Creationism (soul): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Christian belief that God creates a soul for each human}} |
|||
{{About|a concept about origin of the soul|beliefs about the origin of the material world|Creationism}} |
{{About|a concept about the origin of the soul|beliefs about the origin of the material world|Creationism}} |
||
{{multiple issues|{{citation style|date=August 2013}} |
|||
{{More citations needed|date=August 2013}} |
|||
}} |
|||
'''Creationism''' |
'''Creationism''' is a [[doctrine]] held by some [[Christians]] that [[God]] creates a [[soul]] for each body that is generated.<ref name=EB1911>{{EB1911 |inline=y |wstitle=Creatianism and Traducianism |volume=7 |page=388 |first=Alexander |last=Nairne |author-link=Alexander Nairne}}</ref> Alternative Christian views on the origin of souls are [[traducianism]] and also the idea of a [[pre-existence|pre-existence of the soul]]. The Scholastic philosophers held the theory of Creationism. |
||
==Concept== |
|||
[[Augustine of Hippo]] was undecided between creationism and traducianism, while [[Jerome]] condemned traducianism and held that creationism was the opinion of the Church, though he admitted that most [[Western Christianity|Western Christians]] were traducianists. The question has never been authoritatively determined, but creationism, which had always prevailed in [[Eastern Christianity]], became the general opinion of the medieval theologians, and [[Peter Lombard]]'s ''creando infundit animas Deus et infundendo creat'' ("in creating, God pours in the soul, and in pouring, He creates") was an accepted formula. [[Martin Luther]], like Augustine, was undecided, but [[Lutherans]] have as a rule been traducianists. [[John Calvin]] favoured creationism. |
|||
Creationism holds that the origin of the soul cannot be by spiritual generation from the souls of parents (as the German theologian [[Jakob Frohschammer]] (1821-1893) maintained) because human souls, being essentially and integrally simple and indivisible, can give forth no spiritual germs or reproductive elements. The creation of the soul by the [[Unmoved mover#First cause|First Cause]], when second causes have posited the pertinent conditions, falls within the order of nature; it is a so-called "law of nature", not an interference therewith.<ref name=Siegfried>[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/04475a.htm Siegfried, Francis. "Creationism." The Catholic Encyclopedia] Vol. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908. 7 February 2019</ref>{{clarify|date=February 2022}} |
|||
As regards the time when the individual soul is created, philosophical speculation varies. The traditional philosophy of the Roman Catholic Church holds that the rational soul is created at the moment when it is infused into the new person. [[Thomas Aquinas]], following [[Aristotle]]'s embryology, taught that rational soul is created when the antecedent principles of life have rendered the foetus an appropriate organism for rational life, though some time is required after birth before the sensory organs are sufficiently developed to assist in the functions of intelligence. On the other hand, most neo-Scholastics hold that the rational soul is created and infused into the human being at the moment of conception.<ref name=Siegfried/> |
|||
Peter Lombard's phrase perhaps shows that even in the twelfth century it was felt that some union of the two opinions was needed, and Augustine's toleration pointed in the same direction, for the traducianism he thought possible was one in which God "'works' in maintaining those natures which He has created, not in creating new natures" <ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1102166.htm Ep. 166.5.11]</ref>. Modern psychologists teach that while "personality" can be discerned in its "becoming," nothing is known of its origin. [[Hermann Lotze]], however, who may be taken as representing the believers in the immanence of the divine Being, puts forth - but as a "dim conjecture" - something very like creationism <ref>Microcosmus, bk. iii. chap. v. ad fin</ref>. It is still, as in the days of Augustine, a question whether a more exact division of man into body, soul and spirit may help to throw light on this subject. |
|||
==History== |
|||
| ⚫ | This view is generally held by the contemporary magisterium of the [[Roman Catholic Church]], most notably in the instruction ''Dignitas Personae'' |
||
