted that people tend to rely on visual, auditory, kinesthetic (feeling), olfactory (smell), or gustatory (taste) systems to represent experiences. The book delves into how to identify someone's preferred system, the significance of eye-accessing cues and importance of matching sensory-based language to enhance rapport and communication.[5]
A review of research findings suggested many underlying principles presented in this book lacked rigorous scientific validation. Some of the underlying principles presented in this book, like the idea that people have preferred representation systems, the methods used to identify a client's preferred systems, or that therapists should match their clients' sensory predicates, are claimed to be crucial for effective communications and therapy. However, these principles lack solid support within the psychological research.[2]
Rewinding
[edit]Rewinding of traumatic memories was a concept first described by Bandler and Grinder in Frogs into Princes[6] and further defined in Richard Bandler's book Using your brain—for a change.[7] Limited studies have been performed based on the concept of rewinding, and they have not produced conclusive evidence towards the efficacy of rewinding as a therapeutic protocol.[8][6][9][10]
References
[edit]- ^ Thyer, Bruce A.; Pignotti, Monica G. (2015). Science and Pseudoscience in Social Work Practice. Springer Publishing Company. pp. 56–57, 165–167. ISBN 978-0-8261-7769-8.
As NLP became more popular, some research was conducted and reviews of such research have concluded that there is no scientific basis for its theories about representational systems and eye movements.
- ^ a b Sharpley, Christopher F. (1987). "Research findings on neurolinguistic programming: Nonsupportive data or an untestable theory?". Journal of Counseling Psychology. 34 (1): 103–107. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.1.103. ISSN 1939-2168.
- ^ Witkowski, Tomasz (1 January 2010). "Thirty-Five Years of Research on Neuro-Linguistic Programming. NLP Research Data Base. State of the Art or Pseudoscientific Decoration?". Polish Psychological Bulletin. 41 (2). doi:10.2478/v10059-010-0008-0.
All of this leaves me with an overwhelming impression that the analyzed base of scientific articles is treated just as theater decoration, being the background for the pseudoscientific farce which NLP appears to be. Using "scientific" attributes, which is so characteristic of pseudoscience, is manifested also in other aspects of NLP activities... My analysis leads undeniably to the statement that NLP represents pseudoscientific rubbish
- ^ Clancy, Frank; Yorkshire, Heidi (1989). "The Bandler Method". Mother Jones. 14 (2): 22–28. ISSN 0362-8841. Retrieved 26 April 2024 – via Google Books.
- ^ Bandler, Richard; Grinder, John (1979). Frogs into Princes: Neuro Linguistic Programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press. p. 5. ISBN 0-911226-19-2.
- ^ a b Rattel, Julina A.; Danböck, Sarah K.; Miedl, Stephan F.; Liedlgruber, Michael; Wilhelm, Frank H. (2023-10-18). Hitting the Rewind Button: Imagining Analogue Trauma Memories in Reverse Reduces Distressing Intrusions (Report). p. 4. doi:10.31219/osf.io/y9drb.
- ^ Bandler, Richard (1985). Andreas, Connirae; Andreas, Steve (eds.). Using Your Brain—for a Change. Moab, Utah: Real People Press. ISBN 978-0-911226-27-0.
- ^ Astill Wright, Laurence; Barawi, Kali; Simon, Natalie; Lewis, Catrin; Muss, David; Roberts, Neil P.; Kitchiner, Neil J; Bisson, Jonathan I (2021). "The reconsolidation using rewind study (RETURN): trial protocol". European Journal of Psychotraumatology. 12 (1). doi:10.1080/20008198.2020.1844439. ISSN 2000-8066. PMC 8330760. PMID 34377356.
- ^ Astill Wright, Laurence; Barawi, Kali; Kitchiner, Neil; Kitney, Danielle; Lewis, Catrin; Roberts, Alice; Roberts, Neil P.; Simon, Natalie; Ariti, Cono; Nussey, Ian; Muss, David; Bisson, Jonathan I. (2023-10-12). "Rewind for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial". Depression and Anxiety. 2023: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2023/6279649. ISSN 1520-6394.
- ^ Hartford, Lisa; Horrocks, Matthew (2024). "Muss Rewind Therapy to alleviate symptoms related to some form of traumatic experience: A thematic analysis of participants' experiences and their perceived effectiveness of MRT". Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 24 (1): 258–274. doi:10.1002/capr.12644. ISSN 1473-3145.
Further reading
[edit]- Book reviews
- Gladfelter, John (1980). "Frogs into Princes". International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. 30 (3): 373–374. doi:10.1080/00207284.1980.11491704. ISSN 0020-7284.
- Nations, Bailey (1985). "Bandler, Richard and Grinder, John, Frogs into Princes". TACD Journal. 13 (1): 68–69. doi:10.1080/1046171X.1985.12034240. ISSN 1046-171X.
- Rowan, John; Crippledini, James; Wilton, Susi; Milroy, Vivian; Matthews, Mark (1983). "Book Reviews". Self & Society. 11 (3): 166–175. doi:10.1080/03060497.1983.11084535. ISSN 0306-0497.
- Westwood, M. J. (2012). "Bandler, R., and Grinder, J. (1979). Frogs Into Princes: Neurolinguistic Programming". Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 14 (2).