Republic of Venice: Difference between revisions
Šaholjubac (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(45 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| native_name = {{plainlist}} |
| native_name = {{plainlist}} |
||
* {{native_name|it|Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia}} |
* {{native_name|it|Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia}} |
||
* {{native_name|vec|Serenìsima Repùblega de |
* {{native_name|vec|Serenìsima Repùblega de Venexia}} |
||
{{endplainlist}} |
{{endplainlist}} |
||
| conventional_long_name = Most Serene Republic of Venice |
| conventional_long_name = Most Serene Republic of Venice |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| other_symbol = <div style="padding:0.3em;">[[File:Greater Coat of Arms of the Republic of Venice, 1706.svg|90px]]</div> |
| other_symbol = <div style="padding:0.3em;">[[File:Greater Coat of Arms of the Republic of Venice, 1706.svg|90px]]</div> |
||
| other_symbol_type = Greater coat of arms (1706) |
| other_symbol_type = Greater coat of arms (1706) |
||
| image_map = |
| image_map = Venezianische_Kolonien.png |
||
| image_map_caption = |
| image_map_caption = Map of the Venetian overseas domains ([[Stato da Màr]]) |
||
| year_start = 697 |
| year_start = 697 |
||
| year_end = 1797 |
| year_end = 1797 |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| event1 = ''[[Pactum Lotharii]]'' (recognition of ''de facto'' independence, "province" dropped from name) |
| event1 = ''[[Pactum Lotharii]]'' (recognition of ''de facto'' independence, "province" dropped from name) |
||
| date_event1 = 840 |
| date_event1 = 840 |
||
| event2 = [[Byzantine–Venetian |
| event2 = [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|Golden Bull]] of [[Alexios I]] |
||
| date_event2 = 1082 |
| date_event2 = 1082 |
||
| event3 = [[Treaty of Venice]] |
| event3 = [[Treaty of Venice]] |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
| date_end = |
| date_end = |
||
| p1 = Exarchate of Ravenna |
| p1 = Exarchate of Ravenna |
||
| |
| s1 = Provisional Municipality of Venice |
||
| |
| flag_s1 = Italy cockade.svg |
||
| s1 = Venetian Province |
|||
| flag_s1 = Coat of arms of the Venetian Province.svg |
|||
| border_s1 = no |
| border_s1 = no |
||
| s2 = Austrian Empire |
|||
| flag_s2 = Flag of the Habsburg Monarchy.svg |
|||
| s3 = Cisalpine Republic |
|||
| flag_s3 = Flag of the Repubblica Cisalpina.svg |
|||
| s4 = French departments of Greece |
|||
| flag_s4 = Flag of France.svg |
|||
| official_languages = {{ubl| |
| official_languages = {{ubl| |
||
* |
*Italian<ref>{{Cite web |title=VENEZIA E LA LINGUA UFFICIALE DELLO STATO VENETO |url=https://dalvenetoalmondoblog.blogspot.com/2018/12/venezia-e-la-lingua-ufficiale-dello.html |access-date=2022-11-02 |website=VENEZIA E LA LINGUA UFFICIALE DELLO STATO VENETO |archive-date=2 November 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221102083400/https://dalvenetoalmondoblog.blogspot.com/2018/12/venezia-e-la-lingua-ufficiale-dello.html |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name=unipd>{{Cite web|title=Venezia 1600: un dialetto e una lingua|author=Francesca Forzan|date=29 May 2021 |language=it|access-date=2022-12-26|url=https://ilbolive.unipd.it/it/news/venezia-1600-dialetto-lingua|publisher=Università di Padova|archive-date=26 December 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221226172932/https://ilbolive.unipd.it/it/news/venezia-1600-dialetto-lingua|url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
*[[Venetian language|Venetian]] |
*[[Venetian language|Venetian]] |
||
*[[Latin]] |
*[[Latin]] |
||
Line 61: | Line 53: | ||
| languages_type = Minority languages |
| languages_type = Minority languages |
||
| languages = {{flatlist| |
| languages = {{flatlist| |
||
*[[Croatian language|Croatian]] |
|||
*[[Greek language|Greek]] |
|||
*[[Istriot language|Istriot]] |
|||
*[[Friulian language|Friulian]] |
*[[Friulian language|Friulian]] |
||
*[[Lombard language|Lombard]] |
*[[Lombard language|Lombard]] |
||
*[[ |
*[[Cimbrian language|Cimbrian]] |
||
*[[Istriot language|Istriot]] |
|||
*[[Dalmatian language|Dalmatian]] |
*[[Dalmatian language|Dalmatian]] |
||
*[[Albanian language|Albanian]] |
*[[Albanian language|Albanian]] |
||
*[[Greek language|Greek]] |
|||
*[[Serbo-Croatian]] |
|||
*[[Slovene language|Slovene]]}} |
*[[Slovene language|Slovene]]}} |
||
| capital = {{plainlist| |
| capital = {{plainlist| |
||
Line 95: | Line 87: | ||
| HDI = |
| HDI = |
||
| HDI_year = |
| HDI_year = |
||
| religion = [[Roman Catholicism]] (state) |
|||
| religion = [[Roman Catholicism]]<ref>{{cite book|title=Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today|first=Scott|last=Gordon|year=2009|isbn=9780674037830|page=149|publisher=Harvard University Press|quote=Venice was the most cosmopolitan city in Europe in the sixteenth century, but its many churches were almost entirely Christian and Catholic, and Catholicism was the official religion of the republic.}}</ref> |
|||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''Republic of Venice''' |
The '''Republic of Venice''',{{efn|{{lang-it|Repubblica di Venezia}} or {{lang|it|Repubblica Veneta}}; {{lang-vec|Repùblega de Venexia}} or {{lang|vec|Repùblega Vèneta}}.}} traditionally known as '''La Serenissima''',{{efn|Short for {{lang|it|Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia}}; {{lang-en|[[Most Serene Republic]] of Venice|italics=yes}}; {{lang-vec|Serenìsima Repùblega de Venexia|links=no}}.}} was a [[sovereign state]] and [[Maritime republics|maritime republic]] with its capital in [[Venice]]. Founded, according to tradition, in 697 by [[Paolo Lucio Anafesto]], over the course of its [[History of the Republic of Venice|1,100 years of history]] it established itself as one of the major European commercial and naval powers. Initially extended in the ''[[Dogado]]'' area (a territory currently comparable to the [[Metropolitan City of Venice]]), during its history it annexed a large part of [[Northeast Italy]], [[Istria]], [[Dalmatia]], the coasts of present-day [[Montenegro]] and [[Albania]] as well as numerous islands in the [[Adriatic Sea|Adriatic]] and eastern [[Ionian Sea|Ionian]] seas. At the height of its expansion, between the 13th and 16th centuries, it also governed the [[Peloponnese]], [[Crete]] and [[Cyprus]], most of the [[List of islands of Greece|Greek islands]], as well as several cities and ports in the eastern [[Mediterranean Sea|Mediterranean]]. |
||
The islands of the [[Venetian Lagoon]] in the 7th century, after having experienced a period of substantial increase in population, were organized into [[Maritime Venice]], a [[Byzantine Empire|Byzantine]] duchy dependent on the [[Exarchate of Ravenna]]. With the fall of the Exarchate and the weakening of Byzantine power, the [[Dogado|Duchy of Venice]] arose, led by a [[Doge of Venice|doge]] and established on the island of [[Rialto]]; it prospered from maritime trade with the Byzantine Empire and other eastern states. To safeguard the trade routes, between the 9th and 11th centuries the Duchy waged several wars, which ensured its complete dominion over the Adriatic. Owing to participation in the [[Crusades]], penetration into eastern markets became increasingly stronger and, between the 12th and 13th centuries, Venice managed to extend its power into numerous eastern emporiums and commercial ports. The supremacy over the Mediterranean Sea led the Republic to the clash with [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]], which lasted until the 14th century, when, after having risked complete collapse during the [[War of Chioggia]] (with the Genoese army and fleet in the lagoon for a long period), Venice quickly managed to recover from the territorial losses suffered with the [[Treaty of Turin (1381)|Treaty of Turin]] of 1381 and begin [[Domini di Terraferma|expansion on the mainland]]. |
|||
In its early years, it prospered on the [[salt trade]]. In subsequent centuries, the city-state established a [[thalassocracy]]. It dominated trade on the [[Mediterranean Sea]], including commerce between [[Europe]] and [[North Africa]], as well as [[Asia]]. The [[Venetian navy]] was used in the [[Crusades]], most notably in the [[Fourth Crusade]]. However, Venice perceived [[Rome]] as an enemy and maintained high levels of religious and ideological independence personified by the [[patriarch of Venice]]<ref name=regis_aeterni>"[https://books.google.com/books?id=DklEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA107 Translatio patriarchalis Ecclesiae Graden. ad civitatem Venetiarum, cum suppressione tituli eiusdem Ecclesiae Gradensis] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319004904/https://books.google.com/books?id=DklEAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA107 |date=19 March 2021 }}", in: ''Bullarum, diplomatum et privilegiorum sanctorum Romanorum pontificum Taurinensis editio'', vol. 5 (Turin: Franco et Dalmazzo, 1860), pp. 107–109.</ref> and a highly developed independent publishing industry that served as a haven from [[Catholic Church|Catholic]] censorship for many centuries. Venice achieved territorial conquests along the [[Adriatic Sea]]. It became home to an extremely wealthy merchant class, who patronised renowned art and architecture along the city's lagoons. Venetian merchants were influential financiers in Europe. The city was also the birthplace of great European explorers, such as [[Marco Polo]], as well as [[Baroque]] composers such as [[Antonio Vivaldi]] and [[Benedetto Marcello]] and famous painters such as the Renaissance master [[Titian]]. |
|||
Venetian expansion, however, led to the coalition of the [[Habsburg monarchy]], Spain and France in the [[League of Cambrai]], which in 1509 defeated the Republic of Venice in the [[Battle of Agnadello]]. While maintaining most of its mainland possessions, Venice was defeated and the attempt to expand the eastern dominions caused a [[Ottoman–Venetian wars|long series of wars]] against the [[Ottoman Empire]], which ended only in the 18th century with the [[Treaty of Passarowitz]] of 1718 and which caused the loss of all possessions in the [[Aegean Sea|Aegean]]. Although still a thriving cultural centre, the Republic of Venice was occupied by [[Napoleon]]'s French troops and its territories were divided with the Habsburg monarchy following the ratification of the [[Treaty of Campo Formio]]. |
|||
The republic was ruled by the [[Doge of Venice|doge]], who was elected by members of the [[Great Council of Venice]], the city-state's [[parliament]], and ruled for life. The ruling class was an [[oligarchy]] of merchants and [[Venetian nobility|Venetian aristocrats]]. Venice and other Italian maritime republics played a key role in fostering [[capitalism]]. Venetian citizens generally supported the system of governance. The city-state enforced strict laws and employed ruthless tactics in its prisons. |
|||
Throughout its history, the Republic of Venice was characterized by its political order. Inherited from the previous Byzantine administrative structures, its head of state was the doge, a position which became elective from the end of the 9th century. In addition to the doge, the administration of the Republic was directed by various assemblies: the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]], with legislative functions, which was supported by the [[Minor Council]], the [[Council of Forty]] and the [[Council of Ten]], responsible for judicial matters, and the [[Venetian Senate|Senate]]. |
|||
The opening of new trade routes to the [[Americas]] and the [[East Indies]] via the Atlantic Ocean marked the beginning of Venice's decline as a powerful maritime republic. The city-state also suffered defeats at the hands of the navy of the [[Ottoman Empire]]. In 1797, the republic was plundered by retreating Austrian and then French forces, following an invasion by [[Napoleon Bonaparte]]. Subsequently, the Republic of Venice was divided into the Austrian [[Venetian Province]], the [[Cisalpine Republic]] (a French client state), and the Ionian [[French rule in the Ionian Islands (1797–1799)|French departments of Greece]]. Venice, along with the whole of Veneto, became part of a [[Unification of Italy|unified Italy]] in the 19th century following the [[Kingdom of Italy]]'s victory against Austria in the [[Third Italian War of Independence|Third War of Italian Independence]]. |
|||
{{anchor|Etymology}} |
{{anchor|Etymology}} |
||
==Etymology== |
==Etymology== |
||
During its long history, the Republic of Venice took on various names, all closely linked to the titles attributed to the [[Doge of Venice|doge]]. During the 8th century, when Venice still depended on the [[Byzantine Empire]], the doge was called in Latin {{Lang|la|Dux Venetiarum Provinciae}} ('Doge of the Province of Venice'),{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=348}} and then, starting from 840, {{Lang|la|Dux Veneticorum}} ('Doge of the Venetians'), following the signing of the {{Lang|la|[[Pactum Lotharii]]}}. This commercial agreement, stipulated between the Duchy of Venice ({{Lang|la|Ducatum Venetiae}}) and the [[Carolingian Empire]], ''de facto'' ratified the independence of Venice from the Byzantine Empire.{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=356}} |
During its long history, the Republic of Venice took on various names, all closely linked to the titles attributed to the [[Doge of Venice|doge]]. During the 8th century, when Venice still depended on the [[Byzantine Empire]], the doge was called in Latin {{Lang|la|Dux Venetiarum Provinciae}} ('Doge of the Province of Venice'),{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=348}} and then, starting from 840, {{Lang|la|Dux Veneticorum}} ('Doge of the Venetians'), following the signing of the {{Lang|la|[[Pactum Lotharii]]}}. This commercial agreement, stipulated between the Duchy of Venice ({{Lang|la|Ducatum Venetiae}}) and the [[Carolingian Empire]], ''de facto'' ratified the independence of Venice from the Byzantine Empire.{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=356}}{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=368}}{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=381}} |
||
In the following century, references to Venice as a Byzantine dominion disappeared, and in a document from 976 there is a mention of the most glorious {{Lang|la|Domino Venetiarum}} ('Lord of Venice'), where the 'most glorious' appellative had already been used for the first time in the {{Lang|la|Pactum Lotharii}} and where the appellative "lord" refers to the fact that the doge was still considered like a king, even if elected by the popular assembly.{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=376}} Gaining independence, Venice also began to expand on the coasts of the [[Adriatic Sea]], and so starting from 1109, following the conquest of [[Dalmatia]] and the Croatian coast, the doge formally received the title of {{Lang|la|Venetiae Dalmatiae atque Chroatiae Dux}} ('Doge of Venice, Dalmatia and Croatia'), a name that continued to be used until the 18th century. Starting from the 15th century, the documents written in Latin were joined by those in the [[Venetian language]], and in parallel with the events in Italy, the Duchy of Venice also changed its name, becoming the Lordship of Venice, which as written in the peace treaty of 1453 with Sultan [[Mehmed II]] was fully named the {{Lang|vec| |
In the following century, references to Venice as a Byzantine dominion disappeared, and in a document from 976 there is a mention of the most glorious {{Lang|la|Domino Venetiarum}} ('Lord of Venice'), where the 'most glorious' appellative had already been used for the first time in the {{Lang|la|Pactum Lotharii}} and where the appellative "lord" refers to the fact that the doge was still considered like a king, even if elected by the popular assembly.{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=376}}{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=79}} Gaining independence, Venice also began to expand on the coasts of the [[Adriatic Sea]], and so starting from 1109, following the conquest of [[Dalmatia]] and the Croatian coast, the doge formally received the title of {{Lang|la|Venetiae Dalmatiae atque Chroatiae Dux}} ('Doge of Venice, Dalmatia and Croatia'),{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=74}}{{sfn|Romanin|1853|p=354}} a name that continued to be used until the 18th century.{{sfn|Romanin|1854|p=408}} Starting from the 15th century, the documents written in Latin were joined by those in the [[Venetian language]], and in parallel with the events in Italy, the Duchy of Venice also changed its name, becoming the Lordship of Venice, which as written in the peace treaty of 1453 with Sultan [[Mehmed II]] was fully named the {{Lang|vec|Illustrissima et Excellentissima deta Signoria de Venexia}} ('The Most Illustrious and Excellent Signoria of Venice').{{sfn|Romanin|1855|pp=423–428}} |
||
During the 17th century, monarchical [[Absolutism (European history)|absolutism]] asserted itself in many countries of continental Europe, radically changing the European political landscape. This change made it possible to more markedly determine the differences between |
During the 17th century, monarchical [[Absolutism (European history)|absolutism]] asserted itself in many countries of continental Europe, radically changing the European political landscape. This change made it possible to more markedly determine the differences between monarchies and republics: while the former had economies governed by strict laws and dominated by agriculture, the latter lived off of commercial affairs and free markets. Moreover, the monarchies, in addition to being led by a single ruling family, were more prone to war and religious uniformity. This increasingly noticeable difference between monarchy and republic began to be specified also in official documents, and it was hence that names such as the [[Republic of Genoa]] or the [[Dutch Republic|Republic of the Seven United Provinces]] were born. The Lordship of Venice also adapted to this new terminology, becoming the Most Serene Republic of Venice ({{lang-it|Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia}}; {{lang-vec|Serenìsima Repùblega de Venexia|links=no}}), a name by which it is best known today.{{sfn|Romanin|1858|pp=569–573}}{{sfn|Romanin|1858|p=605}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|p=408}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|p=430}} Similarly, the doge was also given the nickname of {{Lang|it|serenissimo}}{{sfn|Romanin|1854|p=408}} or more simply that of ''[[Serene Highness|His Serenity]]''.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|p=492}} From the 17th century the Republic of Venice took on other more or less official names such as the Venetian State or the Venetian Republic. The republic is often referred to as ''La Serenissima'', in reference to its title as one of the "[[Most Serene Republic]]s".{{sfn|Romanin|1855|p=544}} |
||
==History== |
==History== |
||
{{main|History of the Republic of Venice|Timeline of the Republic of Venice}} |
{{main|History of the Republic of Venice|Timeline of the Republic of Venice}} |
||
=== |
===9th–10th century: The ducal age=== |
||
{{Main|Maritime Venice}} |
{{Main|Maritime Venice}} |
||
[[File:Torcello, cattedrale di santa maria assunta, esterno 01.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Torcello Cathedral|Church of Santa Maria Assunta]], on the island of [[Torcello]], was the main place of worship in the [[Venetian Lagoon]] between the 7th and 9th centuries.]] |
[[File:Torcello, cattedrale di santa maria assunta, esterno 01.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Torcello Cathedral|Church of Santa Maria Assunta]], on the island of [[Torcello]], was the main place of worship in the [[Venetian Lagoon]] between the 7th and 9th centuries.]] |
||
The Duchy of Venice was born in the |
The Duchy of Venice was born in the 9th century from the [[Exarchate of Ravenna|Byzantine territories]] of [[Maritime Venice]]. According to tradition, the [[Paolo Lucio Anafesto|first doge]] was elected in 697, but this figure is of dubious historicity and comparable to that of the [[Paul (exarch)|exarch Paul]], who, similarly to the doge, was assassinated in 727 following a revolt. Father Pietro Antonio of Venetia, in his history of the lagoon city published in 1688, writes: "The precise time in which that family arrived in the Adria is not found, but rather, what already an inhabitant of the islands, by the princes, who welcomed citizens, and supported with the advantage of significant riches, in the year 697 she contributed to the nomination of the first Prince Marco Contarini, one of the 22 Tribunes of the Islands, who made the election". In 726, [[List of Byzantine emperors|Emperor]] [[Leo III the Isaurian|Leo III]] attempted to extend [[iconoclasm]] to the Exarchate of Ravenna, causing numerous revolts throughout the territory. In reaction to the reform, the local populations appointed several ''[[duces]]'' to replace the Byzantine governors and in particular ''Venetia'' appointed [[Orso Ipato|Orso]] as its doge, who governed the lagoon for a decade. Following his death, the Byzantines entrusted the government of the province to the regime of the ''magistri militum'', which lasted until 742 when the emperor granted the people the appointment of a ''dux''. The Venetians elected by acclamation [[Teodato Ipato|Theodato]], son of Orso, who decided to move the capital of the duchy from ''Heraclia'' to ''[[Malamocco|Metamauco]]''.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=24–26}} |
||
The Lombard conquest of Ravenna in 751 and the subsequent conquest of the [[Kingdom of the Lombards|Lombard kingdom]] by [[Charlemagne]]'s [[Franks]] in 774, with the creation of the [[Carolingian Empire]] in 800, considerably changed the geopolitical context of the lagoon, leading the Venetians to divide into two factions : a pro-Frankish party led by the city of ''Equilium'' and a pro-Byzantine party with a stronghold in ''Heraclia''. After a long series of skirmishes in 805, Doge [[Obelerio degli Antenori|Obelerio]] decided to attack both cities simultaneously, deporting their population to the capital. Having taken control of the situation, the doge placed ''Venezia'' under Frankish protection, but a Byzantine naval blockade convinced him to renew his loyalty to the Eastern Emperor. With the intention of conquering ''Venezia'' in 810, the Frankish army commanded by [[Pepin of Italy|Pepin]] invaded the lagoon, forcing the local population to retreat to ''[[Rialto|Rivoalto]]'', thus starting a siege which ended with the arrival of the Byzantine fleet and the retreat of the Franks. Following the failed Frankish conquest, Doge Obelerio was replaced by the pro-Byzantine nobleman [[Agnello Participazio]] who definitively moved the capital to ''Rivoalto'' in 812, thus decreeing the birth of the city of [[Venice]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=27–31}} |
The Lombard conquest of Ravenna in 751 and the subsequent conquest of the [[Kingdom of the Lombards|Lombard kingdom]] by [[Charlemagne]]'s [[Franks]] in 774, with the creation of the [[Carolingian Empire]] in 800, considerably changed the geopolitical context of the lagoon, leading the Venetians to divide into two factions : a pro-Frankish party led by the city of ''Equilium'' and a pro-Byzantine party with a stronghold in ''Heraclia''. After a long series of skirmishes in 805, Doge [[Obelerio degli Antenori|Obelerio]] decided to attack both cities simultaneously, deporting their population to the capital. Having taken control of the situation, the doge placed ''Venezia'' under Frankish protection, but a Byzantine naval blockade convinced him to renew his loyalty to the Eastern Emperor. With the intention of conquering ''Venezia'' in 810, the Frankish army commanded by [[Pepin of Italy|Pepin]] invaded the lagoon, forcing the local population to retreat to ''[[Rialto|Rivoalto]]'', thus starting a siege which ended with the arrival of the Byzantine fleet and the retreat of the Franks. Following the failed Frankish conquest, Doge Obelerio was replaced by the pro-Byzantine nobleman [[Agnello Participazio]] who definitively moved the capital to ''Rivoalto'' in 812, thus decreeing the birth of the city of [[Venice]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=27–31}} |
||
Line 128: | Line 120: | ||
The ''Concio'' managed to elect six doges up to [[Pietro III Candiano]] who in 958 assigned the position of ''co-dux'' to his son Pietro who became doge the following year. Due to his land holdings, [[Pietro IV Candiano]] had a political vision close to that of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] and consequently attempted to establish [[feudalism]] in Venice as well, causing a revolt in 976 which led to the burning of the capital and the killing of the doge.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=46–48}} These events led the [[Venetian nobility|Venetian patriciate]] to gain a growing influence on the doge's policies and the conflicts that arose following the doge's assassination were resolved only in 991 with the election of [[Pietro II Orseolo]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=51–53}} |
The ''Concio'' managed to elect six doges up to [[Pietro III Candiano]] who in 958 assigned the position of ''co-dux'' to his son Pietro who became doge the following year. Due to his land holdings, [[Pietro IV Candiano]] had a political vision close to that of the [[Holy Roman Empire]] and consequently attempted to establish [[feudalism]] in Venice as well, causing a revolt in 976 which led to the burning of the capital and the killing of the doge.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=46–48}} These events led the [[Venetian nobility|Venetian patriciate]] to gain a growing influence on the doge's policies and the conflicts that arose following the doge's assassination were resolved only in 991 with the election of [[Pietro II Orseolo]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=51–53}} |