[[Augustine of Hippo]] was undecided between creationism and traducianism, while [[Jerome]] condemned traducianism and held that creationism was the opinion of the Church.<ref name= EB1911 /> Augustine attempted to reconcile the statement in Genesis 2:2 "On the seventh day God completed the work he had been doing; he rested on the seventh day from all the work he had undertaken," with Jerome's citation of John 5:17, ""My Father is at work until now, so I am at work,"<blockquote>if, I say, … we affirm that for each individual He creates separately a new soul when he is born, we do not herein affirm that He makes anything which he had not already made. For He had already made man after His own image on the sixth day; and this work of His is unquestionably to be understood with reference to the rational soul of man. The same work He still does, not in creating what did not exist, but in multiplying what already existed. Wherefore it is true, on the one hand, that He rested from creating things which previously did not exist, and equally true, on the other hand, that He continues still to work, not only in governing what He has made, but also in making (not anything which did not previously exist, but) a larger number of those creatures which He had already made. Wherefore, either by such an explanation, or by any other which may seem better, we escape from the objection advanced by those who would make the fact that God rested from His works a conclusive argument against our believing that new souls are still being daily created, not from the first soul, but in the same manner as it was made.<ref>[http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/1102166.htm "From Augustine to Jerome, on the origin of the soul (A.D. 415)", ''Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers'', First Series, Vol. 1. (Philip Schaff, ed.), Buffalo, New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1887.]{{PD-notice}}</ref></blockquote> |
|||
[[Philo]] and some rabbis insisted that God’s providence remains active, keeping all things in existence, giving life in birth and taking it away in death. Other rabbis taught that God rested from creating, but not from judging, ruling, or governing. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
{{Refimprove|date=July 2010}} |
|||
{{1911}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Creationism, which had always prevailed in [[Eastern Christianity]], became the general opinion of the medieval theologians. Amongst the Scholastics there were no defenders of Traducianism. [[Hugh of Saint Victor]] and [[Alexander of Hales]] alone characterize Creationism as the more probable opinion; all the other Schoolmen hold it as certain. [[Peter Lombard]]'s ''creando infundit animas Deus et infundendo creat'' ("in creating, God pours in the soul, and in pouring, He creates") was an accepted formula.<ref name=EB1911 /> |
|||
==External links== |
|||
* [http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Creatianism_and_traducianism Creatianism and Traducianism] |
|||
[[Martin Luther]], like Augustine, was undecided, but [[Lutherans]] have as a rule been traducianists.<ref name= EB1911 /> [[John Calvin]] favoured creationism.<ref name= EB1911 /> |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[Category:Philosophical schools and traditions]] |
|||
[[Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz]] argued that Creationism guards the dignity and spirituality of the rational soul, and is the proper seat of the image of God.<ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=DKo8AAAAYAAJ&dq=Creationism+%28soul%29&pg=PA557 McClintock, John and Strong, James. "Creationism", Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature'', Vol. 2, Harper, 1894]</ref> [[Hermann Lotze]], however, who may be taken as representing the believers in the immanence of the divine Being, puts forth – but as a "dim conjecture" – something very like creationism.<ref name= EB1911/><ref>{{cite book |title=Microcosmus | volume = iii |chapter=v |first= Peter |last=Heylyn | work = Reference works | date = June 2015 | publisher = Brill |url= http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/christian-muslim-relations-ii/microcosmus-mikrocosmos-cosmographie-in-four-books-COM_26930}}</ref> |
|||
| ⚫ | This view is generally held by the contemporary magisterium of the [[Roman Catholic Church]], most notably in the instruction ''Dignitas Personae''. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 366, states that "The Church teaches that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God— it is not 'produced' by the parents…."<ref>{{citation | place = Vatican, Rome, IT |url= https://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P1B.HTM | work = Cathechism | publisher = Roman Catholic Church | title = Man}}</ref> |
||
{{Christian-theology-stub}} |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | |||
{{catholic|wstitle=Creationism}} |
|||
[[Category:Christian anthropology]] |
|||
[[de:Kreatianismus]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
[[es:Creacionismo (teología)]] |
|||
[[Category:Souls]] |
|||
[[pt:Criacionismo (alma)]] |
|||
Latest revision as of 11:15, 3 July 2024
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Creationism is a doctrine held by some Christians that God creates a soul for each body that is generated.[1] Alternative Christian views on the origin of souls are traducianism and also the idea of a pre-existence of the soul. The Scholastic philosophers held the theory of Creationism.