||
=== |
===11th–12th century: Relations with the Byzantine Empire=== |
||
{{Main|Venetian Crusade}} |
|||
[[File:Privilegi della Bolla d'Oro del 1082.svg|thumb|right|The commercial ports included in the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|chrystobol of 1082]]]] |
[[File:Privilegi della Bolla d'Oro del 1082.svg|thumb|right|The commercial ports included in the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|chrystobol of 1082]]]] |
||
[[File:Torcello, santa fosca, esterno 01.jpg|thumb|right|The church of Santa Fosca, built in the 12th century, is an example of [[Byzantine architecture|Byzantine]] influence in Venetian culture.]] |
[[File:Torcello, santa fosca, esterno 01.jpg|thumb|right|The church of Santa Fosca, built in the 12th century, is an example of [[Byzantine architecture|Byzantine]] influence in Venetian culture.]] |
||
Pietro II Orseolo gave a notable boost to Venetian commercial expansion by stipulating new commercial privileges with the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. In addition to diplomacy, the doge resumed the war against the Narentan pirates that began in the 9th century and in the year 1000 he managed to subjugate the coastal cities of [[Istria]] and Dalmatia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=53–55}} The [[East–West Schism|Great Schism]] of 1054 and the outbreak of the [[Investiture Controversy|investiture struggle]] in 1073 marginally involved Venetian politics which instead focused its attention on the arrival of the [[Normans]] in southern Italy. The Norman occupation of [[Durrës]] and [[Corfu]] in 1081 pushed the Byzantine Empire to request the aid of the Venetian fleet which, with the promise of obtaining extensive commercial privileges and reimbursement of military expenses, decided to take part in the [[Byzantine-Norman wars]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=62–64}} The following year, Emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]] granted Venice the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|chrysobol]], a commercial privilege that allowed Venetian merchants substantial tax exemptions in numerous Byzantine ports and the establishment of a Venetian neighbourhood in Durrës and [[Constantinople]]. The war ended in 1085 when, following the death of the leader [[Robert Guiscard]], the Norman army abandoned its positions to return to Puglia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=65–67}} |
Pietro II Orseolo gave a notable boost to Venetian commercial expansion by stipulating new commercial privileges with the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. In addition to diplomacy, the doge resumed the war against the Narentan pirates that began in the 9th century and in the year 1000 he managed to subjugate the coastal cities of [[Istria]] and Dalmatia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=53–55}} The [[East–West Schism|Great Schism]] of 1054 and the outbreak of the [[Investiture Controversy|investiture struggle]] in 1073 marginally involved Venetian politics which instead focused its attention on the arrival of the [[Normans]] in southern Italy. The Norman occupation of [[Durrës]] and [[Corfu]] in 1081 pushed the Byzantine Empire to request the aid of the Venetian fleet which, with the promise of obtaining extensive commercial privileges and reimbursement of military expenses, decided to take part in the [[Byzantine-Norman wars]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=62–64}} The following year, Emperor [[Alexios I Komnenos]] granted Venice the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|chrysobol]], a commercial privilege that allowed Venetian merchants substantial tax exemptions in numerous Byzantine ports and the establishment of a Venetian neighbourhood in Durrës and [[Constantinople]]. The war ended in 1085 when, following the death of the leader [[Robert Guiscard]], the Norman army abandoned its positions to return to Puglia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=65–67}} |
||
Having taken office in 1118, Emperor [[John II Komnenos]] decided not to renew the chrysobol of 1082, arousing the reaction of Venice which declared war on the Byzantine Empire in 1122. The war ended in 1126 with the victory of Venice which forced the emperor to stipulate a new agreement characterized by even better conditions than the previous ones, thus making the Byzantine Empire totally dependent on Venetian trade and protection.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=71–73}} With the intention of weakening the growing Venetian power, the emperor provided substantial commercial support to the [[maritime republics]] of [[Republic of Ancona|Ancona]], [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]] and [[Republic of Pisa|Pisa]], making coexistence with Venice, which was now hegemonic on the [[Adriatic Sea]], increasingly difficult, so much so that it was renamed the "Gulf of Venice". In 1171, following the emperor's decision to expel the Venetian merchants from Constantinople, a [[Byzantine–Venetian war of 1171|new war]] broke out which was resolved with the restoration of the '' |
Having taken office in 1118, Emperor [[John II Komnenos]] decided not to renew the chrysobol of 1082, arousing the reaction of Venice which declared war on the Byzantine Empire in 1122. The war ended in 1126 with the victory of Venice which forced the emperor to stipulate a new agreement characterized by even better conditions than the previous ones, thus making the Byzantine Empire totally dependent on Venetian trade and protection.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=71–73}} With the intention of weakening the growing Venetian power, the emperor provided substantial commercial support to the [[maritime republics]] of [[Republic of Ancona|Ancona]], [[Republic of Genoa|Genoa]] and [[Republic of Pisa|Pisa]], making coexistence with Venice, which was now hegemonic on the [[Adriatic Sea]], increasingly difficult, so much so that it was renamed the "Gulf of Venice". In 1171, following the emperor's decision to expel the Venetian merchants from Constantinople, a [[Byzantine–Venetian war of 1171|new war]] broke out which was resolved with the restoration of the ''status quo''.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=82–83}} At the end of the 12th century, the commercial traffic of Venetian merchants extended throughout the East and they could count on immense and solid capital.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=91–93}} |
||
As in the rest of Italy, starting from the |
As in the rest of Italy, starting from the 12th century, Venice also underwent the transformations that led to the age of the [[Medieval commune|municipalities]]. In that century, the doge's power began to decline: initially supported only by a few judges, in 1130 it was decided to place the ''Consilium Sapientium'', which would later become the [[Great Council of Venice]], alongside his power. In the same period, in addition to the expulsion of the clergy from public life, new assemblies such as the [[Council of Forty]] and the [[Minor Council]] were established and in his inauguration speech the Doge was forced to declare loyalty to the Republic with the ''[[promissione ducale]]'';{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=117–118}} thus the [[Commune of Venice]], the set of all the assemblies aimed at regulating the power of the doge, began to take shape.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=80–81}} |
||
=== |
===13th–14th century: The Crusades and the rivalry with Genoa=== |
||
{{Main|Venetian–Genoese wars}} |
{{Main|Venetian–Genoese wars}} |
||
{{Main|Battle of Adramyttion (1334)|Smyrniote crusades}} |
|||
[[File:Venezia flotila.png|thumb|right|The Venetian fleet heads towards Constantinople and then besieges it on 12 April 1204.]] |
[[File:Venezia flotila.png|thumb|right|The Venetian fleet heads towards Constantinople and then besieges it on 12 April 1204.]] |
||
In the 12th century, Venice decided not to participate in the [[Crusades]] due to its commercial interests in the East and instead concentrated on maintaining its possessions in Dalmatia which were repeatedly besieged by the [[Kingdom of Hungary|Hungarians]]. The situation changed in 1202 when the Doge [[Enrico Dandolo]] decided to exploit the expedition of the [[Fourth Crusade]] to conclude the Zara War and the following year, after twenty years of conflict, Venice [[Siege of Zara|conquered the city]] and won the war, regaining control of Dalmatia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=102–103}} The Venetian crusader fleet, however, did not stop in Dalmatia, but continued towards Constantinople to [[Sack of Constantinople|besiege it in 1204]], thus putting an end to the Byzantine Empire and formally making Venice an independent state, severing the last ties with the former Byzantine ruler.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=110–111}} The [[Frankokratia|empire was dismembered]] in the Crusader states and from the division Venice obtained numerous ports in the [[Peloponnese|Morea]] and several islands in the [[Aegean Sea]] including [[Crete]] and [[Euboea]], thus giving life to the ''[[Stato da Màr]]''. In addition to the territorial conquests, the doge was awarded the title of Lord of a quarter and a half of the Eastern Roman Empire, thus obtaining the faculty of appointing the [[Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople]] and the possibility of sending a Venetian representative to the government of the Eastern [[Latin Empire]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=114–115}} With the end of the Fourth Crusade, Venice concentrated its efforts on the conquest of Crete, which intensely involved the Venetian army until 1237.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=120}} |
In the 12th century, Venice decided not to participate in the [[Crusades]] due to its commercial interests in the East and instead concentrated on maintaining its possessions in Dalmatia which were repeatedly besieged by the [[Kingdom of Hungary|Hungarians]]. The situation changed in 1202 when the Doge [[Enrico Dandolo]] decided to exploit the expedition of the [[Fourth Crusade]] to conclude the Zara War and the following year, after twenty years of conflict, Venice [[Siege of Zara|conquered the city]] and won the war, regaining control of Dalmatia.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=102–103}} The Venetian crusader fleet, however, did not stop in Dalmatia, but continued towards Constantinople to [[Sack of Constantinople|besiege it in 1204]], thus putting an end to the Byzantine Empire and formally making Venice an independent state, severing the last ties with the former Byzantine ruler.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=110–111}} The [[Frankokratia|empire was dismembered]] in the Crusader states and from the division Venice obtained numerous ports in the [[Peloponnese|Morea]] and several islands in the [[Aegean Sea]] including [[Crete]] and [[Euboea]], thus giving life to the ''[[Stato da Màr]]''. In addition to the territorial conquests, the doge was awarded the title of Lord of a quarter and a half of the Eastern Roman Empire, thus obtaining the faculty of appointing the [[Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople]] and the possibility of sending a Venetian representative to the government of the Eastern [[Latin Empire]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=114–115}} With the end of the Fourth Crusade, Venice concentrated its efforts on the conquest of Crete, which intensely involved the Venetian army until 1237.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=120}} |
||
Venice's control over the eastern trade routes became pressing and this caused an increase in conflicts with Genoa which in 1255 exploded into the [[War of Saint Sabas]]; on 24 June 1258 the two republics faced each other in the [[ Battle of Acre (1258)|Battle of Acre]] which ended with an overwhelming Venetian victory. In 1261 the [[Empire of Nicaea]] with the help of the Republic of Genoa managed to dissolve the Eastern Latin Empire and re-establish the Byzantine Empire. The war between Genoa and Venice resumed and after a long series of battles the war ended in 1270 with the [[Peace of Cremona (1270)|Peace of Cremona]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=128–132}} In 1281 Venice defeated the Republic of Ancona in battle and in 1293 a new [[Byzantine–Venetian War (1296–1302)|war between Genoa, the Byzantine Empire and Venice]] broke out, won by the Genoese following the [[Battle of Curzola]] and ending in 1299.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=138–140}} |
Venice's control over the eastern trade routes became pressing and this caused an increase in conflicts with Genoa which in 1255 exploded into the [[War of Saint Sabas]]; on 24 June 1258 the two republics faced each other in the [[ Battle of Acre (1258)|Battle of Acre]] which ended with an overwhelming Venetian victory. In 1261 the [[Empire of Nicaea]] with the help of the Republic of Genoa managed to dissolve the Eastern Latin Empire and re-establish the Byzantine Empire. The war between Genoa and Venice resumed and after a long series of battles the war ended in 1270 with the [[Peace of Cremona (1270)|Peace of Cremona]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=128–132}} In 1281 Venice defeated the Republic of Ancona in battle and in 1293 a new [[Byzantine–Venetian War (1296–1302)|war between Genoa, the Byzantine Empire and Venice]] broke out, won by the Genoese following the [[Battle of Curzola]] and ending in 1299.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=138–140}} |
||
During the war, various administrative reforms were implemented in Venice, new assemblies were established to replace popular ones such as the [[Venetian Senate|Senate]] and in the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]] power began to concentrate in the hands of about ten families. |
During the war, various administrative reforms were implemented in Venice, new assemblies were established to replace popular ones such as the [[Venetian Senate|Senate]] and in the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]] power began to concentrate in the hands of about ten families. To avoid the birth of a lordship, the Doge decided to increase the number of members of the Maggior Consiglio while leaving the number of families unchanged and so the [[Serrata del Maggior Consiglio]] was implemented in 1297.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=142–144}} Following the provision, the power of some of the old houses decreased and in 1310, under the pretext of defeat in the Ferrara War, these families organized themselves in the Tiepolo conspiracy.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=147–149}} Once the coup d'état failed and the establishment of a lordship was averted, Doge [[Pietro Gradenigo]] established the [[Council of Ten]], which was assigned the task of repressing any threat to the security of the state.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=153}} |
||
In the Venetian hinterland, the war waged by [[Mastino II della Scala]] caused serious economic losses to Venetian trade, so in 1336 Venice gave birth to the anti-Scaliger league. The following year the coalition expanded further and [[Padua]] returned to the dominion of the [[Carraresi]]. In 1338, Venice conquered [[Treviso]], the first nucleus of the ''[[Domini di Terraferma]]'', and in 1339 it signed a peace treaty in which the [[Scaliger]]i promised not to interfere in Venetian trade and to recognize the sovereignty of Venice over the Trevisan March.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=172–173}} |
In the Venetian hinterland, the war waged by [[Mastino II della Scala]] caused serious economic losses to Venetian trade, so in 1336 Venice gave birth to the anti-Scaliger league. The following year the coalition expanded further and [[Padua]] returned to the dominion of the [[Carraresi]]. In 1338, Venice conquered [[Treviso]], the first nucleus of the ''[[Domini di Terraferma]]'', and in 1339 it signed a peace treaty in which the [[Scaliger]]i promised not to interfere in Venetian trade and to recognize the sovereignty of Venice over the Trevisan March.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=172–173}} |
||
Line 171: | Line 167: | ||
===16th century: League of Cambrai, the loss of Cyprus, and Battle of Lepanto=== |
===16th century: League of Cambrai, the loss of Cyprus, and Battle of Lepanto=== |
||
[[File:The battle of Cadore.jpg|thumb|The [[Battle of Cadore]], which triggered the [[War of the League of Cambrai]]]] |
[[File:The battle of Cadore.jpg|thumb|The [[Battle of Cadore]], which triggered the [[War of the League of Cambrai]]]] |
||
[[Image:Jacopo Tintoretto 037.jpg|thumb|Captain General of the Sea [[Sebastiano Venier]] at [[Battle of Lepanto|Lepanto]]]] |
|||
[[Ottoman–Venetian War (1499–1503)|War with the Ottomans]] resumed from 1499 to 1503. In 1499, Venice allied itself with [[Louis XII]] of France against Milan, gaining [[Cremona]]. In the same year, the Ottoman sultan moved to attack [[Nafpaktos|Lepanto]] by land and sent a large fleet to support his offensive by sea. [[Antonio Grimani]], more a businessman and diplomat than a sailor, was defeated in the sea [[battle of Zonchio]] in 1499. The Turks once again sacked Friuli. Preferring peace to total war both against the Turks and by sea, Venice surrendered the bases of Lepanto, [[Durrës|Durazzo]], [[Methoni, Messenia|Modon]], and [[Koroni|Coron]]. |
[[Ottoman–Venetian War (1499–1503)|War with the Ottomans]] resumed from 1499 to 1503. In 1499, Venice allied itself with [[Louis XII]] of France against Milan, gaining [[Cremona]]. In the same year, the Ottoman sultan moved to attack [[Nafpaktos|Lepanto]] by land and sent a large fleet to support his offensive by sea. [[Antonio Grimani]], more a businessman and diplomat than a sailor, was defeated in the sea [[battle of Zonchio]] in 1499. The Turks once again sacked Friuli. Preferring peace to total war both against the Turks and by sea, Venice surrendered the bases of Lepanto, [[Durrës|Durazzo]], [[Methoni, Messenia|Modon]], and [[Koroni|Coron]]. |
||
Line 176: | Line 173: | ||
Venice's attention was diverted from its usual maritime position by the delicate situation in [[Romagna]], then one of the richest lands in Italy, which was nominally part of the [[Papal States]], but effectively divided into a series of small lordships which were difficult for Rome's troops to control. Eager to take some of Venice's lands, all neighbouring powers joined in the [[League of Cambrai]] in 1508, under the leadership of [[Pope Julius II]]. The pope wanted [[Romagna]]; Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian I]]: Friuli and [[Veneto]]; Spain: the [[Apulia]]n ports; the king of France: Cremona; the [[king of Hungary]]: Dalmatia, and each one some of another's part. The offensive against the huge army enlisted by Venice was launched from France. |
Venice's attention was diverted from its usual maritime position by the delicate situation in [[Romagna]], then one of the richest lands in Italy, which was nominally part of the [[Papal States]], but effectively divided into a series of small lordships which were difficult for Rome's troops to control. Eager to take some of Venice's lands, all neighbouring powers joined in the [[League of Cambrai]] in 1508, under the leadership of [[Pope Julius II]]. The pope wanted [[Romagna]]; Emperor [[Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor|Maximilian I]]: Friuli and [[Veneto]]; Spain: the [[Apulia]]n ports; the king of France: Cremona; the [[king of Hungary]]: Dalmatia, and each one some of another's part. The offensive against the huge army enlisted by Venice was launched from France. |
||
On 14 May 1509, Venice was crushingly defeated at the [[battle of Agnadello]], in the Ghiara d'Adda, marking one of the most delicate points in Venetian history. French and imperial troops were occupying Veneto, but Venice managed to extricate itself through diplomatic efforts. The Apulian ports were ceded |
On 14 May 1509, Venice was crushingly defeated at the [[battle of Agnadello]], in the Ghiara d'Adda, marking one of the most delicate points in Venetian history. French and imperial troops were occupying Veneto, but Venice managed to extricate itself through diplomatic efforts. The Apulian ports were ceded to come to terms with Spain, and Julius II soon recognized the danger brought by the eventual destruction of Venice (then the only Italian power able to face kingdoms like France or empires like the Ottomans). |
||
The citizens of the mainland rose to the cry of "Marco, Marco", and [[Andrea Gritti]] recaptured Padua in July 1509, successfully defending it against the besieging imperial troops. Spain and the pope broke off their alliance with France, and Venice regained Brescia and Verona from France, also. After seven years of ruinous war, the Serenissima regained its mainland dominions west to the [[Adda (river)|Adda River]]. Although the defeat had turned into a victory, the events of 1509 marked the end of the Venetian expansion. |
The citizens of the mainland rose to the cry of "Marco, Marco", and [[Andrea Gritti]] recaptured Padua in July 1509, successfully defending it against the besieging imperial troops. Spain and the pope broke off their alliance with France, and Venice regained Brescia and Verona from France, also. After seven years of ruinous war, the Serenissima regained its mainland dominions west to the [[Adda (river)|Adda River]]. Although the defeat had turned into a victory, the events of 1509 marked the end of the Venetian expansion. |
||
Line 182: | Line 179: | ||
In 1489, the first year of Venetian control of Cyprus, Turks attacked the [[Karpasia Peninsula]], pillaging and taking captives to be sold into slavery. In 1539, the Turkish fleet attacked and destroyed [[Limassol]]. Fearing the ever-expanding Ottoman Empire, the Venetians had fortified [[Famagusta]], [[Nicosia]], and [[Kyrenia]], but most other cities were easy prey. By 1563, the population of Venice had dropped to about 168,000 people.{{sfn|Norwich|1982|p=494}} |
In 1489, the first year of Venetian control of Cyprus, Turks attacked the [[Karpasia Peninsula]], pillaging and taking captives to be sold into slavery. In 1539, the Turkish fleet attacked and destroyed [[Limassol]]. Fearing the ever-expanding Ottoman Empire, the Venetians had fortified [[Famagusta]], [[Nicosia]], and [[Kyrenia]], but most other cities were easy prey. By 1563, the population of Venice had dropped to about 168,000 people.{{sfn|Norwich|1982|p=494}} |
||
[[File:Jacopo Tintoretto 037.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|left|[[Sebastiano Venier]], commander of the Venetian fleet at the [[Battle of Lepanto]]]] |
|||
In the summer of 1570, the Turks struck again but this time with a [[Ottoman–Venetian War (1570–1573)|full-scale invasion]] rather than a raid. About 60,000 troops, including cavalry and artillery, under the command of [[Lala Mustafa Pasha|Mustafa Pasha]] landed unopposed near Limassol on 2 July 1570 and laid siege to Nicosia. In an orgy of victory on the day that the city fell – 9 September 1570 – 20,000 Nicosians were put to death, and every church, public building, and palace was looted.<ref>{{cite book | last=Turnbull | first=Stephen | title=The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699| publisher=Routledge | year=2003 | isbn=978-0-415-96913-0 |page=58}}</ref> Word of the massacre spread, and a few days later, Mustafa took Kyrenia without having to fire a shot. Famagusta, however, resisted and put up a defense that lasted from September 1570 until August 1571. |
In the summer of 1570, the Turks struck again but this time with a [[Ottoman–Venetian War (1570–1573)|full-scale invasion]] rather than a raid. About 60,000 troops, including cavalry and artillery, under the command of [[Lala Mustafa Pasha|Mustafa Pasha]] landed unopposed near Limassol on 2 July 1570 and laid siege to Nicosia. In an orgy of victory on the day that the city fell – 9 September 1570 – 20,000 Nicosians were put to death, and every church, public building, and palace was looted.<ref>{{cite book | last=Turnbull | first=Stephen | title=The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699| publisher=Routledge | year=2003 | isbn=978-0-415-96913-0 |page=58}}</ref> Word of the massacre spread, and a few days later, Mustafa took Kyrenia without having to fire a shot. Famagusta, however, resisted and put up a defense that lasted from September 1570 until August 1571. |
||
Line 190: | Line 186: | ||
{{See also|Cretan War (1645–1669)|Morean War}} |
{{See also|Cretan War (1645–1669)|Morean War}} |
||
[[File: |
[[File:MBoschini Il regno tutto di Candia.jpg|thumb|left|The [[siege of Candia]], during the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)|Cretan War]], was from 1648 to 1669 the second longest siege in history]] |
||
[[File:Lorenzo-marcello.jpg|thumb|left|Captain General of the Sea [[Lorenzo Marcello]] at the [[Battle of the Dardanelles (1656)|Dardanelles]]]] |
|||
According to economic historian Jan De Vries, Venice's economic power in the Mediterranean had declined significantly by the start of the 17th century. De Vries attributes this decline to the loss of the [[spice trade]], a declining uncompetitive textile industry, competition in book publishing from a rejuvenated Catholic Church, the adverse impact of the [[Thirty Years' War]] on Venice's key trade partners, and the increasing cost of cotton and silk imports to Venice.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://admin.cambridge.org/academic/subjects/history/european-history-after-1450/economy-europe-age-crisis-16001750?format=AR |title=Europe in an age of crisis 1600–1750|last=De Vries |first=Jan|website=Cambridge University Press|page=26|language=en |access-date=2018-09-02|archive-date=3 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180903051306/http://admin.cambridge.org/academic/subjects/history/european-history-after-1450/economy-europe-age-crisis-16001750?format=AR|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
According to economic historian Jan De Vries, Venice's economic power in the Mediterranean had declined significantly by the start of the 17th century. De Vries attributes this decline to the loss of the [[spice trade]], a declining uncompetitive textile industry, competition in book publishing from a rejuvenated Catholic Church, the adverse impact of the [[Thirty Years' War]] on Venice's key trade partners, and the increasing cost of cotton and silk imports to Venice.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://admin.cambridge.org/academic/subjects/history/european-history-after-1450/economy-europe-age-crisis-16001750?format=AR |title=Europe in an age of crisis 1600–1750|last=De Vries |first=Jan|website=Cambridge University Press|page=26|language=en |access-date=2018-09-02|archive-date=3 September 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180903051306/http://admin.cambridge.org/academic/subjects/history/european-history-after-1450/economy-europe-age-crisis-16001750?format=AR|url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
In 1606, a conflict between Venice and the [[Holy See]] began with the arrest of two clerics accused of petty crimes and with a law restricting the Church's right to enjoy and acquire landed property. [[Pope Paul V]] held that these provisions were contrary to [[Canon law of the Catholic Church|canon law]], and demanded that they be repealed. When this was refused, he placed Venice under an [[interdict]] which forbade clergymen from exercising almost all priestly duties. The republic paid no attention to the interdict or the act of [[excommunication]] and ordered its priests to carry out their ministry. It was supported in its decisions by the [[Servite Order|Servite]] friar [[Paolo Sarpi]], a sharp polemical writer who was nominated to be the Signoria's adviser on theology and canon law in 1606. The interdict was lifted after a year, when France intervened and proposed a formula of compromise. Venice was satisfied with reaffirming the principle that no citizen was superior to the normal processes of law.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4QklDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA151|title=The Jesuits and Italian Universities, 1548–1773|publisher=Catholic University of America Press|year=2017|isbn=978-0813229362|page=151|access-date=5 January 2022|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221002112343/https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Jesuits_and_Italian_Universities_154/4QklDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA151&printsec=frontcover|archive-date=2 October 2022}}</ref> |
In 1606, a conflict between Venice and the [[Holy See]] began with the arrest of two clerics accused of petty crimes and with a law restricting the Church's right to enjoy and acquire landed property. [[Pope Paul V]] held that these provisions were contrary to [[Canon law of the Catholic Church|canon law]], and demanded that they be repealed. When this was refused, he placed Venice under an [[interdict]] which forbade clergymen from exercising almost all priestly duties. The republic paid no attention to the interdict or the act of [[excommunication]] and ordered its priests to carry out their ministry. It was supported in its decisions by the [[Servite Order|Servite]] friar [[Paolo Sarpi]], a sharp polemical writer who was nominated to be the Signoria's adviser on theology and canon law in 1606. The interdict was lifted after a year, when France intervened and proposed a formula of compromise. Venice was satisfied with reaffirming the principle that no citizen was superior to the normal processes of law.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4QklDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA151|title=The Jesuits and Italian Universities, 1548–1773|publisher=Catholic University of America Press|year=2017|isbn=978-0813229362|page=151|access-date=5 January 2022|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221002112343/https://www.google.ca/books/edition/The_Jesuits_and_Italian_Universities_154/4QklDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA151&printsec=frontcover|archive-date=2 October 2022}}</ref> |
||
Rivalry with [[Habsburg Spain]] and the [[Holy Roman Empire]] led to Venice's last significant wars in Italy and the northern Adriatic. Between 1615 and 1618 Venice fought [[Ferdinand II, Archduke of Austria|Archduke Ferdinand]] of Austria in the [[Uskok War]] in the northern Adriatic and on the Republic's eastern border, while in Lombardy to the west, Venetian troops skirmished with the forces of [[Pedro de Toledo Osorio, 5th Marquess of Villafranca|Don Pedro de Toledo Osorio]], Spanish governor of Milan, around [[Crema, Lombardy|Crema]] in 1617 and in the countryside of [[Romano di Lombardia]] in 1618. A fragile peace did not last, and in 1629 the Most Serene Republic returned to war with Spain and the Holy Roman Empire in the [[War of the Mantuan Succession]]. During the brief war a Venetian army led by provveditore Zaccaria Sagredo and reinforced by French allies was disastrously routed by Imperial forces at the [[battle of Villabuona]], and Venice's closest ally [[Mantua]] was sacked. Reversals elsewhere for the Holy Roman Empire and Spain ensured the republic suffered no territorial loss, and the [[duchy of Mantua]] was restored to [[Charles II Gonzaga, Duke of Nevers]], who was the candidate backed by Venice and France. |
|||
[[File:MBoschini Il regno tutto di Candia.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|left |The [[siege of Candia]] during the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)|Cretan War]] was the second longest siege in history, lasting from 1648 to 1669 for a total of 21 years]] |
|||
Rivalry with [[Habsburg Spain]] and the [[Holy Roman Empire]] led to Venice's last significant wars in Italy and the northern Adriatic. Between 1615 and 1618 Venice fought [[Ferdinand II, Archduke of Austria|Archduke Ferdinand]] of Austria in the [[Uskok War|Uskok war]] in the northern Adriatic and on the Republic's eastern border, while in Lombardy to the west, Venetian troops skirmished with the forces of [[Pedro de Toledo Osorio, 5th Marquess of Villafranca|Don Pedro de Toledo Osorio]], Spanish governor of Milan, around [[Crema, Lombardy|Crema]] in 1617 and in the countryside of [[Romano di Lombardia]] in 1618. A fragile peace did not last, and in 1629 the Most Serene Republic returned to war with Spain and the Holy Roman Empire in the [[War of the Mantuan Succession|War of the Mantuan succession]]. During the brief war a Venetian army led by provveditore Zaccaria Sagredo and reinforced by French allies was disastrously routed by Imperial forces at the [[battle of Villabuona]], and Venice's closest ally [[Mantua]] was sacked. Reversals elsewhere for the Holy Roman Empire and Spain ensured the republic suffered no territorial loss, and the [[duchy of Mantua]] was restored to [[Charles II Gonzaga, Duke of Nevers]], who was the candidate backed by Venice and France. |
|||
The latter half of the 17th century also had prolonged wars with the Ottoman Empire; in the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)]], after a heroic siege that lasted 21 years, Venice lost its major overseas possession{{snd}}the island of Crete (although it kept the control of the bases of Spinalonga and Suda){{snd}}while it made some advances in Dalmatia. In 1684, however, taking advantage of the Ottoman involvement against Austria in the [[Great Turkish War]], the republic initiated the [[Morean War]], which lasted until 1699 and in which it was able to conquer the [[Morea]] peninsula in southern Greece. |
The latter half of the 17th century also had prolonged wars with the Ottoman Empire; in the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)]], after a heroic siege that lasted 21 years, Venice lost its major overseas possession{{snd}}the island of Crete (although it kept the control of the bases of Spinalonga and Suda){{snd}}while it made some advances in Dalmatia. In 1684, however, taking advantage of the Ottoman involvement against Austria in the [[Great Turkish War]], the republic initiated the [[Morean War]], which lasted until 1699 and in which it was able to conquer the [[Morea]] peninsula in southern Greece. |
||
===18th century: Decline=== |
===18th century: Decline=== |
||
{{Main|Ottoman–Venetian War (1714–1718)}} |
|||
[[File:The death of Admiral Lodovico Flangini.jpg|thumb|The death of [[Lodovico Flangini]] on board the [[Leon Trionfante-class ship of the line|''Leon Trionfante'']]]] |
|||
[[File:The death of Admiral Lodovico Flangini.jpg|thumb|The death of [[Lodovico Flangini]] on board the [[Leon Trionfante-class ship of the line|Leon Trionfante]] at [[Battle of Imbros (1717)|Imbros]]]] |
|||
These gains did not last, however; in December 1714, the Turks began the last [[Ottoman–Venetian War (1714–1718)|Turkish–Venetian War]], when the Morea was "without any of those supplies which are so desirable even in countries where aid is near at hand which are not liable to attack from the sea".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Zorzi |first1=Alvise |author-link1=Alvise Zorzi |year=1983 |title=Venice: The Golden Age, 697–1797 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IP5OAAAAMAAJ&q=%22even+in+countries+where+aid+is+near+at+hand+%22+%22attack+from+the+sea%22 |location=New York |publisher=Abbeville Press |page=255 |isbn=0896594068 |access-date=28 September 2020 |archive-date=19 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319005256/https://books.google.com/books?id=IP5OAAAAMAAJ&q=%22even+in+countries+where+aid+is+near+at+hand+%22+%22attack+from+the+sea%22 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
These gains did not last, however; in December 1714, the Turks began the last [[Ottoman–Venetian War (1714–1718)|Turkish–Venetian War]], when the Morea was "without any of those supplies which are so desirable even in countries where aid is near at hand which are not liable to attack from the sea".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Zorzi |first1=Alvise |author-link1=Alvise Zorzi |year=1983 |title=Venice: The Golden Age, 697–1797 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IP5OAAAAMAAJ&q=%22even+in+countries+where+aid+is+near+at+hand+%22+%22attack+from+the+sea%22 |location=New York |publisher=Abbeville Press |page=255 |isbn=0896594068 |access-date=28 September 2020 |archive-date=19 March 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210319005256/https://books.google.com/books?id=IP5OAAAAMAAJ&q=%22even+in+countries+where+aid+is+near+at+hand+%22+%22attack+from+the+sea%22 |url-status=live }}</ref> |
||
[[File:Angelo Emo Capodilista.jpg|thumb|upright=0.8|left|[[Angelo Emo]], the last Grand Admiral ([[Capitano Generale da Mar]]) of the Republic]] |
|||
The Turks took the islands of [[Tinos]] and [[Aegina]], crossed the isthmus, and took [[Corinth]]. Daniele Dolfin, commander of the Venetian fleet, thought it better to save the fleet than risk it for the Morea. When he eventually arrived on the scene, Nauplia, Modon, Corone, and Malvasia had fallen. Levkas in the [[Ionian islands]], and the bases of [[Spinalonga]] and [[Souda|Suda]] on Crete, which still remained in Venetian hands, were abandoned. The Turks finally landed on [[Corfu]], but its defenders managed to throw them back. |
The Turks took the islands of [[Tinos]] and [[Aegina]], crossed the isthmus, and took [[Corinth]]. Daniele Dolfin, commander of the Venetian fleet, thought it better to save the fleet than risk it for the Morea. When he eventually arrived on the scene, Nauplia, Modon, Corone, and Malvasia had fallen. Levkas in the [[Ionian islands]], and the bases of [[Spinalonga]] and [[Souda|Suda]] on Crete, which still remained in Venetian hands, were abandoned. The Turks finally landed on [[Corfu]], but its defenders managed to throw them back. |
||
In the meantime, the Turks had suffered a grave defeat by the [[Habsburg monarchy|Austrians]] in the [[Battle of Petrovaradin]] on 5 August 1716. Venetian naval efforts in the [[Aegean Sea]] and the [[Dardanelles]] in 1717 and 1718, however, met with little success. With the [[Treaty of Passarowitz]] (21 July 1718), Austria made large territorial gains, but Venice lost the Morea, for which its small gains in [[Ottoman Albania|Albania]] and Dalmatia were little compensation. This was the last war with the Ottoman Empire. By the year 1792, the once-great Venetian merchant fleet had declined to a mere 309 [[cargo ship|merchantmen]].{{sfn|Norwich|1982|p=591}} Although Venice declined as a seaborne empire, it remained in possession of its continental domain north of the [[Po Valley]], extending west almost to Milan. Many of its cities benefited greatly from the ''Pax Venetiae'' (Venetian peace) throughout the 18th century. |
In the meantime, the Turks had suffered a grave defeat by the [[Habsburg monarchy|Austrians]] in the [[Battle of Petrovaradin]] on 5 August 1716. Venetian naval efforts in the [[Aegean Sea]] and the [[Dardanelles]] in 1717 and 1718, however, met with little success. With the [[Treaty of Passarowitz]] (21 July 1718), Austria made large territorial gains, but Venice lost the Morea, for which its small gains in [[Ottoman Albania|Albania]] and Dalmatia were little compensation. This was the last war with the Ottoman Empire. By the year 1792, the once-great Venetian merchant fleet had declined to a mere 309 [[cargo ship|merchantmen]].{{sfn|Norwich|1982|p=591}} Although Venice declined as a seaborne empire, it remained in possession of its continental domain north of the [[Po Valley]], extending west almost to Milan. Many of its cities benefited greatly from the ''Pax Venetiae'' (Venetian peace) throughout the 18th century. |
||
[[Angelo Emo]] was named the last Captain General of the Sea ([[Capitano Generale da Mar]]) of the Republic in 1784. |
|||
===Fall=== |
===Fall=== |
||
Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
[[File:Manin's abdication.jpg|thumb|A portrait painting the [[fall of the Republic of Venice]] (1797): the abdication of the last [[Doge of Venice|Doge]], [[Ludovico Manin]]]] |
[[File:Manin's abdication.jpg|thumb|A portrait painting the [[fall of the Republic of Venice]] (1797): the abdication of the last [[Doge of Venice|Doge]], [[Ludovico Manin]]]] |
||
By 1796, the Republic of Venice could no longer defend itself since its war fleet numbered only four [[galley]]s and seven [[ |
By 1796, the Republic of Venice could no longer defend itself since its war fleet numbered only four [[galley]]s and seven [[galiot]]s.{{sfn|Norwich|1982|p=615}} In spring 1796, [[Piedmont]] (the [[Duchy of Savoy]]) fell to the invading French, and the Austrians were beaten from [[Montenotte (department)|Montenotte]] to [[Lodi, Lombardy|Lodi]]. The army under [[Napoleon]] crossed the frontiers of neutral Venice in pursuit of the enemy. By the end of the year, the French troops were occupying the Venetian state up to the [[Adige]] River. Vicenza, Cadore and Friuli were held by the Austrians. With the campaigns of the next year, Napoleon aimed for the Austrian possessions across the [[Alps]]. In the preliminaries to the [[Treaty of Leoben|Peace of Leoben]], the terms of which remained secret, the Austrians were to take the Venetian possessions in the [[Balkans]] as the price of peace (18 April 1797) while France acquired the [[Lombardy|Lombard]] part of the state. |
||
After Napoleon's ultimatum, [[Ludovico Manin]] surrendered unconditionally on 12 May and [[abdication|abdicated]], while the Major Council declared the end of the republic. According to Bonaparte's orders, the public powers passed to a provisional municipality under the French military governor. On 17 October, France and Austria signed the [[Treaty of Campo Formio]], agreeing to share all the territory of the republic, with a new border just west of the Adige. Italian democrats, especially young poet [[Ugo Foscolo]], viewed the treaty as a betrayal. The metropolitan part of the disbanded republic became an Austrian territory, under the name of [[Venetian Province]] ({{Lang|it|Provincia Veneta}} in Italian, {{Lang|de|Provinz Venedig}} in German). |
After Napoleon's ultimatum, [[Ludovico Manin]] surrendered unconditionally on 12 May and [[abdication|abdicated]], while the Major Council declared the end of the republic. According to Bonaparte's orders, the public powers passed to a provisional municipality under the French military governor. On 17 October, France and Austria signed the [[Treaty of Campo Formio]], agreeing to share all the territory of the republic, with a new border just west of the Adige. Italian democrats, especially young poet [[Ugo Foscolo]], viewed the treaty as a betrayal. The metropolitan part of the disbanded republic became an Austrian territory, under the name of [[Venetian Province]] ({{Lang|it|Provincia Veneta}} in Italian, {{Lang|de|Provinz Venedig}} in German). |
||
Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
===Legacy=== |
===Legacy=== |
||
Though the economic vitality of the Venetian Republic had started to decline since the 16th century with the movement of international trade towards the Atlantic, its political regime still appeared in the 18th century as a model for the philosophers of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]]. |
Though the economic vitality of the Venetian Republic had started to decline since the 16th century with the movement of international trade towards the Atlantic, its political regime still appeared in the 18th century as a model for the philosophers of the [[Age of Enlightenment|Enlightenment]]. |
||
<gallery> |
|||
File:Zadar PortaTerraferma.jpg|Relief of the Venetian Lion on the Landward Gate in [[Zadar]], capital of [[Venetian Dalmatia]] |
|||
File:Poreč005.jpg|Relief of the Venetian Lion in [[Poreč]] |
|||
File:PA130122.JPG|Relief of the Venetian Lion in [[Kotor]] |
|||
File:Piazza dei Signori (Vicenza) - Statue of the Lion of Saint Mark.jpg|[[Vicenza]], [[Piazza dei Signori, Vicenza|Piazza dei Signori]]. |
|||
File:Udine-colonna del Leone marciano di piazza Libertà.jpg|[[Udine]], [[Piazza Libertà]]. |
|||
File:Fotothek-df ge 0000212-Verona.jpg|[[Piazza delle Erbe, Verona]] |
|||
File:Methoni - Markuslöwe auf der äußeren Burgmauer.jpg|Relief of the Venetian Lion on the walls of [[Methoni, Messenia|Methoni]] |
|||
File:Venitian_Fortress_of_Koules_-_Lion.jpg|Relief of the Venetian Lion in Candia [[Heraklion]] |
|||
File:Frangokastello Kastell - Eingangstor Löwe.jpg|Relief of the Venetian Lion in [[Frangokastello]], [[Crete]] |
|||
File:Venetian blazon in Corfu.jpg|Venetian [[blazon]] with the [[Lion of Saint Mark]], as frequently found on the [[New Fortress]] walls, [[Corfu]]. |
|||
</gallery> |
|||
[[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] was hired in July 1743 as secretary by Comte de Montaigu, who had been named ambassador of the French in Venice. This short experience, nevertheless, awakened the interest of Rousseau to the policy, which led him to design a large book of political philosophy.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Raymond Trousson|first = Raymond|last = Trousson|title=Jean-Jacques Rousseau|publisher= Tallandier|page= 452|date = 2012|isbn = 9782847348743}}</ref> After the ''[[Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men]]'' (1755), he published ''[[The Social Contract]]'' (1762). |
[[Jean-Jacques Rousseau]] was hired in July 1743 as secretary by Comte de Montaigu, who had been named ambassador of the French in Venice. This short experience, nevertheless, awakened the interest of Rousseau to the policy, which led him to design a large book of political philosophy.<ref>{{cite book|author-link=Raymond Trousson|first = Raymond|last = Trousson|title=Jean-Jacques Rousseau|publisher= Tallandier|page= 452|date = 2012|isbn = 9782847348743}}</ref> After the ''[[Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men]]'' (1755), he published ''[[The Social Contract]]'' (1762). |
||
Line 238: | Line 225: | ||
==Politics== |
==Politics== |
||
[[File:Venice-government updated.png|thumb|upright=1.15|right|The governmental structure of the Venetian Republic]] |
[[File:Venice-government updated.png|thumb|upright=1.15|right|The governmental structure of the Venetian Republic]] |
||
Following the Lombard occupation and the progressive migration of the Roman populations, new coastal settlements were born in which the local assemblies, the ''[[Comitium|comitia]]'', elected a [[Tribune]] to govern the local administration, perpetuating the Roman custom started in the last years of the [[Western Roman Empire]]. Between the end of the 7th century and the beginning of the 8th, a new political reform affected [[Maritime Venice|Venetia]]: like the other Byzantine provinces of Italy it was transformed into a [[duchy]], at the head of which was the [[Doge of Venice|doge]]. Following the brief regime of the ''[[Magister militum|magistri militum]]'', in 742 ducal electivity was transferred from the [[Byzantine Empire|Empire]] to local assemblies, thus sanctioning the beginning of the ducal monarchy which lasted, with ups and downs, until the 11th century.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=322–326}} |
|||
{{republicanism sidebar}} |
|||
In the early years of the republic, the [[Doge of Venice]] ruled Venice in an [[autocracy|autocratic fashion]], but later his powers were limited by the ''[[promissione ducale]]'', a pledge he had to take when elected. As a result, powers were shared with the ''Maggior Consiglio'' or [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]], composed of 480 members taken from patrician families, so that in the words of [[Marino Sanuto the Younger|Marin Sanudo]], "[The doge] could do nothing without the Great Council and the Great Council could do nothing without him". |
|||
If the first stable form of involvement of the [[Venetian nobility|patriciate]] in the management of power occurred with the institution of the ''[[Diocesan chancery|curia]] [[Duke|ducis]]'', starting from 1141 with the beginning of the [[Medieval commune|municipal age]], an unstoppable process of limitation and removal of ducal power from part of the nascent mercantile aristocracy gathered in the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]], the largest assembly of the [[Commune of Venice|Veneciarum municipality]]. In the 13th century the popular assembly of the ''[[concio]]'' was progressively stripped of all its powers and, similarly to the Italian [[Signoria|city lordships]], in Venice too power began to concentrate in the hands of a small number of families.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=15–16}} To avoid the birth of a lordship and dilute the power of the old houses, the [[Serrata del Maggior Consiglio|Lockout of the Great Council]] took place in 1297, a measure that increased the number of members of the Great Council leaving the number of families unchanged and therefore precluding the entry of the new nobility.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=142–144}} |
|||
Venice followed a [[mixed government]] model, combining monarchy in the doge, aristocracy in the [[Venetian Senate|Senate]], republic of Rialto families in the Great Council, and a democracy in the [[Concio]].<ref>''The Political Ideas of St. [[Thomas Aquinas]]'', Dino Bigongiari ed., Hafner Publishing Company, NY, 1953. p. ''xxx'' in footnote.</ref> [[Niccolò Machiavelli|Machiavelli]] considered it <nowiki>''excellent among modern republics''</nowiki>, unlike his native [[republic of Florence]].<ref>[[Niccolò Machiavelli]], ''[[The Prince]]'', trans. & ed. by [[Robert M. Adams (literary scholar)|Robert M. Adams]], New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1992. [http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch11s1.html Machiavelli Balanced Government] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210304052329/http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch11s1.html |date=4 March 2021 }}</ref><ref>[[Niccolò Machiavelli]], ''[[Discourses on Livy]]'', trans. by [[Harvey C. Mansfield]] and Nathan Tarcov, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996.</ref> |
|||
Between the 13th and 14th centuries the power of the doge became purely formal and that of the popular assemblies null and void, even if the tannery was formally abolished only in 1423; this decreed the birth of an oligarchic and aristocratic republic which continued to exist until the fall of the Republic.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=326–327}} The organization of the state was entrusted to many nobles divided into numerous assemblies which generally remained in office for less than a year and met in Venice in the [[Doge's Palace]], the political center of the Republic. |
|||