Concept
[edit]Creationism holds that the origin of the soul cannot be by spiritual generation from the souls of parents (as the German theologian Jakob Frohschammer (1821-1893) maintained) because human souls, being essentially and integrally simple and indivisible, can give forth no spiritual germs or reproductive elements. The creation of the soul by the First Cause, when second causes have posited the pertinent conditions, falls within the order of nature; it is a so-called "law of nature", not an interference therewith.[2][clarification needed]
As regards the time when the individual soul is created, philosophical speculation varies. The traditional philosophy of the Roman Catholic Church holds that the rational soul is created at the moment when it is infused into the new person. Thomas Aquinas, following Aristotle's embryology, taught that rational soul is created when the antecedent principles of life have rendered the foetus an appropriate organism for rational life, though some time is required after birth before the sensory organs are sufficiently developed to assist in the functions of intelligence. On the other hand, most neo-Scholastics hold that the rational soul is created and infused into the human being at the moment of conception.[2]
History
[edit]Augustine of Hippo was undecided between creationism and traducianism, while Jerome condemned traducianism and held that creationism was the opinion of the Church.[1] Augustine attempted to reconcile the statement in Genesis 2:2 "On the seventh day God completed the work he had been doing; he rested on the seventh day from all the work he had undertaken," with Jerome's citation of John 5:17, ""My Father is at work until now, so I am at work,"
if, I say, … we affirm that for each individual He creates separately a new soul when he is born, we do not herein affirm that He makes anything which he had not already made. For He had already made man after His own image on the sixth day; and this work of His is unquestionably to be understood with reference to the rational soul of man. The same work He still does, not in creating what did not exist, but in multiplying what already existed. Wherefore it is true, on the one hand, that He rested from creating things which previously did not exist, and equally true, on the other hand, that He continues still to work, not only in governing what He has made, but also in making (not anything which did not previously exist, but) a larger number of those creatures which He had already made. Wherefore, either by such an explanation, or by any other which may seem better, we escape from the objection advanced by those who would make the fact that God rested from His works a conclusive argument against our believing that new souls are still being daily created, not from the first soul, but in the same manner as it was made.[3]
Philo and some rabbis insisted that God’s providence remains active, keeping all things in existence, giving life in birth and taking it away in death. Other rabbis taught that God rested from creating, but not from judging, ruling, or governing.
Creationism, which had always prevailed in Eastern Christianity, became the general opinion of the medieval theologians. Amongst the Scholastics there were no defenders of Traducianism. Hugh of Saint Victor and Alexander of Hales alone characterize Creationism as the more probable opinion; all the other Schoolmen hold it as certain. Peter Lombard's creando infundit animas Deus et infundendo creat ("in creating, God pours in the soul, and in pouring, He creates") was an accepted formula.[1]
Martin Luther, like Augustine, was undecided, but Lutherans have as a rule been traducianists.[1] John Calvin favoured creationism.[1]
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz argued that Creationism guards the dignity and spirituality of the rational soul, and is the proper seat of the image of God.[4] Hermann Lotze, however, who may be taken as representing the believers in the immanence of the divine Being, puts forth – but as a "dim conjecture" – something very like creationism.[1][5]
This view is generally held by the contemporary magisterium of the Roman Catholic Church, most notably in the instruction Dignitas Personae. The Catechism of the Catholic Church, 366, states that "The Church teaches that every spiritual soul is created immediately by God— it is not 'produced' by the parents…."[6]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Nairne, Alexander (1911). "Creatianism and Traducianism". In Chisholm, Hugh (ed.). Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 388.
- ^ a b Siegfried, Francis. "Creationism." The Catholic Encyclopedia Vol. 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1908. 7 February 2019
- ^ "From Augustine to Jerome, on the origin of the soul (A.D. 415)", Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 1. (Philip Schaff, ed.), Buffalo, New York: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1887.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
- ^ McClintock, John and Strong, James. "Creationism", Cyclopaedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, Vol. 2, Harper, 1894
- ^ Heylyn, Peter (June 2015). "v". Microcosmus. Vol. iii. Brill.
{{cite book}}:|work=ignored (help) - ^ "Man", Cathechism, Vatican, Rome, IT: Roman Catholic Church
This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Creationism". Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company.