In the 12th century, the aristocratic families of Rialto further diminished the doge's powers by establishing the [[Minor Council]] (1175), composed of the six ducal councillors, and the [[Council of Forty]] or ''Quarantia'' (1179) as a supreme tribunal. In 1223, these institutions were combined into the ''[[Signoria of Venice|Signoria]]'', which consisted of the doge, the Minor Council, and the three leaders of the ''Quarantia''. The Signoria was the central body of government, representing the continuity of the republic as shown in the expression: "si è morto il Doge, no la Signoria" ("If the Doge is dead, the Signoria is not"). |
|||
===Government system=== |
|||
During the late 14th and early 15th centuries, the Signoria was supplemented by boards of ''savii'' ("wise men"): the six ''[[Savi del Consiglio]]'', who formulated and executed government policy; the five ''[[Savi di Terraferma]]'', responsible for military affairs and the defence of the [[Domini di Terraferma|Terraferma]]; and the five ''[[Savi agli Ordini|Savii agli Ordini]]'', responsible for the navy, commerce, and the [[Stato da Màr|overseas territories]]. Together, the Signoria and the Savii formed the [[Full College]] (''Pien Collegio''), the ''de facto'' [[executive body]] of the republic. In 1229, the ''[[Consiglio dei Pregadi]]'' or Senate, was formed, being 60 members elected by the major council.<ref name="CE">''[[Catholic Encyclopedia]]'', "[http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15333a.htm Venice] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181023120316/http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15333a.htm |date=23 October 2018 }}", p. 602.</ref> These developments left the doge with little personal power and put actual authority in the hands of the Great Council. |
|||
====Doge==== |
|||
{{Main|Doge of Venice|Signoria of Venice|Minor Council}} |
|||
[[File:Francesco Guardi 034.jpg|thumb|''The hearing given by the Doge in the Sala del Collegio in Doge's Palace'' by [[Francesco Guardi]], 1775–80]] |
|||
{{multiple image |
|||
In 1310, a [[Council of Ten]] was established, becoming the central political body whose members operated in secret. Around 1600, its dominance over the major council was considered a threat, and efforts were made in the council and elsewhere to reduce its powers, with limited success. |
|||
| caption_align = center |
|||
| footer = |
|||
| image1 = Giovanni Bellini, portrait of Doge Leonardo Loredan.jpg |
|||
| alt1 = |
|||
| caption1 = Doge [[Leonardo Loredan]] as painted by [[Giovanni Bellini]] |
|||
| total_width = 350 |
|||
| image2 = Ritratto del Doge Andrea Gritti - Tiziano 059.jpg |
|||
| alt2 = |
|||
| caption2 = Doge [[Andrea Gritti]] as painted by [[Titian]] |
|||
}} |
|||
The [[Doge of Venice|Doge]] (from the Latin ''dux'', or commander) was the [[head of state]] of the Republic of Venice, the position lasted for life and his name appeared on coins, ducal bulls, judicial sentences and letters sent to foreign governments. His greatest power was to promulgate laws; he also commanded the army during periods of war and had the Sopragastaldo execute all judicial sentences in his name.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|p=102}} The election of the Doge was decreed by an assembly of forty-one electors chosen after a long series of elections and lots, to avoid [[Electoral fraud|fraud]], and once elected the Doge had the obligation to pronounce the ''[[promissione ducale]]'', an oath in which was promised loyalty to the Republic and the limitations to its powers were recognized.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=327–330}}{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=16–17}} |
|||
In 1454, the Supreme Tribunal of the three state inquisitors was established to guard the security of the republic. By means of espionage, [[counterespionage]], internal [[surveillance]], and a network of informers, they ensured that Venice did not come under the rule of a single "signore", as many other Italian cities did at the time. One of the inquisitors—popularly known as ''Il Rosso'' ("the red one") because of his scarlet robe—was chosen from the doge's councillors, two—popularly known as ''I negri'' ("the black ones") because of their black robes—were chosen from the Council of Ten. The Supreme Tribunal gradually assumed some of the powers of the Council of Ten.<ref name = "CE"/> |
|||
The [[Signoria of Venice|Signoria]] was the most dignified assembly of the Venetian governmental system and was composed of the Doge, the [[Minor Council]] and the three leaders of the [[Council of Forty|Quarantia Criminale]]. The Signoria had the fundamental task of presiding over the major assemblies of the state: the College of the Wise, the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]], the [[Venetian Senate|Senate]] and the [[Council of Ten]]. The members of the Signoria also had the power to propose and vote on laws in the presided over assemblies and to convene the Great Council at any time. The Minor Council was elected by the Major Council and was made up of six councilors elected three at a time every eight months; since they remained in office for one year, the three outgoing councilors played the role of Inferior Councilors for four months and presided over the Quarantia Criminale representing the Signoria. Within the Minor Council one of the Three State Inquisitors was elected and following the death of the Doge it elected a Deputy Doge and presided over the Republic with the rest of the Signoria.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=330–331}}{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|p=21}} |
|||
In 1556, the ''provveditori ai beni inculti'' were also created for the improvement of agriculture by increasing the area under cultivation and encouraging private investment in agricultural improvement. The consistent rise in the price of grain during the 16th century encouraged the transfer of capital from trade to the land. |
|||
Over the centuries, 120 doges followed one another in Venice. Among the most illustrious names are: |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
*[[Paolo Lucio Anafesto]], the first Doge of Venice. |
|||
*[[Pietro II Orseolo]], who established Venetian dominion over the [[Adriatic Sea|Adriatic]] and conquered [[Venetian Dalmatia|Dalmatia]]. |
|||
*[[Enrico Dandolo]], who led the Republic of Venice to domination over the [[Byzantine Empire]], giving rise to Venice's maritime empire. |
|||
*[[Marino Faliero]], who was beheaded for attempting to found a [[Signoria|Lordship]]. |
|||
*[[Francesco Foscari]], who expanded the dominions of the Republic into the mainland. |
|||
*[[Leonardo Loredan]], who led Venice in resistance against the [[League of Cambrai]], the coalition of the most important European states against Venice. |
|||
*[[Francesco Morosini]], who led Venice in the recovery of [[Kingdom of the Morea|Morea]] (the [[Peloponnese]]), the last great redemption of the Republic against the [[Ottoman Empire|Turks]]. |
|||
*[[Ludovico Manin]], the last Doge of Venice. |
|||
====College of the Sages==== |
|||
[[File:Pietro Malombra Audience of the Spanish ambassador in Venice.jpg|thumb|right|The [[Full College]] meeting during a visit from the Spanish ambassador]] |
|||
The College of the Sages was composed of three subcommissions called "hands": the [[Savi del Consiglio|Sages of the Council]], the Sages of the Mainland and the Sages of the Orders, it constituted the summit of the [[Executive (government)|executive power]], was elected by the Senate and when it was presided over by the [[Signoria of Venice|Signoria]] it took the name of [[Full College]]. There were six Sages of the Council and they established the agenda of the work of the Senate while the Sages of the Orders, initially responsible for the management of the mude and the navy, progressively lost importance. The Sages of the Mainland were five, one was the Sage of the Ceremonials, one the Sage who dealt with the dispatch of the laws, while the other three were proper ministers: |
|||
*The Sage of the Finances, analogous to the finance minister, was superior and close collaborator of the ''[[Camerlenghi di Comun|camerlenghi]]'';{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|p=117}} |
|||
*The Sage of the Scripture, analogous to the minister of war, was in charge of the economic management of the troops and military justice;{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|p=213}} |
|||
*The Sage of the Ordinances, was responsible for the management of the [[Cernida]], the local defense militias.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|p=213}} |
|||
The Full College had as its primary function that of maintaining relations with foreign states and with the [[Catholic Church|Church]], it welcomed ambassadors, nuncios of subject cities and members of the clergy.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=22–23}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=331–333}} |
|||
====Great Council==== |
|||
{{Main|Great Council of Venice}} |
|||
[[File:Antonio Diziani - The Sala del Maggior Consiglio, Doge's Palace - WGA06352.jpg|thumb|right|An assembly of the [[Great Council of Venice|Great Council]]]] |
|||
The Great Council was made up of all noble men of at least twenty-five years of age registered in the ''[[Libro d'Oro]]'' and held legislative and elective power. Initially made up of around four hundred members, its size increased considerably following the [[Serrata del Maggior Consiglio|Lockout of the Great Council]], so much so that in the 16th century 2,095 nobles participated in a session and in 1527 those entitled to sit reached 2,746.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=142–144}} Each member of the Great Council was allowed to vote and propose a new law which then had to be approved by the Council itself, which was also responsible for reforming and repealing the laws. While the legislative power was mostly held by the Senate, the elective power was almost exclusive to the Great Council. The council elected eighty-four magistracies including: the [[Minor Council]], the Senate, the Council of Forty, the Council of Ten, the [[Grand chancellor (Republic of Venice)|grand chancellor]] and the [[Avogadoria de Comùn]] as well as all the [[Capitano del popolo|captains]], the [[podestà]], the ''[[provveditori]]'', the [[Camerlenghi di Comun|camerlenghi]] and indirectly the Doge.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=30–32}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=333–334}} |
|||
====Principal magistrates==== |
|||
;[[Venetian Senate|Senate]] |
|||
:Also known as the Council of ''Pregadi'', the Senate primarily held legislative power. Made up of around 300 members over thirty-five years of age, 120 were senators elected by the Great Council (60 plus 60 ''de [[Zonta (Republic of Venice)|zonta]]'') to which were added the Council of Ten, the Council of Forty, the College of the Sages and many other magistracies which often held exclusive power to vote or propose laws. The Senate was responsible for legislating mainly on financial, commercial and foreign policies.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=34–38}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=334–335}} |
|||
;[[Council of Forty]] |
|||
:The Council of Forty was the body that held maximum judicial power. It was divided into: Quarantia Criminale for criminal trials, Quarantia Civil Vecchia and Quarantia Civil Nuova for civil trials in the ''Dogado'' and the Mainland Dominions and into two panels of fifteen and twenty-five members for cases of minor importance. Each of the Quarantie was made up of forty members which, added to those of the colleges, made 160 members. The judges rotated starting from the colleges and then arriving at the Quarantia Criminale and worked for eight months in each assembly, remaining in office for two years and eight months.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=63–64}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=336–337}} |
|||
;[[Avogadoria de Comùn]] |
|||
:Similar to today's [[Public prosecutor's office|public prosecutor]], the Avogadoria de Comùn represented the interests of the community and the state. The advocates remained in office for sixteen months and were also responsible for drawing up the ''Libro d'Oro'' in which all those entitled to sit on the Great Council were registered.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=68–69}} |
|||
;[[Council of Ten]] |
|||
:A special state security agency created following the Tiepolo conspiracy, it was made up of ten members who had the aim of guaranteeing the security of the Republic and its government through any means. The Council acted as a court with jurisdiction over state security matters; its power was so broad that in 1355 it even condemned the Doge [[Marino Faliero]] to death. Having such broad power, the position lasted only one year and furthermore the ten could not exercise other public functions and had no family ties between them. To guarantee the secrecy of its actions, the Council was entrusted with a sum of money which it administered independently. The Three State Inquisitors, who could replace ordinary judges and proceeded in secret, had greater power within the body.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1937|pp=52–61}} |
|||
===Administrative subdivisions=== |
|||
[[File:VenetianRepublic 1790 VEC 75dpi.png|thumb|right|The Venetian Republic between 1718 and 1797 with its administrative subdivisions]] |
|||
The fundamental administrative subdivision of the Republic of Venice was the regiment, a small territory administered by a podestà, to which a city was headed. The regiments were born only in the first half of the 15th century via the mechanism of dedications. The Republic required the deposition of the lord who was promptly replaced with a rector, after which the city's ambassadors went to Venice where the city's indissoluble bond with the Republic was defined. Because of this mechanism, the Republic of Venice managed to incorporate many territories.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.storiadivenezia.net/sito/saggi/berengo_ravenna.pdf |title=Ravenna in età Veneziana |language=Italian |first=Marino |last=Berengo |pages=1–2 |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304201836/http://www.storiadivenezia.net/sito/saggi/berengo_ravenna.pdf |archive-date=4 March 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
|||
To govern the most important regiments in an impartial and effective way, the podestà was chosen from among the members of the Venetian patriciate, while in secondary regiments the rector was often chosen from among the local nobility.{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=300}} Despite this, the laws and administration varied greatly based on the peculiarities of the regiment itself. The Republic therefore left a lot of freedom of government to the podestà, though at the end of their mandate, after a maximum of four years, the podestà was obliged to deliver a report on their administration.{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=343}} |
|||
The podestà, who depending on the territory administered was also called rector, [[bailo]], count or governor, in larger regiments was also assisted by two councilors and other administrators. The army and police were under the command of the Captain{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=89}} while the borders were supervised by the Castellani, the Chancellors administered justice{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=87}} while finance was managed by the Camerlenghi.{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=78}} The superintendent generals acted above the podestàs and, in addition to having the power to choose the rectors in case of danger, were normally involved in supervising the podestàs by sending supervisors called sindi inquisitors.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|pp=3–4}} |
|||
The regiments ultimately formed three administrative regions: |
|||
;''[[Dogado]]'' |
|||
:The ''Dogado'' was the original territory of the Republic. It included Venice and its lagoon which was divided into nine districts. Each district was governed by a patrician with the title of podestà and the district cities were: [[Caorle]], [[Torcello]], [[Murano]], [[Malamocco]], [[Chioggia]], [[Loreo, Veneto|Loreo]], [[Cavarzere]] and Gambarare, while the city of [[Grado, Friuli Venezia Giulia|Grado]] was administered by a count.{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|pp=196–197}} Initially extending along the entire Venetian coast from Grado to Cavarzere, it progressively moved its southern border up to [[Goro, Emilia–Romagna|Goro]], along the [[Po (river)#Po Delta|Po Delta]]; the extension on the mainland was limited to between 7 and 19 kilometers.{{sfn|Mutinelli|1851|p=127}} |
|||
;''[[Stato da Màr]]'' |
|||
:The ''Domini del Mare'', called ''Stato da Mar'' in the Venetian language, were made up of the overseas territories conquered by the Republic of Venice. The regiments of the ''Stato da Mar'' reported to the ''[[Provveditore Generale da Mar]]'' who lived on the island of [[Corfu]]. During their expansion, the Venetians established a series of dominions throughout the Eastern Mediterranean that went from [[Istria]] to [[Dalmatia]], also including [[Venetian Albania|Albania]] and the [[Ionian Islands]]. Further east, the Republic conquered a large part of Greece, in particular the [[Cyclades]], the [[Peloponnese]] and [[Euboea|Negroponte]], as well as the large islands of [[Crete]] and [[Cyprus]].{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|p=5}} In addition to the territories directly dominated by Venice, the ''Stato da Mar'' also included various feudal lordships governed by the major noble families of the time. These lordships corresponded to the various [[Aegean Islands]], but were also established in [[Athens]] and [[Gelibolu|Gallipoli]].{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|pp=21–22}} |
|||
;''[[Domini di Terraferma|Stato da Tera]]'' |
|||
:The ''Domini di Terraferma'', called ''Stato da Tera'' in the Venetian language, were made up of the territories of northern Italy conquered by the Republic of Venice, where in the event of war the command of the armies was assumed by the Superintendent General of Arms. The mainland possessions were the territories of [[Province of Padua|Padovano]], [[Province of Treviso|Marca]], [[Province of Vicenza|Vicenza]], [[Province of Verona|Veronese]], [[Province of Brescia|Bresciano]], [[Province of Bergamo|Bergamasco]], [[Province of Cremona|Cremonese]], [[Friuli]], [[Polesine]] and [[Cadore]].{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|p=6}} |
|||
===Armed forces and public security=== |
===Armed forces and public security=== |
||
====Navy==== |
|||
{{main|Venetian navy}} |
{{main|Venetian navy}} |
||
{{further|Military history of the Republic of Venice}} |
|||
{{see also|List of sailing ships of the Venetian Navy|Hemp in the Republic of Venice}} |
|||
[[File:Venice galley rowing alla sensile1.jpg|thumb|Model of a Venetian galley, [[Museo Storico Navale]], Venice, Italy]] |
|||
[[File:Canaletto (II) 002.jpg|thumb|''The Return of the [[Bucentaur]] to the Molo on Ascension Day'', 1730, by [[Canaletto]]]] |
|||
[[File:C croisade4 flotte.jpg|thumb|Venetian navy landing in Constantinople during the [[Fourth Crusade]], from a XV Century miniature]] |
|||
During the Medieval period, the republic's military was composed of the following elements: |
|||
#''Forza ordinaria'' (ordinary force), the oarsmen drafted from the citizens of the city of Venice; everyone from the age of 20–70 was obligated to serve in it. However, generally only a twelfth was active. |
|||
#''Forza sussidiaria'' (subsidiary force), the military force drawn from Venice's overseas possessions. |
|||
#''Forza straordinaria'' (extraordinary force), the mercenary part of the army; Venetian galleys tended to employ thirty mercenary crossbowmen. With the rise of [[scutage]], it became the dominant element of the Venetian military.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Heath |first1=Ian |title=Armies of Feudal Europe 1066–1300 |date=2016 |isbn=9781326256524 |pages=62–65 |publisher=Lulu.com |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=L3VKDAAAQBAJ |language=en |access-date=28 September 2020 |archive-date=25 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201025035246/https://books.google.com/books?id=L3VKDAAAQBAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> |
|||
[[File:Atlante Veneto Volume 1 179 (cropped).jpg|thumb|right|Depiction of Venetian [[Galleass]]es in the [[Atlante Veneto]], 1691]] |
|||
In the [[early modern period]], the Republic's military strength was well out of proportion with its demographic weight. In the late 16th century, it ruled over a population of about 2 million people throughout its empire. In 1571, while preparing for war against the Ottomans, the republic had 37,000 soldiers and 140 galleys (manned by tens of thousands of sailors and oarsmen), excluding urban militias. The Venetian peacetime army strength of 9,000 was able to quadruple in the course of a few months by drawing upon professional hired soldiers and territorial militias simultaneously. These troops generally showed marked technical superiority over their primarily Turkish opponents, as demonstrated in battles such as the 18-month [[siege of Famagusta]], in which the Venetians inflicted outsized casualties and only were defeated when they exhausted their gunpowder. |
|||
The navy was the main armed force of the Republic for centuries, at least until the 15th century when it was also supported by a land army. The fleet was administered by the Magistrate of the Militia of the Sea, a sort of ministry composed of different magistracies that divided the tasks of governing the preparation of the fleet, weapons and crews. The preparation of the fleet was administered by the supervisors of the [[Venetian Arsenal]], the key structure of the Venetian navy. In this extensive complex of workshops and shipyards, ships were built and armed. The Arsenal also contained several schools in which personnel were trained, also with the help of French and English workers, to make the construction of ships and vessels more efficient and of higher quality. The preparation of the fleet was decided by the armament supervisors who took care of the maintenance of the decommissioned ships and the assignment of the soldiers and rowers. The recruitment operations for sailors were instead carried out by the presidents of the Militia of the Sea, who following the [[Cretan War (1645–1669)|War of Candia]] began to recruit personnel from abroad and not only from the territory of the Republic.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=369–371}} |
|||
The fleet located in the ''[[Stato da Màr]]'' was managed by the [[Provveditore Generale da Mar|Superintendent General of the Sea]], who resided in [[Corfu]] and in the overseas dominions was also head of the army and administration. In wartime, command passed to the [[Captain General of the Sea]], who was immediately elected and who had more extensive powers than the Superintendent General.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=371–372}} The fleet was divided into a small army and a large army. The thin army was made up of [[galley]]s and [[galleass]]es and the admirals in command, all patricians, had different degrees of specialisation; for example there were those responsible for navigating rivers and lakes, those dedicated to the war against piracy and those dedicated to surveillance of the islands. The large army, made up of warships, was managed in wartime by the Commissioner in the Army and the command of the ships was assigned to naval officers who did not belong to the Veneto patricians. Until the end of the 16th century the large armada was also used for the defense of commercial ships.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|p=5}} |
|||
====Army==== |
|||
Like other states of the period, the republic's military strength peaked during wars, only to quickly go back to peacetime levels because of costs. The level of garrisons stabilized after 1577 at 9,000, with 7,000 infantry and the rest cavalry. In 1581 there were 146 galleys and 18 galleasses in the navy, requiring a third of the Republic's revenue.{{sfn|Hanlon|1997|pp=19–20, 25, 87}} During the Cretan War (1645-1669), the republic fought mostly alone against the undivided attention of the Ottoman Empire, and though it lost, managed to keep fighting after losing 62,000 troops in the attrition, while inflicting about 240,000 losses on the Ottoman army and sinking hundreds of Ottoman ships. The cost of the war was ruinous, but the republic was eventually able to cover it.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Paoletti |first1=Ciro |title=A Military History of Italy |date=2008 |page=33|publisher = Bloomsbury Academic|isbn = 9780275985059}}</ref> The Morean War further confirmed the republic's position as a military power well into the late 17th century. |
|||
{{main|Venetian army}} |
|||
[[File:Bartolomeo Colleoni by Andrea del Verrocchio.jpg|thumb|right|[[Bartolomeo Colleoni]], Captain General of the Mainland during the [[Wars in Lombardy]]]] |
|||
In the 15th century, the expansion and conquest of the [[Domini di Terraferma|mainland]] made it necessary to resort to venture companies and mercenaries to be able to equip themselves with land forces. The organization of the troops and mercenaries was managed by a set of supervisors who were coordinated by the Inquisitors above the roles, presided over by the Sages of the Mainland, who were responsible for reporting and managing the troops and their equipment. In the 16th century, the Cernide were established, territorial militias managed by the Rector of the regiment and made up of around a hundred men dedicated to the defense of land and maritime possessions, where they took the name of "craine"; they were managed by Savio ai Ordini. In wartime, the armies were coordinated by the Captain General of the Mainland, usually an expert mercenary who was supported by the Superintendent General and who took orders from the Sage of Scripture or the Minister of War.{{sfn|Da Mosto|1940|p=6}}{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=372–373}} |
|||
====Police==== |
|||
Venetian military strength underwent a terminal decline in the 18th century. The combined effect of prolonged peace and the abandonment of military careers by patricians meant that Venetian military culture ossified. Its army in that period was poorly maintained. The troops, serving under non-martial officers, were not regularly drilled and worked various odd jobs to supplement their salaries. Its navy did not decline to as drastic a degree but still was greatly reduced from its relative power in the 16th and 17th centuries. In a normal 18th century year there were about 20 [[Ship of the line|ships of the line]] (each of 64 or 70 cannons), 10 [[Frigate|frigates]], 20 galleys, and 100 small craft, which mostly participated in patrols and punitive expeditions against [[Barbary pirates|Barbary corsairs]]. When Napoleon invaded in 1796, the republic surrendered without a fight.{{sfn|Hanlon|1997|pp=176-177}} |
|||
The order of the city of Venice was managed by a police force coordinated by the six [[Lords of the Night (Venice)|Lords of the Night]] who had the power to arrest criminals both day and night. In addition to the Lords of the Night, the district leaders also patrolled the streets. However, the order was also managed by a various number of supervisors. Crimes such as rape and blasphemy were regulated by the perpetrators of blasphemy who also took care of the control of brothels, the pump supervisors instead controlled the excesses of the nobles while the magistrates controlled health and the healthiness of public places. The new Justice controlled fraud and the Censors controlled corruption among public offices.{{sfn|Romanin|1859|pp=357–360}} For political and more internal matters, the Republic sometimes also resorted to the use of hit men and had a network of spies comparable to modern secret services.{{sfn|Preto|2004|p=344}} |
|||
{{clear}} |
|||
===Symbols=== |
===Symbols=== |
||
Line 287: | Line 331: | ||
==Society== |
==Society== |
||
Starting from the |
Starting from the 13th century, Venetian society clearly distinguished two social classes: |
||
; [[Venetian nobility|Patricians]] |
; [[Venetian nobility|Patricians]] |
||
Line 301: | Line 345: | ||
[[File:Ghetto ebraico di Venezia - Foto di Giovanni Dall'Orto1.jpg|thumb|right|[[Venetian Ghetto]]]] |
[[File:Ghetto ebraico di Venezia - Foto di Giovanni Dall'Orto1.jpg|thumb|right|[[Venetian Ghetto]]]] |
||
[[File:Schola levantina Facciata.jpg|thumb|right|[[Levantine Synagogue]]]] |
[[File:Schola levantina Facciata.jpg|thumb|right|[[Levantine Synagogue]]]] |
||
The earliest evidence of Jewish presence in Venice dates back to 932;<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/le-origini-gli-ebrei-a-venezia |title=Storia |
The earliest evidence of Jewish presence in Venice dates back to 932;<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/le-origini-gli-ebrei-a-venezia |title=Storia – Le origini: Gli ebrei a Venezia |language=Italian |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191129034905/http://www.jvenice.org/it/le-origini-gli-ebrei-a-venezia |archive-date=29 November 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> in the 12th century the community had around a thousand members and was established in [[Mestre]] rather than [[Giudecca]] as was previously believed. Every day the Jews left Mestre and went to Venice, in particular to the [[San Marco]] and [[Rialto]] districts where they were allowed to work; here they trafficked goods and granted money loans, while some carried out the medical profession. Usury work was necessary for the functioning of the city's business activities and therefore, although they did not have citizenship and were not allowed to live there or buy a house, Jews were admitted to the capital with permits that were renewed every five or ten years. With a decree dated 22 May 1298, a limit was placed on the interest rate on loans, which was set between 10% and 12% and at the same time a tax of 5% was imposed on commercial traffic.{{Sfn|Cappelletti|1853|pp=120–123}} |
||
In 1385, a group of Jewish moneylenders were allowed to live in the lagoon for the first time.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-prima-condotta |title=Storia |
In 1385, a group of Jewish moneylenders were allowed to live in the lagoon for the first time.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-prima-condotta |title=Storia – La prima condotta |language=Italian |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191128214328/http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-prima-condotta |archive-date=28 November 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> On 25 September 1386 they requested and obtained the purchase of part of the land of the [[Monastery of San Nicolò al Lido]] to bury their deceased, creating the Jewish cemetery of Venice, which is still functioning today. Towards the end of the 14th century, restrictions on Jews increased and they were only allowed to stay in the city for two weeks; furthermore they were forced to wear a yellow circle as a distinctive sign, which in the 16th century transformed into a red cloth.{{Sfn|Cappelletti|1853|pp=123–132}} |
||
After the [[Battle of Agnadello|defeat of Agnadello]] by the [[League of Cambrai]], many Jews from [[Vicenza]] and [[Conegliano]] took refuge in the lagoon, making coexistence with the Christians difficult. Following social tensions, the [[Venetian Ghetto]] was established on 29 March 1516 where the foundries had previously stood and in 1541 it was expanded to make room for the Levantine Jews.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-nascita-del-ghetto-i-tedeschi |title=Storia |
After the [[Battle of Agnadello|defeat of Agnadello]] by the [[League of Cambrai]], many Jews from [[Vicenza]] and [[Conegliano]] took refuge in the lagoon, making coexistence with the Christians difficult. Following social tensions, the [[Venetian Ghetto]] was established on 29 March 1516 where the foundries had previously stood and in 1541 it was expanded to make room for the Levantine Jews.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-nascita-del-ghetto-i-tedeschi |title=Storia – La nascita del Ghetto – I Tedeschi |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221095256/http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-nascita-del-ghetto-i-tedeschi |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/levantini-e-ponentini |title=Storia – Levantini e Ponentini |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |language=Italian |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221100524/http://www.jvenice.org/it/levantini-e-ponentini |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> The work of the Jews was placed under the supervision of the magistrates in Cattaver, and in addition to managing the ghetto's pawnshops they were allowed to trade in second-hand goods, making the ghetto an important commercial center. The ghetto was divided into communities based on their country of origin, each with its own synagogue.<ref name=NationeItaliana>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-natione-italiana |title=Storia – La Natione italiana |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |language=Italian |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221092928/http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-natione-italiana |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
After the plague the ghetto was repopulated by some Eastern European Jews and in 1633 the ghetto was expanded,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-peste-e-la-ripresa-del-ghetto |title=Storia |
After the plague the ghetto was repopulated by some Eastern European Jews and in 1633 the ghetto was expanded,<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-peste-e-la-ripresa-del-ghetto |title=Storia – La peste e la ripresa del Ghetto |language=Italian |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221223917/http://www.jvenice.org/it/la-peste-e-la-ripresa-del-ghetto |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> but in the meantime Venice had lost its centrality and the Jewish community also began to shrink; taxes towards it increased and sectarian movements began to arise. The situation declined until in 1737 the community declared bankruptcy.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.jvenice.org/it/dalla-crisi-economica-al-messianesimo-di-sabbatai-zevi |title=Storia – Dalla crisi economica al messianesimo di Sabbatai Zevi |language=Italian |website=JVenice |publisher=Jewish Community of Venice |access-date=22 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191221102244/http://www.jvenice.org/it/dalla-crisi-economica-al-messianesimo-di-sabbatai-zevi |archive-date=21 December 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> |
||
===Publishing=== |
===Publishing=== |
||
Printing and other graphic arts constituted a thriving economic sector of the Republic and the main means of disseminating Venetian knowledge and discoveries in the technical, humanistic and scientific fields. The birth of Venetian publishing dates back to the |
Printing and other graphic arts constituted a thriving economic sector of the Republic and the main means of disseminating Venetian knowledge and discoveries in the technical, humanistic and scientific fields. The birth of Venetian publishing dates back to the 15th century, in particular to 18 September 1469 when, through the efforts of the German [[Johann and Wendelin of Speyer|Johann of Speyer]], the Venetian government passed the first law to protect publishers by granting a printing privilege which gave the publisher the exclusive right to print certain works.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/privilegio-di-stampa/ |title=Privilegio di stampa |language=Italian |website=Treccani |publisher=Istituto della Enciclopedia Italianafondata da Giovanni Treccani S.p.A. |access-date=April 3, 2024}}</ref> In addition to the German community, the French community, led by [[Nicolas Jenson]], also owned most of the Venetian printing presses towards the end of the 15th century.{{sfn|Ciriacono|1996}} |
||
Between 1495 and 1515 [[Aldus Manutius]] further developed Venetian publishing via three innovations which later spread throughout Europe: the [[octavo]] format, the [[Italic type|italic]] character and the hooked [[comma]]. These inventions allowed him to become the largest Venetian publisher and consequently attracted the major humanists of the time, including [[Pietro Bembo]] and [[Erasmus]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.mostraaldomanuzio.it/exhibition/manuzio |title=Aldo Manuzio |
Between 1495 and 1515 [[Aldus Manutius]] further developed Venetian publishing via three innovations which later spread throughout Europe: the [[octavo]] format, the [[Italic type|italic]] character and the hooked [[comma]]. These inventions allowed him to become the largest Venetian publisher and consequently attracted the major humanists of the time, including [[Pietro Bembo]] and [[Erasmus]].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.mostraaldomanuzio.it/exhibition/manuzio |title=Aldo Manuzio – Note biografiche |access-date=11 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810233823/http://www.mostraaldomanuzio.it/exhibition/manuzio |archive-date=10 August 2017 |url-status=dead}}</ref> After Manutius, many other Italian entrepreneurs such as the Florentine [[Lucantonio Giunti]] opened printing presses in Venice, which towards the end of the 16th century reached 200 businesses, each with higher book circulations than the average for European cities. The large quantity of printing houses scattered throughout the Venetian territory made the city of Venice a leader in the sector, so much so that in the last twenty years of the 15th century one book in ten in Europe was printed in Venice.{{sfn|Ciriacono|1996}} Book production in Venice was encouraged not only by the rules in favor of publishers, but also by the lack of censorship; in the 16th century works prohibited in the rest of Europe such as the ''Lustful Sonnets'' were printed in Venice.{{sfn|Magno|2012|pp=2–3}} |
||
==Religion== |
==Religion== |
||
===Catholicism=== |
===Catholicism=== |
||
[[File:Venezia bazylika sw Marka 22.jpg|left|thumb|[[St Mark's Basilica]]]] |
[[File:Venezia bazylika sw Marka 22.jpg|left|thumb|[[St Mark's Basilica]]]] |
||
The Republic of Venice recognized Catholicism as the state religion and while remaining relatively tolerant compared to other confessions, there were many laws in favor of Catholic traditions given that according the 1770 census, approximately 86.5% of the population was Catholic.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|p=7}}{{sfn|Castiglioni|1862|p=301}} The Catholic Church administered the territory of the Republic first with the [[Patriarchate of Grado]] which had the [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Castello|Diocese of Castello]] as its suffragen, which was then suppressed on 8 October 1451 by [[Pope Nicholas V]] |
The Republic of Venice recognized Catholicism as the state religion<ref>{{cite book |last=Gordon |first=Scott |title=Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2009 |isbn=9780674037830 |page=149 |quote=Venice was the most cosmopolitan city in Europe in the sixteenth century, but its many churches were almost entirely Christian and Catholic, and Catholicism was the official religion of the republic.}}</ref> and while remaining relatively tolerant compared to other confessions, there were many laws in favor of Catholic traditions given that according the 1770 census, approximately 86.5% of the population was Catholic.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|p=7}}{{sfn|Castiglioni|1862|p=301}} The Catholic Church administered the territory of the Republic first with the [[Patriarchate of Grado]] which had the [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Castello|Diocese of Castello]] as its suffragen, which was then suppressed on 8 October 1451 by [[Pope Nicholas V]] to erect the [[Patriarchate of Venice]] which then also incorporated the dioceses of Jesolo, [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Torcello|Torcello]] and [[Roman Catholic Diocese of Caorle|Caorle]]. During the history of the Republic of Venice, the cathedral of the patriarchate was the [[San Pietro di Castello (church)|Basilica of San Pietro di Castello]] which was changed to [[St Mark's Basilica|St Mark]] only in 1807, ten years after the fall of the Republic.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.patriarcatovenezia.it/patriarcato/storia-del-patriarcato/ |title=Storia del Patriarcato – Patriarcato di Venezia |language=Italian |publisher=Patriarcato de Venezia |access-date=7 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190209131105/http://www.patriarcatovenezia.it/patriarcato/storia-del-patriarcato/ |archive-date=9 February 2019 |url-status=dead}}</ref> During the period of the [[Counter-Reformation]], the [[Inquisition]] was also active in the Republic of Venice, which from 1542 to 1794 tried 3,620 defendants including [[Giordano Bruno]], [[Pier Paolo Vergerio]] and [[Marco Antonio de Dominis]]. Crimes relating to faith, such as witchcraft, were regulated by a secular court as early as 1181 during the regency of Doge [[Orio Mastropiero]]. The tribunal, in addition to being made up of its judges appointed by the doge, also availed itself of the help of the bishops and the patriarch of Grado and the most widespread punishment for those convicted was that of being burned at the stake.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=14–16}} These magistrates continued to intervene as lay members even in the trials of the Inquisition, often coming into conflict with the Church and sometimes mitigating the harshness of the punishment.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|p=279}} Furthermore, the Inquisition only had power over Christians and not over members of other confessions such as Jews.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|p=34}} The government also regulated the construction of places of worship, limited bequests to the Church, favored by the presence of parish priests-notaries, and controlled priests who preached against the government, sometimes expelling them from the state.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=85–90}} |
||
===Other religions=== |
===Other religions=== |
||
Line 323: | Line 367: | ||
In addition to the Catholic faith in the Republic of Venice, particularly in the Stato da Mar, the Orthodox church was also present; according to the 1770 census, the Orthodox Greeks constituted approximately 13.3% of the population.{{sfn|Castiglioni|1862|p=301}} The [[Greek community in Venice|Greek Orthodox community]] was also present in the capital and in 1456 the Greeks obtained permission to build the church of [[San Biagio, Venice|San Biagio in Venice]], the only church in the city where they could celebrate their rites. In 1514, due to overcrowding of San Biagio, the construction of the church of [[San Giorgio dei Greci]] was permitted.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=459–461}} |
In addition to the Catholic faith in the Republic of Venice, particularly in the Stato da Mar, the Orthodox church was also present; according to the 1770 census, the Orthodox Greeks constituted approximately 13.3% of the population.{{sfn|Castiglioni|1862|p=301}} The [[Greek community in Venice|Greek Orthodox community]] was also present in the capital and in 1456 the Greeks obtained permission to build the church of [[San Biagio, Venice|San Biagio in Venice]], the only church in the city where they could celebrate their rites. In 1514, due to overcrowding of San Biagio, the construction of the church of [[San Giorgio dei Greci]] was permitted.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=459–461}} |
||
The remaining population belonged to other churches such as the Protestant and the Armenian Catholic churches and there were also Islamic merchants, who however did not reside permanently in Venice. The Armenians settled in Venice as early as the mid- |
The remaining population belonged to other churches such as the Protestant and the Armenian Catholic churches and there were also Islamic merchants, who however did not reside permanently in Venice. The Armenians settled in Venice as early as the mid-13th century, although the construction of the first Armenian Catholic church, the church of [[Santa Croce degli Armeni]], dates back only to 1682.{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=489–493}} [[San Lazzaro degli Armeni]] also served as the Armenians' main cultural center. |
||
The Protestant religion, which could be practiced freely, also spread in the Republic of Venice through commercial relations maintained with the Germans and the Swiss. In 1649 the Protestants obtained the possibility of burying their dead in the [[San Bartolomeo, Venice|Church of San Bartolomeo]] and in 1657 they were allowed to celebrate masses with German shepherds in the [[Fondaco dei Tedeschi]].{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=474–475}} |
The Protestant religion, which could be practiced freely, also spread in the Republic of Venice through commercial relations maintained with the Germans and the Swiss. In 1649 the Protestants obtained the possibility of burying their dead in the [[San Bartolomeo, Venice|Church of San Bartolomeo]] and in 1657 they were allowed to celebrate masses with German shepherds in the [[Fondaco dei Tedeschi]].{{sfn|Cecchetti|1874|pp=474–475}} |
||
Line 334: | Line 378: | ||
{{Main|Economic history of Venice}} |
{{Main|Economic history of Venice}} |
||
===Resources=== |
===Resources=== |
||
Since the first settlements, fishing played a fundamental role in the livelihood of the lagoon communities. Fishing was one of the most widespread activities among the common people who also dedicated themselves to [[fish farming]]. After being caught, the fish was salted |
Since the first settlements, fishing played a fundamental role in the livelihood of the lagoon communities. Fishing was one of the most widespread activities among the common people who also dedicated themselves to [[fish farming]]. After being caught, the fish was salted to improve preservation.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=60}} In addition to fishing, although to a lesser extent, hunting, fowling and pastoralism were widespread but were limited by the scarcity of pastures in the ''[[Dogado]]''. Since pastures in the lagoon were limited, agriculture was instead widespread mainly with vegetable crops and some vineyards, the agricultural products of which were sold by fruit merchants.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=74–75}} |
||
In addition to fishing, lagoon populations heavily relied on salt extraction for their livelihood. Owing to the salt trade, the first lagoon populations were able to purchase goods that the Venetian lagoon did not produce, primarily wheat. A direct competitor in the production of salt was [[Comacchio]], which was destroyed in 932 and its population transferred to the Venetian lagoon. The areas of greatest production were the northern part of the lagoon and the district of [[Chioggia]] which over the centuries became the greatest salt producer in the Mediterranean, reaching its peak in the 13th century. Most of the salt produced in Chioggia was exported to Italy via the [[Po (river)|Po]] and the [[Adige]]. The salt pans were made up of a series of dams, basins and canals that allowed them to function correctly. Their extension was notable; the Chioggia salt pans occupied an area of approximately 30 km² which corresponded to ninety times the size of the city. The impetus for the foundations' construction was given by the Doge and the great ducal families who held the property. The estates of the nobles were rented to the families of the salt workers who independently maintained the salt pan and extracted the salt. The owners of the land had an exclusively economic relationship with the salt workers; consequently the nobles, owners of the land, could not consider themselves feudal lords as was the case in the rest of Europe in the cultivation of wheat. The salt workers also organized consortia which made noble imposition of the landowners even more difficult.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/eta-ducale-le-risorse-le-saline_%28Storia-di-Venezia%29/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180919211615/http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/eta-ducale-le-risorse-le-saline_%28Storia-di-Venezia%29/ |title=Eta Ducale |
In addition to fishing, lagoon populations heavily relied on salt extraction for their livelihood. Owing to the salt trade, the first lagoon populations were able to purchase goods that the Venetian lagoon did not produce, primarily wheat. A direct competitor in the production of salt was [[Comacchio]], which was destroyed in 932 and its population transferred to the Venetian lagoon. The areas of greatest production were the northern part of the lagoon and the district of [[Chioggia]] which over the centuries became the greatest salt producer in the Mediterranean, reaching its peak in the 13th century. Most of the salt produced in Chioggia was exported to Italy via the [[Po (river)|Po]] and the [[Adige]]. The salt pans were made up of a series of dams, basins and canals that allowed them to function correctly. Their extension was notable; the Chioggia salt pans occupied an area of approximately 30 km² which corresponded to ninety times the size of the city. The impetus for the foundations' construction was given by the Doge and the great ducal families who held the property. The estates of the nobles were rented to the families of the salt workers who independently maintained the salt pan and extracted the salt. The owners of the land had an exclusively economic relationship with the salt workers; consequently the nobles, owners of the land, could not consider themselves feudal lords as was the case in the rest of Europe in the cultivation of wheat. The salt workers also organized consortia which made noble imposition of the landowners even more difficult.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/eta-ducale-le-risorse-le-saline_%28Storia-di-Venezia%29/ |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180919211615/http://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/eta-ducale-le-risorse-le-saline_%28Storia-di-Venezia%29/ |title=Eta Ducale – Le risorse: le saline |last=Hocquet |first=Jean-Claude |website=Treccani |year=1992 |archive-date=September 19, 2018 |access-date=June 26, 2020 |url-status=dead}}</ref> In the 14th century, during the height of commercial expansion, salt production in the lagoon had decreased. Regardless, Venice maintained a monopoly on this precious commodity by requiring merchants to transport a certain percentage of salt which was often purchased in Puglia, Sicily, Sardinia, the Balearic Islands, Cyprus and on the coast of Libya.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=160–161}} |
||
===Industry=== |
===Industry=== |
||
[[Venetian glass]], traded as early as the 9th century in the form of sheets, is still considered one of the leading products of the Venetian industry. Because of its quality, Venetian glass was used to make works of art exported all over the world.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}}{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=282}} Its production was located solely on the island of Murano |
[[Venetian glass]], traded as early as the 9th century in the form of sheets, is still considered one of the leading products of the Venetian industry. Because of its quality, Venetian glass was used to make works of art exported all over the world.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}}{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=282}} Its production was located solely on the island of Murano to avoid the spread of fires within the capital.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=121}} Despite the glass production, the most successful activity was that of shipbuilding which took place within the [[Venetian Arsenal|state arsenal]], active since the 12th century,<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.comune.venezia.it/it/content/cronologia-storica|title=Storia dell'Arsenale |publisher=Città di Venezia |date=19 March 2020 |access-date=19 March 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200614223028/https://www.comune.venezia.it/it/content/cronologia-storica |archive-date=14 June 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> but also in the small Venetian shipyards of the city. Alongside the construction of ships, the production of naval cordage was developed by the ''filacànevi'', who starting from the 13th century imported hemp from Russia via the Black Sea.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=122}} Among the activities already widespread in the 13th century were tanneries and wool spinning, which were exercised in Giudecca.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=121}} |
||
===Trade=== |
===Trade=== |
||
[[File:Repubblica di Venezia.png|thumb|left|A map of Venice's trade routes and possessions at the beginning of the 16th century]] |
[[File:Repubblica di Venezia.png|thumb|left|A map of Venice's trade routes and possessions at the beginning of the 16th century]] |
||
[[File:Palamidi fortress (Nafplio, Greece).jpg|thumb|left|The Venetian fort of [[Palamidi]] in [[Nafplion]], [[Greece]], one of many forts that secured Venetian [[trade route]]s in the Eastern [[Mediterranean]]]] |
|||
From its early history, trade was the basis of the Republic of Venice's success and political rise: in 829, the Doge [[Giustiniano Participazio]] was involved not only in the management of his feudal assets but also in commercial affairs by sea.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}} The commercial enterprises of Venetian citizens increased in the [[12th century]], a period which saw the creation of the [[Muda (convoy)|mude]], caravans of merchant [[galley]]s which, escorted by armed ships, headed towards the eastern markets, starting with that of [[Constantinople]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=91–93}} Venice had a privileged relationship with the [[Byzantine Empire]] starting from 1082 when, with the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|issuing of the Golden Bull]], Venetian merchants were allowed to exchange goods with the Byzantines without any tax and to establish an inhabited nucleus directly in the capital, a privilege which however ended violently in 1171 by the decree of [[Manuel I Komnenos]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=66}} Commercial traffic reached its peak in the [[13th century]], but continued to be fundamental in the political and social life of Venice until the end of the [[16th century]]. This period saw the establishment of state-sanctioned mude, convoys of ships contracted to merchants which were used to reach faraway lands including India, China, England and Flanders. The Republic's trade was so extensive that in 1325 the existence of Venetian settlements was noted in northern European cities including [[Southampton]] and [[Bruges]] and in Asian cities such as [[Quanzhou|Zaiton]], [[Sudak]], [[Azov]], [[Trabzon]], and [[Amman]] as well as other settlements on the shores of the [[Aral Sea]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=158–163}} Venetian trade suffered a sharp decline at the end of the 16th century when competition from the Portuguese, Spanish, English and Dutch became suffocating for Venetian merchants.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=366–367}} |
|||
From its early history, trade was the basis of the Republic of Venice's success and political rise: in 829, the Doge [[Giustiniano Participazio]] was involved not only in the management of his feudal assets but also in commercial affairs by sea.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}} The commercial enterprises of Venetian citizens increased in the 12th century, a period which saw the creation of the [[Muda (convoy)|mude]], caravans of merchant [[galley]]s which, escorted by armed ships, headed towards the eastern markets, starting with that of [[Constantinople]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=91–93}} Venice had a privileged relationship with the [[Byzantine Empire]] starting from 1082 when, with the [[Byzantine–Venetian treaty of 1082|issuing of the Golden Bull]], Venetian merchants were allowed to exchange goods with the Byzantines without any tax and to establish an inhabited nucleus directly in the capital, a privilege which however ended violently in 1171 by the decree of [[Manuel I Komnenos]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=66}} Commercial traffic reached its peak in the 13th century, but continued to be fundamental in the political and social life of Venice until the end of the 16th century. This period saw the establishment of state-sanctioned mude, convoys of ships contracted to merchants which were used to reach faraway lands including India, China, England and Flanders. The Republic's trade was so extensive that in 1325 the existence of Venetian settlements was noted in northern European cities including [[Southampton]] and [[Bruges]] and in Asian cities such as [[Quanzhou|Zaiton]], [[Sudak]], [[Azov]], [[Trabzon]], and [[Amman]] as well as other settlements on the shores of the [[Aral Sea]].{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=158–163}} Venetian trade suffered a sharp decline at the end of the 16th century when competition from the Portuguese, Spanish, English and Dutch became suffocating for Venetian merchants.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=366–367}} |
|||
The goods that the Venetians exchanged mostly by sea and which crowded the central [[Rialto]] market were: cotton, fabrics, iron, wood, [[alum]], salt and spices exchanged as early as the [[9th century]]; the testament of Bishop Orso Participazio, in which pepper is mentioned, dates back to 853.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}} In addition to pepper, Venice traded large quantities of cinnamon, cumin, coriander, cloves and many other spices which played a fundamental role in the preservation of meat, for the flavoring of wines and for medical treatments of which Venetian medicine made a large use. Spices also include sugar, produced in Cyprus and refined in Venice and all the perfumes and incenses widely used by Venetian patricians and during religious functions. In addition to spices, the East also supplied precious stones and silk, vice versa Venice brought European metals, wood, leather and fabrics to the East. Another good of which Venice held a monopoly was salt, which was shared wherever there was some, and given its usefulness the Republic obliged every merchant to transport a certain quantity. The salt monopoly, as well as being a commercial privilege, was also a political deterrent against foreign nations. Another commodity of fundamental importance was the cereals which were managed by the Wheat Chamber in order to combat possible famines. There was also a large import of oil used not only in seasoning but also for lighting.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=158–163}} |
|||
The goods that the Venetians exchanged mostly by sea and which crowded the central [[Rialto]] market were: cotton, fabrics, iron, wood, [[alum]], salt and spices exchanged as early as the 9th century; the testament of Bishop Orso Participazio, in which pepper is mentioned, dates back to 853.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=35–36}} In addition to pepper, Venice traded large quantities of cinnamon, cumin, coriander, cloves and many other spices which played a fundamental role in the preservation of meat, for the flavoring of wines and for medical treatments of which Venetian medicine made a large use. Spices also include sugar, produced in Cyprus and refined in Venice and all the perfumes and incenses widely used by Venetian patricians and during religious functions. In addition to spices, the East also supplied precious stones and silk, vice versa Venice brought European metals, wood, leather and fabrics to the East. Another good of which Venice held a monopoly was salt, which was shared wherever there was some, and given its usefulness the Republic obliged every merchant to transport a certain quantity. The salt monopoly, as well as being a commercial privilege, was also a political deterrent against foreign nations. Another commodity of fundamental importance was the cereals which were managed by the Wheat Chamber to combat possible famines. There was also a large import of oil used not only in seasoning but also for lighting.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=158–163}} |
|||
===Coinage=== |
===Coinage=== |
||
{{main|Coinage of the Republic of Venice}} |
{{main|Coinage of the Republic of Venice}} |
||
The great expansion of Venetian trade began in the |
The great expansion of Venetian trade began in the 12th century and the need for a stable currency became increasingly urgent. In 1202, during the dogate of [[Enrico Dandolo]], the minting of the [[Ducat|silver ducat]] (later called ''matapan'') began, which quickly spread throughout the Mediterranean basin. The ducat corresponded to 26 [[Denarius|denarii]] and weighed approximately two grams.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|pp=91–93}}<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-EDA/1 |title=Grozzo Enrico Dandolo |website=LaMoneta |access-date=16 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217142322/https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-EDA/1 |archive-date=17 February 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> Like the other coins of the Republic of Venice, the ducat had the effigy of the reigning doge, who held the standard of Venice in front of Saint Mark.<ref name=VeneziaLamoneta>{{Cite web |url=https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/cat/W-RV |title=Venezia |website=LaMoneta |access-date=16 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217142230/https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/cat/W-RV |archive-date=17 February 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> |
||
On 31 October 1284, Doge [[Giovanni Dandolo]] decided to mint a new currency, which would later be vital in the Venetian economy: the gold [[Sequin (coin)|sequin]], or ducat.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=164}} The sequin, made of excellent purity gold, weighed approximately 3.5 grams and its minting was interrupted only with the fall of the Republic.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-GDA/1 |title=Ducato |website=LaMoneta |access-date=16 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217142244/https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-GDA/1 |archive-date=17 February 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> Starting from the |
On 31 October 1284, Doge [[Giovanni Dandolo]] decided to mint a new currency, which would later be vital in the Venetian economy: the gold [[Sequin (coin)|sequin]], or ducat.{{sfn|Zorzi|2001|p=164}} The sequin, made of excellent purity gold, weighed approximately 3.5 grams and its minting was interrupted only with the fall of the Republic.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-GDA/1 |title=Ducato |website=LaMoneta |access-date=16 February 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190217142244/https://numismatica-italiana.lamoneta.it/moneta/W-GDA/1 |archive-date=17 February 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> Starting from the 16th century, minting took place in a special building overlooking the Marciano Pier, the [[Zecca of Venice]], over whose activity the [[Council of Forty]] supervised.<ref name=VeneziaLamoneta/> |
||
==Culture== |
==Culture== |
||
===Art=== |
|||
The Venetian Renaissance was one of the fundamental declinations of the [[Italian Renaissance]]. [[Renaissance art]] arrived in [[Veneto]] through [[Donatello]]'s stay in [[Padua]] from 1443 to 1453, later spreading to painting through [[Francesco Squarcione|Squarcione]] and his students. Shortly afterwards the new style also spread to Venice (traditionally linked to [[International Gothic|late Gothic]] culture) following [[Giovanni Bellini]], after which Venetian art was revolutionized by [[Giorgione]] and – at the beginning of the sixteenth century – by [[Titian]]. This era ends with [[Paolo Veronese|Veronese]] and [[Tintoretto]], the latter dying in 1594, who marked the transition towards [[mannerism]]. |
|||
===Theatre=== |
===Theatre=== |
||
[[File:Teatro San Samuele 2007.jpg|right|thumb|The [[Teatro San Samuele]] built in 1655 by Giovanni [[Grimani family|Grimani]]]] |
[[File:Teatro San Samuele 2007.jpg|right|thumb|The [[Teatro San Samuele]] built in 1655 by Giovanni [[Grimani family|Grimani]]]] |
||
Line 420: | Line 469: | ||
* Chambers, D. S. (1970). ''The Imperial Age of Venice, 1380–1580.'' London: Thames & Hudson. The best brief introduction in English, still completely reliable. |
* Chambers, D. S. (1970). ''The Imperial Age of Venice, 1380–1580.'' London: Thames & Hudson. The best brief introduction in English, still completely reliable. |
||
* {{Cite web |url=https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/industria-e-artigianato_(Storia-di-Venezia) |title=Industria e artigianato |language=Italian |access-date=October 14, 2023 |first=Salvatore |last=Ciriacono |year=1996 |archive-date=4 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904130758/https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/industria-e-artigianato_(Storia-di-Venezia) |url-status=live }} |
* {{Cite web |url=https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/industria-e-artigianato_(Storia-di-Venezia) |title=Industria e artigianato |language=Italian |access-date=October 14, 2023 |first=Salvatore |last=Ciriacono |year=1996 |archive-date=4 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230904130758/https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/industria-e-artigianato_(Storia-di-Venezia) |url-status=live }} |
||
* {{Cite book |first=Andrea |last=Da Mosto |title=L'Archivio di Stato di Venezia, indice generale, storico, descrittivo ed analitico |language=Italian |url=http://www.archiviodistatovenezia.it/siasve/DaMosto_1.pdf |access-date=8 February 2019 |year=1937 |volume=1 |editor=Biblioteca d'Arte editrice |location=Rome |archive-date=28 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200228064516/http://www.archiviodistatovenezia.it/siasve/DaMosto_1.pdf |url-status=dead}} |
|||
* {{Cite book |first=Andrea |last=Da Mosto |title=L'Archivio di Stato di Venezia, indice generale, storico, descrittivo ed analitico |language=Italian |url=http://www.archiviodistatovenezia.it/siasve/DaMosto_2.pdf |access-date=12 February 2020 |year=1940 |volume=2 |editor=Biblioteca d'Arte editrice |location=Rome |archive-date=4 March 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160304024318/http://www.archiviodistatovenezia.it/siasve/DaMosto_2.pdf |url-status=dead}} |
|||
* Drechsler, Wolfgang (2002). ''Venice Misappropriated''. ''Trames'' 6(2):192–201. A scathing review of Martin & Romano 2000; also a good summary on the most recent economic and political thought on Venice. |
* Drechsler, Wolfgang (2002). ''Venice Misappropriated''. ''Trames'' 6(2):192–201. A scathing review of Martin & Romano 2000; also a good summary on the most recent economic and political thought on Venice. |
||
* Garrett, Martin (2006). ''Venice: a Cultural History''. Revised edition of ''Venice: a Cultural and Literary Companion'' (2001). |
* Garrett, Martin (2006). ''Venice: a Cultural History''. Revised edition of ''Venice: a Cultural and Literary Companion'' (2001). |
||
Line 436: | Line 487: | ||
* {{cite book |last=Norwich |first=John Julius |author-link=John Julius Norwich |title=A History of Venice |publisher=[[Alfred A. Knopf]] |location=New York |year=1982}} |
* {{cite book |last=Norwich |first=John Julius |author-link=John Julius Norwich |title=A History of Venice |publisher=[[Alfred A. Knopf]] |location=New York |year=1982}} |
||
* Prelli, Alberto (2012). ''Sotto le bandiere di San Marco, le armate della Serenissima nel '600'', Itinera Progetti, Bassano del Grappa |
* Prelli, Alberto (2012). ''Sotto le bandiere di San Marco, le armate della Serenissima nel '600'', Itinera Progetti, Bassano del Grappa |
||
* {{cite book | |
* {{cite book |first=Paolo |last=Preto |title=I servizi segreti di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YpC1mEnpEUAC&q=I+servizi+segreti+di+Venezia.+Spionaggio+e+controspionaggio+ai+tempi+della+Serenissima |year=2004 |editor=il Saggiatore |location=Milan |isbn=978-885650164-3}} |
||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-1 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1853 |volume=1}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-2 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1854 |volume=2}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-3 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1855 |volume=3}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-7 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1858 |volume=7}} |
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-7 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1858 |volume=7}} |
||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-8 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1859 |volume=8}} |
|||
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-9 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1860 |volume=9}} |
* {{cite book |author-link=Samuele Romanin |last=Romanin |first=Samuele |title=Storia documentata di Venezia |language=Italian |url=https://archive.org/details/romanin-storia-documentata-di-venezia-v-9 |publisher=Pietro Naratovich |location=Venice |year=1860 |volume=9}} |
||
* Rosand, David (2001). ''Myths of Venice: The Figuration of a State''. How foreign writers have understood Venice and its art. |
* Rosand, David (2001). ''Myths of Venice: The Figuration of a State''. How foreign writers have understood Venice and its art. |
||
* {{Cite book |first1=Agostino |last1=Sagredo |first2=Federico |last2=Berchet |title=Il Fondaco dei Turchi in Venezia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jBt7PT9qnpAC |year=1860 |editor=Stabilimento di Giuseppe Civelli |location=Milan}} |
* {{Cite book |first1=Agostino |last1=Sagredo |first2=Federico |last2=Berchet |title=Il Fondaco dei Turchi in Venezia |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jBt7PT9qnpAC |year=1860 |editor=Stabilimento di Giuseppe Civelli |location=Milan}} |
||
* Tafuri, Manfredo (1995). ''Venice and the Renaissance''. On Venetian architecture. |
* Tafuri, Manfredo (1995). ''Venice and the Renaissance''. On Venetian architecture. |
||
* Tafel, Gottlieb Lukas Friedrich, and Georg Martin Thomas (1856). '' |
* Tafel, Gottlieb Lukas Friedrich, and Georg Martin Thomas (1856). ''Urkunden zur älteren Handels- und Staatsgeschichte der Republik Venedig {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170329023314/https://books.google.com/books?id=AwMVAAAAQAAJ |date=29 March 2017 }}''. |
||
* Tomaz, Luigi (2007). ''Il confine d'Italia in Istria e Dalmazia''. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. Conselve: Think ADV. |
* Tomaz, Luigi (2007). ''Il confine d'Italia in Istria e Dalmazia''. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. Conselve: Think ADV. |
||
* Tomaz, Luigi. ''In Adriatico nel secondo millennio''. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. |
* Tomaz, Luigi. ''In Adriatico nel secondo millennio''. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. |
Revision as of 16:58, 26 August 2024
Most Serene Republic of Venice | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
697–1797 | |||||||||
Coat of arms
(16–18th cent.) | |||||||||
Motto: Viva San Marco | |||||||||
Greater coat of arms (1706) | |||||||||
Capital | |||||||||
Official languages | |||||||||
Minority languages | |||||||||
Religion | Roman Catholicism (state) | ||||||||
Demonym(s) | Venetian | ||||||||
Government | Unitary mixed parliamentary classical republic under a mercantile oligarchy | ||||||||
Doge | |||||||||
• 697–717 (first) | Paolo Lucio Anafestoa | ||||||||
• 1789–1797 (last) | Ludovico Manin | ||||||||
Legislature | Great Council (since 1172) | ||||||||
• Upper chamber | Senate | ||||||||
• Lower chamber | Council of Ten (since 1310) | ||||||||
Historical era | |||||||||
• Establishment under first dogea as province of the Byzantine Empire | 697 | ||||||||
• Pactum Lotharii (recognition of de facto independence, "province" dropped from name) | 840 | ||||||||
• Golden Bull of Alexios I | 1082 | ||||||||
1177 | |||||||||
1204 | |||||||||
1412 | |||||||||
1571 | |||||||||
1718 | |||||||||
1797 | |||||||||
Currency | Venetian ducat Venetian lira | ||||||||
| |||||||||
a. ^ Paolo Lucio Anafesto is traditionally the first Doge of Venice, but John Julius Norwich suggests that this may be a mistake for Paul, Exarch of Ravenna, and that the traditional second doge Marcello Tegalliano may have been the similarly named magister militum to Paul. Their existence as doges is uncorroborated by any source before the 11th century, but as Norwich suggests, is probably not entirely legendary. Traditionally, the establishment of the Republic is, thus, dated to 697 AD, not to the installation of the first contemporaneously recorded doge, Orso Ipato, in 726. |
The Republic of Venice,[a] traditionally known as La Serenissima,[b] was a sovereign state and maritime republic with its capital in Venice. Founded, according to tradition, in 697 by Paolo Lucio Anafesto, over the course of its 1,100 years of history it established itself as one of the major European commercial and naval powers. Initially extended in the Dogado area (a territory currently comparable to the Metropolitan City of Venice), during its history it annexed a large part of Northeast Italy, Istria, Dalmatia, the coasts of present-day Montenegro and Albania as well as numerous islands in the Adriatic and eastern Ionian seas. At the height of its expansion, between the 13th and 16th centuries, it also governed the Peloponnese, Crete and Cyprus, most of the Greek islands, as well as several cities and ports in the eastern Mediterranean.
The islands of the Venetian Lagoon in the 7th century, after having experienced a period of substantial increase in population, were organized into Maritime Venice, a Byzantine duchy dependent on the Exarchate of Ravenna. With the fall of the Exarchate and the weakening of Byzantine power, the Duchy of Venice arose, led by a doge and established on the island of Rialto; it prospered from maritime trade with the Byzantine Empire and other eastern states. To safeguard the trade routes, between the 9th and 11th centuries the Duchy waged several wars, which ensured its complete dominion over the Adriatic. Owing to participation in the Crusades, penetration into eastern markets became increasingly stronger and, between the 12th and 13th centuries, Venice managed to extend its power into numerous eastern emporiums and commercial ports. The supremacy over the Mediterranean Sea led the Republic to the clash with Genoa, which lasted until the 14th century, when, after having risked complete collapse during the War of Chioggia (with the Genoese army and fleet in the lagoon for a long period), Venice quickly managed to recover from the territorial losses suffered with the Treaty of Turin of 1381 and begin expansion on the mainland.
Venetian expansion, however, led to the coalition of the Habsburg monarchy, Spain and France in the League of Cambrai, which in 1509 defeated the Republic of Venice in the Battle of Agnadello. While maintaining most of its mainland possessions, Venice was defeated and the attempt to expand the eastern dominions caused a long series of wars against the Ottoman Empire, which ended only in the 18th century with the Treaty of Passarowitz of 1718 and which caused the loss of all possessions in the Aegean. Although still a thriving cultural centre, the Republic of Venice was occupied by Napoleon's French troops and its territories were divided with the Habsburg monarchy following the ratification of the Treaty of Campo Formio.
Throughout its history, the Republic of Venice was characterized by its political order. Inherited from the previous Byzantine administrative structures, its head of state was the doge, a position which became elective from the end of the 9th century. In addition to the doge, the administration of the Republic was directed by various assemblies: the Great Council, with legislative functions, which was supported by the Minor Council, the Council of Forty and the Council of Ten, responsible for judicial matters, and the Senate.
Etymology
During its long history, the Republic of Venice took on various names, all closely linked to the titles attributed to the doge. During the 8th century, when Venice still depended on the Byzantine Empire, the doge was called in Latin Dux Venetiarum Provinciae ('Doge of the Province of Venice'),[3] and then, starting from 840, Dux Veneticorum ('Doge of the Venetians'), following the signing of the Pactum Lotharii. This commercial agreement, stipulated between the Duchy of Venice (Ducatum Venetiae) and the Carolingian Empire, de facto ratified the independence of Venice from the Byzantine Empire.[4][5][6]
In the following century, references to Venice as a Byzantine dominion disappeared, and in a document from 976 there is a mention of the most glorious Domino Venetiarum ('Lord of Venice'), where the 'most glorious' appellative had already been used for the first time in the Pactum Lotharii and where the appellative "lord" refers to the fact that the doge was still considered like a king, even if elected by the popular assembly.[7][8] Gaining independence, Venice also began to expand on the coasts of the Adriatic Sea, and so starting from 1109, following the conquest of Dalmatia and the Croatian coast, the doge formally received the title of Venetiae Dalmatiae atque Chroatiae Dux ('Doge of Venice, Dalmatia and Croatia'),[9][10] a name that continued to be used until the 18th century.[11] Starting from the 15th century, the documents written in Latin were joined by those in the Venetian language, and in parallel with the events in Italy, the Duchy of Venice also changed its name, becoming the Lordship of Venice, which as written in the peace treaty of 1453 with Sultan Mehmed II was fully named the Illustrissima et Excellentissima deta Signoria de Venexia ('The Most Illustrious and Excellent Signoria of Venice').[12]
During the 17th century, monarchical absolutism asserted itself in many countries of continental Europe, radically changing the European political landscape. This change made it possible to more markedly determine the differences between monarchies and republics: while the former had economies governed by strict laws and dominated by agriculture, the latter lived off of commercial affairs and free markets. Moreover, the monarchies, in addition to being led by a single ruling family, were more prone to war and religious uniformity. This increasingly noticeable difference between monarchy and republic began to be specified also in official documents, and it was hence that names such as the Republic of Genoa or the Republic of the Seven United Provinces were born. The Lordship of Venice also adapted to this new terminology, becoming the Most Serene Republic of Venice (Italian: Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia; Template:Lang-vec), a name by which it is best known today.[13][14][15][16] Similarly, the doge was also given the nickname of serenissimo[11] or more simply that of His Serenity.[17] From the 17th century the Republic of Venice took on other more or less official names such as the Venetian State or the Venetian Republic. The republic is often referred to as La Serenissima, in reference to its title as one of the "Most Serene Republics".[18]
History
9th–10th century: The ducal age
The Duchy of Venice was born in the 9th century from the Byzantine territories of Maritime Venice. According to tradition, the first doge was elected in 697, but this figure is of dubious historicity and comparable to that of the exarch Paul, who, similarly to the doge, was assassinated in 727 following a revolt. Father Pietro Antonio of Venetia, in his history of the lagoon city published in 1688, writes: "The precise time in which that family arrived in the Adria is not found, but rather, what already an inhabitant of the islands, by the princes, who welcomed citizens, and supported with the advantage of significant riches, in the year 697 she contributed to the nomination of the first Prince Marco Contarini, one of the 22 Tribunes of the Islands, who made the election". In 726, Emperor Leo III attempted to extend iconoclasm to the Exarchate of Ravenna, causing numerous revolts throughout the territory. In reaction to the reform, the local populations appointed several duces to replace the Byzantine governors and in particular Venetia appointed Orso as its doge, who governed the lagoon for a decade. Following his death, the Byzantines entrusted the government of the province to the regime of the magistri militum, which lasted until 742 when the emperor granted the people the appointment of a dux. The Venetians elected by acclamation Theodato, son of Orso, who decided to move the capital of the duchy from Heraclia to Metamauco.[19]
The Lombard conquest of Ravenna in 751 and the subsequent conquest of the Lombard kingdom by Charlemagne's Franks in 774, with the creation of the Carolingian Empire in 800, considerably changed the geopolitical context of the lagoon, leading the Venetians to divide into two factions : a pro-Frankish party led by the city of Equilium and a pro-Byzantine party with a stronghold in Heraclia. After a long series of skirmishes in 805, Doge Obelerio decided to attack both cities simultaneously, deporting their population to the capital. Having taken control of the situation, the doge placed Venezia under Frankish protection, but a Byzantine naval blockade convinced him to renew his loyalty to the Eastern Emperor. With the intention of conquering Venezia in 810, the Frankish army commanded by Pepin invaded the lagoon, forcing the local population to retreat to Rivoalto, thus starting a siege which ended with the arrival of the Byzantine fleet and the retreat of the Franks. Following the failed Frankish conquest, Doge Obelerio was replaced by the pro-Byzantine nobleman Agnello Participazio who definitively moved the capital to Rivoalto in 812, thus decreeing the birth of the city of Venice.[20]
With his election, Agnello Partecipazio attempted to make the ducal office hereditary by associating an heir, the co-dux, with the throne. The system brought Agnello's two sons, Giustiniano and Giovanni, to the ducal position, who was deposed in 836 due to his inadequacy to counter the Narentine pirates in Dalmatia.[21] Following the deposition of Giovanni Partecipazio, Pietro Tradonico was elected who, with the promulgation of the Pactum Lotharii, a commercial treaty between Venice and the Carolingian Empire, began the long process of detachment of the province from the Byzantine Empire.[22] After Tradonico was killed following a conspiracy in 864, Orso I Participazio was elected and resumed the fight against piracy, managing to protect the Dogado from attacks by the Saracens and the Patriarchate of Aquileia. Orso managed to assign the dukedom to his eldest son Giovanni II Participazio who, after conquering Comacchio, a rival city of Venice in the salt trade, decided to abdicate in favor of his brother, at the time patriarch of Grado, who refused. Since there was no heir in 887 the people gathered in the Concio and elected Pietro I Candiano by acclamation.[23]
The Concio managed to elect six doges up to Pietro III Candiano who in 958 assigned the position of co-dux to his son Pietro who became doge the following year. Due to his land holdings, Pietro IV Candiano had a political vision close to that of the Holy Roman Empire and consequently attempted to establish feudalism in Venice as well, causing a revolt in 976 which led to the burning of the capital and the killing of the doge.[24] These events led the Venetian patriciate to gain a growing influence on the doge's policies and the conflicts that arose following the doge's assassination were resolved only in 991 with the election of Pietro II Orseolo.[25]
11th–12th century: Relations with the Byzantine Empire
Pietro II Orseolo gave a notable boost to Venetian commercial expansion by stipulating new commercial privileges with the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. In addition to diplomacy, the doge resumed the war against the Narentan pirates that began in the 9th century and in the year 1000 he managed to subjugate the coastal cities of Istria and Dalmatia.[26] The Great Schism of 1054 and the outbreak of the investiture struggle in 1073 marginally involved Venetian politics which instead focused its attention on the arrival of the Normans in southern Italy. The Norman occupation of Durrës and Corfu in 1081 pushed the Byzantine Empire to request the aid of the Venetian fleet which, with the promise of obtaining extensive commercial privileges and reimbursement of military expenses, decided to take part in the Byzantine-Norman wars.[27] The following year, Emperor Alexios I Komnenos granted Venice the chrysobol, a commercial privilege that allowed Venetian merchants substantial tax exemptions in numerous Byzantine ports and the establishment of a Venetian neighbourhood in Durrës and Constantinople. The war ended in 1085 when, following the death of the leader Robert Guiscard, the Norman army abandoned its positions to return to Puglia.[28]
Having taken office in 1118, Emperor John II Komnenos decided not to renew the chrysobol of 1082, arousing the reaction of Venice which declared war on the Byzantine Empire in 1122. The war ended in 1126 with the victory of Venice which forced the emperor to stipulate a new agreement characterized by even better conditions than the previous ones, thus making the Byzantine Empire totally dependent on Venetian trade and protection.[29] With the intention of weakening the growing Venetian power, the emperor provided substantial commercial support to the maritime republics of Ancona, Genoa and Pisa, making coexistence with Venice, which was now hegemonic on the Adriatic Sea, increasingly difficult, so much so that it was renamed the "Gulf of Venice". In 1171, following the emperor's decision to expel the Venetian merchants from Constantinople, a new war broke out which was resolved with the restoration of the status quo.[30] At the end of the 12th century, the commercial traffic of Venetian merchants extended throughout the East and they could count on immense and solid capital.[31]
As in the rest of Italy, starting from the 12th century, Venice also underwent the transformations that led to the age of the municipalities. In that century, the doge's power began to decline: initially supported only by a few judges, in 1130 it was decided to place the Consilium Sapientium, which would later become the Great Council of Venice, alongside his power. In the same period, in addition to the expulsion of the clergy from public life, new assemblies such as the Council of Forty and the Minor Council were established and in his inauguration speech the Doge was forced to declare loyalty to the Republic with the promissione ducale;[32] thus the Commune of Venice, the set of all the assemblies aimed at regulating the power of the doge, began to take shape.[33]
13th–14th century: The Crusades and the rivalry with Genoa
In the 12th century, Venice decided not to participate in the Crusades due to its commercial interests in the East and instead concentrated on maintaining its possessions in Dalmatia which were repeatedly besieged by the Hungarians. The situation changed in 1202 when the Doge Enrico Dandolo decided to exploit the expedition of the Fourth Crusade to conclude the Zara War and the following year, after twenty years of conflict, Venice conquered the city and won the war, regaining control of Dalmatia.[34] The Venetian crusader fleet, however, did not stop in Dalmatia, but continued towards Constantinople to besiege it in 1204, thus putting an end to the Byzantine Empire and formally making Venice an independent state, severing the last ties with the former Byzantine ruler.[35] The empire was dismembered in the Crusader states and from the division Venice obtained numerous ports in the Morea and several islands in the Aegean Sea including Crete and Euboea, thus giving life to the Stato da Màr. In addition to the territorial conquests, the doge was awarded the title of Lord of a quarter and a half of the Eastern Roman Empire, thus obtaining the faculty of appointing the Latin Patriarchate of Constantinople and the possibility of sending a Venetian representative to the government of the Eastern Latin Empire.[36] With the end of the Fourth Crusade, Venice concentrated its efforts on the conquest of Crete, which intensely involved the Venetian army until 1237.[37]
Venice's control over the eastern trade routes became pressing and this caused an increase in conflicts with Genoa which in 1255 exploded into the War of Saint Sabas; on 24 June 1258 the two republics faced each other in the Battle of Acre which ended with an overwhelming Venetian victory. In 1261 the Empire of Nicaea with the help of the Republic of Genoa managed to dissolve the Eastern Latin Empire and re-establish the Byzantine Empire. The war between Genoa and Venice resumed and after a long series of battles the war ended in 1270 with the Peace of Cremona.[38] In 1281 Venice defeated the Republic of Ancona in battle and in 1293 a new war between Genoa, the Byzantine Empire and Venice broke out, won by the Genoese following the Battle of Curzola and ending in 1299.[39]
During the war, various administrative reforms were implemented in Venice, new assemblies were established to replace popular ones such as the Senate and in the Great Council power began to concentrate in the hands of about ten families. To avoid the birth of a lordship, the Doge decided to increase the number of members of the Maggior Consiglio while leaving the number of families unchanged and so the Serrata del Maggior Consiglio was implemented in 1297.[40] Following the provision, the power of some of the old houses decreased and in 1310, under the pretext of defeat in the Ferrara War, these families organized themselves in the Tiepolo conspiracy.[41] Once the coup d'état failed and the establishment of a lordship was averted, Doge Pietro Gradenigo established the Council of Ten, which was assigned the task of repressing any threat to the security of the state.[42]
In the Venetian hinterland, the war waged by Mastino II della Scala caused serious economic losses to Venetian trade, so in 1336 Venice gave birth to the anti-Scaliger league. The following year the coalition expanded further and Padua returned to the dominion of the Carraresi. In 1338, Venice conquered Treviso, the first nucleus of the Domini di Terraferma, and in 1339 it signed a peace treaty in which the Scaligeri promised not to interfere in Venetian trade and to recognize the sovereignty of Venice over the Trevisan March.[43]
In 1343 Venice took part in the Smyrniote crusades, but its participation was suspended due to the siege of Zadar by the Hungarians. The Genoese expansion to the east, which caused the Black Death, brought the rivalry between the two republics to resurface and in 1350 they faced each other in the War of the Straits. Following the defeat in the Battle of Sapienza, Doge Marino Faliero attempted to establish a city lordship, but the coup d'état was foiled by the Council of Ten which on 17 April 1355 condemned the Doge to death. The ensuing political instability convinced Louis I of Hungary to attack Dalmatia which was conquered in 1358 with the signing of the Treaty of Zadar. The weakness of the Republic pushed Crete and Trieste to revolt, but the rebellions were quelled, thus reaffirming Venetian dominion over the Stato da Màr. The skirmishes between the Venetians and the Genoese resumed and in 1378 the two republics faced each other in the War of Chioggia. Initially the Genoese managed to conquer Chioggia and vast areas of the Venetian Lagoon, but in the end it was the Venetians who prevailed; the war ended definitively on 8 August 1381 with the Treaty of Turin which sanctioned the exit of the Genoese from the competition for dominion over the Mediterranean.[44]
15th century: Territorial expansion
In 1403, the last major battle between the Genoese (now under French rule) and Venice was fought at Modon, and the final victory resulted in maritime hegemony and dominance of the eastern trade routes. The latter would soon be contested, however, by the inexorable rise of the Ottoman Empire. Hostilities began after Prince Mehmed I ended the civil war of the Ottoman Interregnum and established himself as sultan. The conflict escalated until Pietro Loredan won a crushing victory against the Turks off Gallipoli in 1416.
Venice expanded as well along the Dalmatian coast from Istria to Albania, which was acquired from King Ladislaus of Naples during the civil war in Hungary. Ladislaus was about to lose the conflict and had decided to escape to Naples, but before doing so he agreed to sell his now practically forfeit rights on the Dalmatian cities for the reduced sum of 100,000 ducats. Venice exploited the situation and quickly installed nobility to govern the area, for example, Count Filippo Stipanov in Zara. This move by the Venetians was a response to the threatening expansion of Gian Galeazzo Visconti, Duke of Milan. Control over the northeast main land routes was also a necessity for the safety of the trades. By 1410, Venice had a navy of 3,300 ships (manned by 36,000 men) and had taken over most of what is now the Veneto, including the cities of Verona (which swore its loyalty in the Devotion of Verona to Venice in 1405) and Padua.[45]
Slaves were plentiful in the Italian city-states as late as the 15th century. The Venetian slave trade was divided in to the Balkan slave trade and the Black Sea slave trade. Between 1414 and 1423, some 10,000 slaves, imported from Caffa (via the Black Sea slave trade), were sold in Venice.[46]
In the early 15th century, the republic began to expand onto the Terraferma. Thus, Vicenza, Belluno, and Feltre were acquired in 1404, and Padua, Verona, and Este in 1405. The situation in Dalmatia had been settled in 1408 by a truce with King Sigismund of Hungary, but the difficulties of Hungary finally granted to the republic the consolidation of its Adriatic dominions. The situation culminated in the Battle of Motta in late August 1412, when an invading army of Hungarians, Germans and Croats, led by Pippo Spano and Voivode Miklós Marczali[47] attacked the Venetian positions at Motta[48] and suffered a heavy defeat. At the expiration of the truce in 1420, Venice immediately invaded the Patriarchate of Aquileia and subjected Traù, Spalato, Durazzo, and other Dalmatian cities. In Lombardy, Venice acquired Brescia in 1426, Bergamo in 1428, and Cremona in 1499.
In 1454, a conspiracy for a rebellion against Venice was dismantled in Candia. The conspiracy was led by Sifis Vlastos as an opposition to the religious reforms for the unification of Churches agreed at the Council of Florence.[49] In 1481, Venice retook nearby Rovigo, which it had held previously from 1395 to 1438.
The Ottoman Empire started sea campaigns as early as 1423, when it waged a seven-year war with the Venetian Republic over maritime control of the Aegean, the Ionian, and the Adriatic Seas. The wars with Venice resumed after the Ottomans captured the Kingdom of Bosnia in 1463, and lasted until a favorable peace treaty was signed in 1479 just after the troublesome siege of Shkodra. In 1480, no longer hampered by the Venetian fleet, the Ottomans besieged Rhodes and briefly captured Otranto.
In February 1489, the island of Cyprus, previously a crusader state (the Kingdom of Cyprus), was added to Venice's holdings. By 1490, the population of Venice had risen to about 180,000 people.[50]
16th century: League of Cambrai, the loss of Cyprus, and Battle of Lepanto
War with the Ottomans resumed from 1499 to 1503. In 1499, Venice allied itself with Louis XII of France against Milan, gaining Cremona. In the same year, the Ottoman sultan moved to attack Lepanto by land and sent a large fleet to support his offensive by sea. Antonio Grimani, more a businessman and diplomat than a sailor, was defeated in the sea battle of Zonchio in 1499. The Turks once again sacked Friuli. Preferring peace to total war both against the Turks and by sea, Venice surrendered the bases of Lepanto, Durazzo, Modon, and Coron.
Venice's attention was diverted from its usual maritime position by the delicate situation in Romagna, then one of the richest lands in Italy, which was nominally part of the Papal States, but effectively divided into a series of small lordships which were difficult for Rome's troops to control. Eager to take some of Venice's lands, all neighbouring powers joined in the League of Cambrai in 1508, under the leadership of Pope Julius II. The pope wanted Romagna; Emperor Maximilian I: Friuli and Veneto; Spain: the Apulian ports; the king of France: Cremona; the king of Hungary: Dalmatia, and each one some of another's part. The offensive against the huge army enlisted by Venice was launched from France.
On 14 May 1509, Venice was crushingly defeated at the battle of Agnadello, in the Ghiara d'Adda, marking one of the most delicate points in Venetian history. French and imperial troops were occupying Veneto, but Venice managed to extricate itself through diplomatic efforts. The Apulian ports were ceded to come to terms with Spain, and Julius II soon recognized the danger brought by the eventual destruction of Venice (then the only Italian power able to face kingdoms like France or empires like the Ottomans).
The citizens of the mainland rose to the cry of "Marco, Marco", and Andrea Gritti recaptured Padua in July 1509, successfully defending it against the besieging imperial troops. Spain and the pope broke off their alliance with France, and Venice regained Brescia and Verona from France, also. After seven years of ruinous war, the Serenissima regained its mainland dominions west to the Adda River. Although the defeat had turned into a victory, the events of 1509 marked the end of the Venetian expansion.
In 1489, the first year of Venetian control of Cyprus, Turks attacked the Karpasia Peninsula, pillaging and taking captives to be sold into slavery. In 1539, the Turkish fleet attacked and destroyed Limassol. Fearing the ever-expanding Ottoman Empire, the Venetians had fortified Famagusta, Nicosia, and Kyrenia, but most other cities were easy prey. By 1563, the population of Venice had dropped to about 168,000 people.[50]
In the summer of 1570, the Turks struck again but this time with a full-scale invasion rather than a raid. About 60,000 troops, including cavalry and artillery, under the command of Mustafa Pasha landed unopposed near Limassol on 2 July 1570 and laid siege to Nicosia. In an orgy of victory on the day that the city fell – 9 September 1570 – 20,000 Nicosians were put to death, and every church, public building, and palace was looted.[51] Word of the massacre spread, and a few days later, Mustafa took Kyrenia without having to fire a shot. Famagusta, however, resisted and put up a defense that lasted from September 1570 until August 1571.
The fall of Famagusta marked the beginning of the Ottoman period in Cyprus. Two months later, the naval forces of the Holy League, composed mainly of Venetian, Spanish, and papal ships under the command of Don John of Austria, defeated the Turkish fleet at the battle of Lepanto.[52] Despite victory at sea over the Turks, Cyprus remained under Ottoman rule for the next three centuries. By 1575, the population of Venice was about 175,000 people, but partly as a result of the plague of 1575–76 the population dropped to 124,000 people by 1581.[50]
17th century
According to economic historian Jan De Vries, Venice's economic power in the Mediterranean had declined significantly by the start of the 17th century. De Vries attributes this decline to the loss of the spice trade, a declining uncompetitive textile industry, competition in book publishing from a rejuvenated Catholic Church, the adverse impact of the Thirty Years' War on Venice's key trade partners, and the increasing cost of cotton and silk imports to Venice.[53]
In 1606, a conflict between Venice and the Holy See began with the arrest of two clerics accused of petty crimes and with a law restricting the Church's right to enjoy and acquire landed property. Pope Paul V held that these provisions were contrary to canon law, and demanded that they be repealed. When this was refused, he placed Venice under an interdict which forbade clergymen from exercising almost all priestly duties. The republic paid no attention to the interdict or the act of excommunication and ordered its priests to carry out their ministry. It was supported in its decisions by the Servite friar Paolo Sarpi, a sharp polemical writer who was nominated to be the Signoria's adviser on theology and canon law in 1606. The interdict was lifted after a year, when France intervened and proposed a formula of compromise. Venice was satisfied with reaffirming the principle that no citizen was superior to the normal processes of law.[54]
Rivalry with Habsburg Spain and the Holy Roman Empire led to Venice's last significant wars in Italy and the northern Adriatic. Between 1615 and 1618 Venice fought Archduke Ferdinand of Austria in the Uskok War in the northern Adriatic and on the Republic's eastern border, while in Lombardy to the west, Venetian troops skirmished with the forces of Don Pedro de Toledo Osorio, Spanish governor of Milan, around Crema in 1617 and in the countryside of Romano di Lombardia in 1618. A fragile peace did not last, and in 1629 the Most Serene Republic returned to war with Spain and the Holy Roman Empire in the War of the Mantuan Succession. During the brief war a Venetian army led by provveditore Zaccaria Sagredo and reinforced by French allies was disastrously routed by Imperial forces at the battle of Villabuona, and Venice's closest ally Mantua was sacked. Reversals elsewhere for the Holy Roman Empire and Spain ensured the republic suffered no territorial loss, and the duchy of Mantua was restored to Charles II Gonzaga, Duke of Nevers, who was the candidate backed by Venice and France.
The latter half of the 17th century also had prolonged wars with the Ottoman Empire; in the Cretan War (1645–1669), after a heroic siege that lasted 21 years, Venice lost its major overseas possession – the island of Crete (although it kept the control of the bases of Spinalonga and Suda) – while it made some advances in Dalmatia. In 1684, however, taking advantage of the Ottoman involvement against Austria in the Great Turkish War, the republic initiated the Morean War, which lasted until 1699 and in which it was able to conquer the Morea peninsula in southern Greece.
18th century: Decline
These gains did not last, however; in December 1714, the Turks began the last Turkish–Venetian War, when the Morea was "without any of those supplies which are so desirable even in countries where aid is near at hand which are not liable to attack from the sea".[55]
The Turks took the islands of Tinos and Aegina, crossed the isthmus, and took Corinth. Daniele Dolfin, commander of the Venetian fleet, thought it better to save the fleet than risk it for the Morea. When he eventually arrived on the scene, Nauplia, Modon, Corone, and Malvasia had fallen. Levkas in the Ionian islands, and the bases of Spinalonga and Suda on Crete, which still remained in Venetian hands, were abandoned. The Turks finally landed on Corfu, but its defenders managed to throw them back.
In the meantime, the Turks had suffered a grave defeat by the Austrians in the Battle of Petrovaradin on 5 August 1716. Venetian naval efforts in the Aegean Sea and the Dardanelles in 1717 and 1718, however, met with little success. With the Treaty of Passarowitz (21 July 1718), Austria made large territorial gains, but Venice lost the Morea, for which its small gains in Albania and Dalmatia were little compensation. This was the last war with the Ottoman Empire. By the year 1792, the once-great Venetian merchant fleet had declined to a mere 309 merchantmen.[56] Although Venice declined as a seaborne empire, it remained in possession of its continental domain north of the Po Valley, extending west almost to Milan. Many of its cities benefited greatly from the Pax Venetiae (Venetian peace) throughout the 18th century.
Angelo Emo was named the last Captain General of the Sea (Capitano Generale da Mar) of the Republic in 1784.
Fall
By 1796, the Republic of Venice could no longer defend itself since its war fleet numbered only four galleys and seven galiots.[57] In spring 1796, Piedmont (the Duchy of Savoy) fell to the invading French, and the Austrians were beaten from Montenotte to Lodi. The army under Napoleon crossed the frontiers of neutral Venice in pursuit of the enemy. By the end of the year, the French troops were occupying the Venetian state up to the Adige River. Vicenza, Cadore and Friuli were held by the Austrians. With the campaigns of the next year, Napoleon aimed for the Austrian possessions across the Alps. In the preliminaries to the Peace of Leoben, the terms of which remained secret, the Austrians were to take the Venetian possessions in the Balkans as the price of peace (18 April 1797) while France acquired the Lombard part of the state.
After Napoleon's ultimatum, Ludovico Manin surrendered unconditionally on 12 May and abdicated, while the Major Council declared the end of the republic. According to Bonaparte's orders, the public powers passed to a provisional municipality under the French military governor. On 17 October, France and Austria signed the Treaty of Campo Formio, agreeing to share all the territory of the republic, with a new border just west of the Adige. Italian democrats, especially young poet Ugo Foscolo, viewed the treaty as a betrayal. The metropolitan part of the disbanded republic became an Austrian territory, under the name of Venetian Province (Provincia Veneta in Italian, Provinz Venedig in German).
Legacy
Though the economic vitality of the Venetian Republic had started to decline since the 16th century with the movement of international trade towards the Atlantic, its political regime still appeared in the 18th century as a model for the philosophers of the Enlightenment.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was hired in July 1743 as secretary by Comte de Montaigu, who had been named ambassador of the French in Venice. This short experience, nevertheless, awakened the interest of Rousseau to the policy, which led him to design a large book of political philosophy.[58] After the Discourse on the Origin and Basis of Inequality Among Men (1755), he published The Social Contract (1762).
Politics
Following the Lombard occupation and the progressive migration of the Roman populations, new coastal settlements were born in which the local assemblies, the comitia, elected a Tribune to govern the local administration, perpetuating the Roman custom started in the last years of the Western Roman Empire. Between the end of the 7th century and the beginning of the 8th, a new political reform affected Venetia: like the other Byzantine provinces of Italy it was transformed into a duchy, at the head of which was the doge. Following the brief regime of the magistri militum, in 742 ducal electivity was transferred from the Empire to local assemblies, thus sanctioning the beginning of the ducal monarchy which lasted, with ups and downs, until the 11th century.[59]
If the first stable form of involvement of the patriciate in the management of power occurred with the institution of the curia ducis, starting from 1141 with the beginning of the municipal age, an unstoppable process of limitation and removal of ducal power from part of the nascent mercantile aristocracy gathered in the Great Council, the largest assembly of the Veneciarum municipality. In the 13th century the popular assembly of the concio was progressively stripped of all its powers and, similarly to the Italian city lordships, in Venice too power began to concentrate in the hands of a small number of families.[60] To avoid the birth of a lordship and dilute the power of the old houses, the Lockout of the Great Council took place in 1297, a measure that increased the number of members of the Great Council leaving the number of families unchanged and therefore precluding the entry of the new nobility.[40]
Between the 13th and 14th centuries the power of the doge became purely formal and that of the popular assemblies null and void, even if the tannery was formally abolished only in 1423; this decreed the birth of an oligarchic and aristocratic republic which continued to exist until the fall of the Republic.[61] The organization of the state was entrusted to many nobles divided into numerous assemblies which generally remained in office for less than a year and met in Venice in the Doge's Palace, the political center of the Republic.
Government system
Doge
The Doge (from the Latin dux, or commander) was the head of state of the Republic of Venice, the position lasted for life and his name appeared on coins, ducal bulls, judicial sentences and letters sent to foreign governments. His greatest power was to promulgate laws; he also commanded the army during periods of war and had the Sopragastaldo execute all judicial sentences in his name.[62] The election of the Doge was decreed by an assembly of forty-one electors chosen after a long series of elections and lots, to avoid fraud, and once elected the Doge had the obligation to pronounce the promissione ducale, an oath in which was promised loyalty to the Republic and the limitations to its powers were recognized.[63][64]
The Signoria was the most dignified assembly of the Venetian governmental system and was composed of the Doge, the Minor Council and the three leaders of the Quarantia Criminale. The Signoria had the fundamental task of presiding over the major assemblies of the state: the College of the Wise, the Great Council, the Senate and the Council of Ten. The members of the Signoria also had the power to propose and vote on laws in the presided over assemblies and to convene the Great Council at any time. The Minor Council was elected by the Major Council and was made up of six councilors elected three at a time every eight months; since they remained in office for one year, the three outgoing councilors played the role of Inferior Councilors for four months and presided over the Quarantia Criminale representing the Signoria. Within the Minor Council one of the Three State Inquisitors was elected and following the death of the Doge it elected a Deputy Doge and presided over the Republic with the rest of the Signoria.[65][66]
Over the centuries, 120 doges followed one another in Venice. Among the most illustrious names are:
- Paolo Lucio Anafesto, the first Doge of Venice.
- Pietro II Orseolo, who established Venetian dominion over the Adriatic and conquered Dalmatia.
- Enrico Dandolo, who led the Republic of Venice to domination over the Byzantine Empire, giving rise to Venice's maritime empire.
- Marino Faliero, who was beheaded for attempting to found a Lordship.
- Francesco Foscari, who expanded the dominions of the Republic into the mainland.
- Leonardo Loredan, who led Venice in resistance against the League of Cambrai, the coalition of the most important European states against Venice.
- Francesco Morosini, who led Venice in the recovery of Morea (the Peloponnese), the last great redemption of the Republic against the Turks.
- Ludovico Manin, the last Doge of Venice.
College of the Sages
The College of the Sages was composed of three subcommissions called "hands": the Sages of the Council, the Sages of the Mainland and the Sages of the Orders, it constituted the summit of the executive power, was elected by the Senate and when it was presided over by the Signoria it took the name of Full College. There were six Sages of the Council and they established the agenda of the work of the Senate while the Sages of the Orders, initially responsible for the management of the mude and the navy, progressively lost importance. The Sages of the Mainland were five, one was the Sage of the Ceremonials, one the Sage who dealt with the dispatch of the laws, while the other three were proper ministers:
- The Sage of the Finances, analogous to the finance minister, was superior and close collaborator of the camerlenghi;[67]
- The Sage of the Scripture, analogous to the minister of war, was in charge of the economic management of the troops and military justice;[68]
- The Sage of the Ordinances, was responsible for the management of the Cernida, the local defense militias.[68]
The Full College had as its primary function that of maintaining relations with foreign states and with the Church, it welcomed ambassadors, nuncios of subject cities and members of the clergy.[69][70]
Great Council
The Great Council was made up of all noble men of at least twenty-five years of age registered in the Libro d'Oro and held legislative and elective power. Initially made up of around four hundred members, its size increased considerably following the Lockout of the Great Council, so much so that in the 16th century 2,095 nobles participated in a session and in 1527 those entitled to sit reached 2,746.[40] Each member of the Great Council was allowed to vote and propose a new law which then had to be approved by the Council itself, which was also responsible for reforming and repealing the laws. While the legislative power was mostly held by the Senate, the elective power was almost exclusive to the Great Council. The council elected eighty-four magistracies including: the Minor Council, the Senate, the Council of Forty, the Council of Ten, the grand chancellor and the Avogadoria de Comùn as well as all the captains, the podestà, the provveditori, the camerlenghi and indirectly the Doge.[71][72]
Principal magistrates
- Senate
- Also known as the Council of Pregadi, the Senate primarily held legislative power. Made up of around 300 members over thirty-five years of age, 120 were senators elected by the Great Council (60 plus 60 de zonta) to which were added the Council of Ten, the Council of Forty, the College of the Sages and many other magistracies which often held exclusive power to vote or propose laws. The Senate was responsible for legislating mainly on financial, commercial and foreign policies.[73][74]
- Council of Forty
- The Council of Forty was the body that held maximum judicial power. It was divided into: Quarantia Criminale for criminal trials, Quarantia Civil Vecchia and Quarantia Civil Nuova for civil trials in the Dogado and the Mainland Dominions and into two panels of fifteen and twenty-five members for cases of minor importance. Each of the Quarantie was made up of forty members which, added to those of the colleges, made 160 members. The judges rotated starting from the colleges and then arriving at the Quarantia Criminale and worked for eight months in each assembly, remaining in office for two years and eight months.[75][76]
- Avogadoria de Comùn
- Similar to today's public prosecutor, the Avogadoria de Comùn represented the interests of the community and the state. The advocates remained in office for sixteen months and were also responsible for drawing up the Libro d'Oro in which all those entitled to sit on the Great Council were registered.[77]
- Council of Ten
- A special state security agency created following the Tiepolo conspiracy, it was made up of ten members who had the aim of guaranteeing the security of the Republic and its government through any means. The Council acted as a court with jurisdiction over state security matters; its power was so broad that in 1355 it even condemned the Doge Marino Faliero to death. Having such broad power, the position lasted only one year and furthermore the ten could not exercise other public functions and had no family ties between them. To guarantee the secrecy of its actions, the Council was entrusted with a sum of money which it administered independently. The Three State Inquisitors, who could replace ordinary judges and proceeded in secret, had greater power within the body.[78]
Administrative subdivisions
The fundamental administrative subdivision of the Republic of Venice was the regiment, a small territory administered by a podestà, to which a city was headed. The regiments were born only in the first half of the 15th century via the mechanism of dedications. The Republic required the deposition of the lord who was promptly replaced with a rector, after which the city's ambassadors went to Venice where the city's indissoluble bond with the Republic was defined. Because of this mechanism, the Republic of Venice managed to incorporate many territories.[79]
To govern the most important regiments in an impartial and effective way, the podestà was chosen from among the members of the Venetian patriciate, while in secondary regiments the rector was often chosen from among the local nobility.[80] Despite this, the laws and administration varied greatly based on the peculiarities of the regiment itself. The Republic therefore left a lot of freedom of government to the podestà, though at the end of their mandate, after a maximum of four years, the podestà was obliged to deliver a report on their administration.[81]
The podestà, who depending on the territory administered was also called rector, bailo, count or governor, in larger regiments was also assisted by two councilors and other administrators. The army and police were under the command of the Captain[82] while the borders were supervised by the Castellani, the Chancellors administered justice[83] while finance was managed by the Camerlenghi.[84] The superintendent generals acted above the podestàs and, in addition to having the power to choose the rectors in case of danger, were normally involved in supervising the podestàs by sending supervisors called sindi inquisitors.[85]
The regiments ultimately formed three administrative regions:
- Dogado
- The Dogado was the original territory of the Republic. It included Venice and its lagoon which was divided into nine districts. Each district was governed by a patrician with the title of podestà and the district cities were: Caorle, Torcello, Murano, Malamocco, Chioggia, Loreo, Cavarzere and Gambarare, while the city of Grado was administered by a count.[86] Initially extending along the entire Venetian coast from Grado to Cavarzere, it progressively moved its southern border up to Goro, along the Po Delta; the extension on the mainland was limited to between 7 and 19 kilometers.[87]
- Stato da Màr
- The Domini del Mare, called Stato da Mar in the Venetian language, were made up of the overseas territories conquered by the Republic of Venice. The regiments of the Stato da Mar reported to the Provveditore Generale da Mar who lived on the island of Corfu. During their expansion, the Venetians established a series of dominions throughout the Eastern Mediterranean that went from Istria to Dalmatia, also including Albania and the Ionian Islands. Further east, the Republic conquered a large part of Greece, in particular the Cyclades, the Peloponnese and Negroponte, as well as the large islands of Crete and Cyprus.[88] In addition to the territories directly dominated by Venice, the Stato da Mar also included various feudal lordships governed by the major noble families of the time. These lordships corresponded to the various Aegean Islands, but were also established in Athens and Gallipoli.[89]
- Stato da Tera
- The Domini di Terraferma, called Stato da Tera in the Venetian language, were made up of the territories of northern Italy conquered by the Republic of Venice, where in the event of war the command of the armies was assumed by the Superintendent General of Arms. The mainland possessions were the territories of Padovano, Marca, Vicenza, Veronese, Bresciano, Bergamasco, Cremonese, Friuli, Polesine and Cadore.[90]
Armed forces and public security
Navy
The navy was the main armed force of the Republic for centuries, at least until the 15th century when it was also supported by a land army. The fleet was administered by the Magistrate of the Militia of the Sea, a sort of ministry composed of different magistracies that divided the tasks of governing the preparation of the fleet, weapons and crews. The preparation of the fleet was administered by the supervisors of the Venetian Arsenal, the key structure of the Venetian navy. In this extensive complex of workshops and shipyards, ships were built and armed. The Arsenal also contained several schools in which personnel were trained, also with the help of French and English workers, to make the construction of ships and vessels more efficient and of higher quality. The preparation of the fleet was decided by the armament supervisors who took care of the maintenance of the decommissioned ships and the assignment of the soldiers and rowers. The recruitment operations for sailors were instead carried out by the presidents of the Militia of the Sea, who following the War of Candia began to recruit personnel from abroad and not only from the territory of the Republic.[91]
The fleet located in the Stato da Màr was managed by the Superintendent General of the Sea, who resided in Corfu and in the overseas dominions was also head of the army and administration. In wartime, command passed to the Captain General of the Sea, who was immediately elected and who had more extensive powers than the Superintendent General.[92] The fleet was divided into a small army and a large army. The thin army was made up of galleys and galleasses and the admirals in command, all patricians, had different degrees of specialisation; for example there were those responsible for navigating rivers and lakes, those dedicated to the war against piracy and those dedicated to surveillance of the islands. The large army, made up of warships, was managed in wartime by the Commissioner in the Army and the command of the ships was assigned to naval officers who did not belong to the Veneto patricians. Until the end of the 16th century the large armada was also used for the defense of commercial ships.[88]
Army
In the 15th century, the expansion and conquest of the mainland made it necessary to resort to venture companies and mercenaries to be able to equip themselves with land forces. The organization of the troops and mercenaries was managed by a set of supervisors who were coordinated by the Inquisitors above the roles, presided over by the Sages of the Mainland, who were responsible for reporting and managing the troops and their equipment. In the 16th century, the Cernide were established, territorial militias managed by the Rector of the regiment and made up of around a hundred men dedicated to the defense of land and maritime possessions, where they took the name of "craine"; they were managed by Savio ai Ordini. In wartime, the armies were coordinated by the Captain General of the Mainland, usually an expert mercenary who was supported by the Superintendent General and who took orders from the Sage of Scripture or the Minister of War.[90][93]
Police
The order of the city of Venice was managed by a police force coordinated by the six Lords of the Night who had the power to arrest criminals both day and night. In addition to the Lords of the Night, the district leaders also patrolled the streets. However, the order was also managed by a various number of supervisors. Crimes such as rape and blasphemy were regulated by the perpetrators of blasphemy who also took care of the control of brothels, the pump supervisors instead controlled the excesses of the nobles while the magistrates controlled health and the healthiness of public places. The new Justice controlled fraud and the Censors controlled corruption among public offices.[94] For political and more internal matters, the Republic sometimes also resorted to the use of hit men and had a network of spies comparable to modern secret services.[95]
Symbols
Since the retrieval of Mark the Evangelist's body from Alexandria in 828 and its arrival in Venice, the lagoon state established a special relationship with its patron. This bond, caused by the particular importance of the relic and above all by the bond existing between the Saint and the Churches of north-eastern Italy which traced their origins to his preaching, led to the patron saint being considered as the guardian of the State's sovereignty, becoming its symbol. The republic thus came to be called the Republic of Saint Mark and its lands were frequently known as Terre di San Marco.
The winged lion, symbol of Mark the Evangelist, appeared on the Republic's flags, coats of arms and seals, while the Doges themselves were depicted kneeling at the coronation, in the act of receiving the gonfalon from the Saint.
"Long live Saint Mark!" was the Republic of Venice's battle cry, used until its dissolution in 1797 following Napoleon's Italian campaign, and in the reborn republic governed by Daniele Manin and Niccolò Tommaseo. The cry "San Marco!" is used by the military personnel of the Lagunari Regiment "Serenissima" in every official activity or ceremony, since today's lagoon soldiers of the Italian army have inherited the traditions of the "Fanti da Mar" of the Serenissima.
The only equestrian order of the Republic was the Order of Saint Mark or the Doge.
Society
Starting from the 13th century, Venetian society clearly distinguished two social classes:
- Patricians
- The Venetian aristocracy was a relatively open social category documented in the Libro d'Oro: the first were the direct descendants of the first tribunes and their magistrates, to which were added the families who actively and above all economically participated in the War of Chioggia, the War of Candia and the Morean War. In 1774, all noble houses of the Mainland Dominions were also added to the Libro d'Oro. The Libro d'Oro was managed by the Avogadoria de Comùn and contained the list of all the births and weddings of the patriciate.[96] The aristocracy was not only a class of privileged people, but also of professional servants of the State. They were all educated, the richest attending the University of Padua while the impoverished nobility were educated for free at the Giudecca.[97] To prevent the concentration of power in a few hands, ensure a certain turnover and allow the greatest number of aristocrats to have employment, all these positions were short-lived, often lasting only one year and were often poorly paid. Nobles were not allowed to have relations with foreigners, leave the borders of the Republic, ask for pardons or distribute money; the nobility maintained itself even after judicial accusations and betrayal of the homeland.[98]
- Citizens
- Venetian citizenship was of three types:[99]
- Original citizens: Natives of Venice or from Venetian families up to the third degree enjoyed full citizenship, excluding Jews. The original citizens were also allowed to assume public offices, being able to become chancellors, secretaries, lawyers and notaries. Furthermore, citizens joined together in scholae, religious or professional confraternities that provided mutual aid to all members and allowed rules to be set for the various professions that took place in Venice.[100]
- Citizens de intra: New arrivals, based on merit, were granted full citizenship and the guarantee of the State within the borders and were allowed to carry out some jobs within the city.
- Citizens de extra: This was also a full citizenship granted on merit which conferred the privilege to sail and trade as a Venetian citizen.
Jews
The earliest evidence of Jewish presence in Venice dates back to 932;[101] in the 12th century the community had around a thousand members and was established in Mestre rather than Giudecca as was previously believed. Every day the Jews left Mestre and went to Venice, in particular to the San Marco and Rialto districts where they were allowed to work; here they trafficked goods and granted money loans, while some carried out the medical profession. Usury work was necessary for the functioning of the city's business activities and therefore, although they did not have citizenship and were not allowed to live there or buy a house, Jews were admitted to the capital with permits that were renewed every five or ten years. With a decree dated 22 May 1298, a limit was placed on the interest rate on loans, which was set between 10% and 12% and at the same time a tax of 5% was imposed on commercial traffic.[102]
In 1385, a group of Jewish moneylenders were allowed to live in the lagoon for the first time.[103] On 25 September 1386 they requested and obtained the purchase of part of the land of the Monastery of San Nicolò al Lido to bury their deceased, creating the Jewish cemetery of Venice, which is still functioning today. Towards the end of the 14th century, restrictions on Jews increased and they were only allowed to stay in the city for two weeks; furthermore they were forced to wear a yellow circle as a distinctive sign, which in the 16th century transformed into a red cloth.[104]
After the defeat of Agnadello by the League of Cambrai, many Jews from Vicenza and Conegliano took refuge in the lagoon, making coexistence with the Christians difficult. Following social tensions, the Venetian Ghetto was established on 29 March 1516 where the foundries had previously stood and in 1541 it was expanded to make room for the Levantine Jews.[105][106] The work of the Jews was placed under the supervision of the magistrates in Cattaver, and in addition to managing the ghetto's pawnshops they were allowed to trade in second-hand goods, making the ghetto an important commercial center. The ghetto was divided into communities based on their country of origin, each with its own synagogue.[107]
After the plague the ghetto was repopulated by some Eastern European Jews and in 1633 the ghetto was expanded,[108] but in the meantime Venice had lost its centrality and the Jewish community also began to shrink; taxes towards it increased and sectarian movements began to arise. The situation declined until in 1737 the community declared bankruptcy.[109]
Publishing
Printing and other graphic arts constituted a thriving economic sector of the Republic and the main means of disseminating Venetian knowledge and discoveries in the technical, humanistic and scientific fields. The birth of Venetian publishing dates back to the 15th century, in particular to 18 September 1469 when, through the efforts of the German Johann of Speyer, the Venetian government passed the first law to protect publishers by granting a printing privilege which gave the publisher the exclusive right to print certain works.[110] In addition to the German community, the French community, led by Nicolas Jenson, also owned most of the Venetian printing presses towards the end of the 15th century.[111]
Between 1495 and 1515 Aldus Manutius further developed Venetian publishing via three innovations which later spread throughout Europe: the octavo format, the italic character and the hooked comma. These inventions allowed him to become the largest Venetian publisher and consequently attracted the major humanists of the time, including Pietro Bembo and Erasmus.[112] After Manutius, many other Italian entrepreneurs such as the Florentine Lucantonio Giunti opened printing presses in Venice, which towards the end of the 16th century reached 200 businesses, each with higher book circulations than the average for European cities. The large quantity of printing houses scattered throughout the Venetian territory made the city of Venice a leader in the sector, so much so that in the last twenty years of the 15th century one book in ten in Europe was printed in Venice.[111] Book production in Venice was encouraged not only by the rules in favor of publishers, but also by the lack of censorship; in the 16th century works prohibited in the rest of Europe such as the Lustful Sonnets were printed in Venice.[113]
Religion
Catholicism
The Republic of Venice recognized Catholicism as the state religion[114] and while remaining relatively tolerant compared to other confessions, there were many laws in favor of Catholic traditions given that according the 1770 census, approximately 86.5% of the population was Catholic.[115][116] The Catholic Church administered the territory of the Republic first with the Patriarchate of Grado which had the Diocese of Castello as its suffragen, which was then suppressed on 8 October 1451 by Pope Nicholas V to erect the Patriarchate of Venice which then also incorporated the dioceses of Jesolo, Torcello and Caorle. During the history of the Republic of Venice, the cathedral of the patriarchate was the Basilica of San Pietro di Castello which was changed to St Mark only in 1807, ten years after the fall of the Republic.[117] During the period of the Counter-Reformation, the Inquisition was also active in the Republic of Venice, which from 1542 to 1794 tried 3,620 defendants including Giordano Bruno, Pier Paolo Vergerio and Marco Antonio de Dominis. Crimes relating to faith, such as witchcraft, were regulated by a secular court as early as 1181 during the regency of Doge Orio Mastropiero. The tribunal, in addition to being made up of its judges appointed by the doge, also availed itself of the help of the bishops and the patriarch of Grado and the most widespread punishment for those convicted was that of being burned at the stake.[118] These magistrates continued to intervene as lay members even in the trials of the Inquisition, often coming into conflict with the Church and sometimes mitigating the harshness of the punishment.[119] Furthermore, the Inquisition only had power over Christians and not over members of other confessions such as Jews.[120] The government also regulated the construction of places of worship, limited bequests to the Church, favored by the presence of parish priests-notaries, and controlled priests who preached against the government, sometimes expelling them from the state.[121]
Other religions
In addition to the Catholic faith in the Republic of Venice, particularly in the Stato da Mar, the Orthodox church was also present; according to the 1770 census, the Orthodox Greeks constituted approximately 13.3% of the population.[116] The Greek Orthodox community was also present in the capital and in 1456 the Greeks obtained permission to build the church of San Biagio in Venice, the only church in the city where they could celebrate their rites. In 1514, due to overcrowding of San Biagio, the construction of the church of San Giorgio dei Greci was permitted.[122]
The remaining population belonged to other churches such as the Protestant and the Armenian Catholic churches and there were also Islamic merchants, who however did not reside permanently in Venice. The Armenians settled in Venice as early as the mid-13th century, although the construction of the first Armenian Catholic church, the church of Santa Croce degli Armeni, dates back only to 1682.[123] San Lazzaro degli Armeni also served as the Armenians' main cultural center.
The Protestant religion, which could be practiced freely, also spread in the Republic of Venice through commercial relations maintained with the Germans and the Swiss. In 1649 the Protestants obtained the possibility of burying their dead in the Church of San Bartolomeo and in 1657 they were allowed to celebrate masses with German shepherds in the Fondaco dei Tedeschi.[124]
In Venice there was also the Fondaco dei Turchi where the Ottoman merchants spent their time and in which there was a small mosque, the only place of prayer for the Muslim faithful who stayed in Venice.[125]
In 1770 there were only 5,026 Jews, equal to approximately 0.2% of the Republic of Venice's population,[116] but various laws were promulgated for this minority which limited their relationship with Catholics and their civil liberties. Following the expulsion of the Jews in almost all of Europe, the Jews of Venice were allowed to remain in the ghetto so as not to create disorder in the city and to be able to carry out their traditions and pray in the synagogues.[126] In Venice there were five synagogues belonging to the different Venetian Jewish communities, also called universities or nations, which held the liturgy here following different rites for each synagogue.[107]
Economy
Resources
Since the first settlements, fishing played a fundamental role in the livelihood of the lagoon communities. Fishing was one of the most widespread activities among the common people who also dedicated themselves to fish farming. After being caught, the fish was salted to improve preservation.[127] In addition to fishing, although to a lesser extent, hunting, fowling and pastoralism were widespread but were limited by the scarcity of pastures in the Dogado. Since pastures in the lagoon were limited, agriculture was instead widespread mainly with vegetable crops and some vineyards, the agricultural products of which were sold by fruit merchants.[128]
In addition to fishing, lagoon populations heavily relied on salt extraction for their livelihood. Owing to the salt trade, the first lagoon populations were able to purchase goods that the Venetian lagoon did not produce, primarily wheat. A direct competitor in the production of salt was Comacchio, which was destroyed in 932 and its population transferred to the Venetian lagoon. The areas of greatest production were the northern part of the lagoon and the district of Chioggia which over the centuries became the greatest salt producer in the Mediterranean, reaching its peak in the 13th century. Most of the salt produced in Chioggia was exported to Italy via the Po and the Adige. The salt pans were made up of a series of dams, basins and canals that allowed them to function correctly. Their extension was notable; the Chioggia salt pans occupied an area of approximately 30 km² which corresponded to ninety times the size of the city. The impetus for the foundations' construction was given by the Doge and the great ducal families who held the property. The estates of the nobles were rented to the families of the salt workers who independently maintained the salt pan and extracted the salt. The owners of the land had an exclusively economic relationship with the salt workers; consequently the nobles, owners of the land, could not consider themselves feudal lords as was the case in the rest of Europe in the cultivation of wheat. The salt workers also organized consortia which made noble imposition of the landowners even more difficult.[129] In the 14th century, during the height of commercial expansion, salt production in the lagoon had decreased. Regardless, Venice maintained a monopoly on this precious commodity by requiring merchants to transport a certain percentage of salt which was often purchased in Puglia, Sicily, Sardinia, the Balearic Islands, Cyprus and on the coast of Libya.[130]
Industry
Venetian glass, traded as early as the 9th century in the form of sheets, is still considered one of the leading products of the Venetian industry. Because of its quality, Venetian glass was used to make works of art exported all over the world.[131][132] Its production was located solely on the island of Murano to avoid the spread of fires within the capital.[133] Despite the glass production, the most successful activity was that of shipbuilding which took place within the state arsenal, active since the 12th century,[134] but also in the small Venetian shipyards of the city. Alongside the construction of ships, the production of naval cordage was developed by the filacànevi, who starting from the 13th century imported hemp from Russia via the Black Sea.[135] Among the activities already widespread in the 13th century were tanneries and wool spinning, which were exercised in Giudecca.[133]
Trade
From its early history, trade was the basis of the Republic of Venice's success and political rise: in 829, the Doge Giustiniano Participazio was involved not only in the management of his feudal assets but also in commercial affairs by sea.[131] The commercial enterprises of Venetian citizens increased in the 12th century, a period which saw the creation of the mude, caravans of merchant galleys which, escorted by armed ships, headed towards the eastern markets, starting with that of Constantinople.[31] Venice had a privileged relationship with the Byzantine Empire starting from 1082 when, with the issuing of the Golden Bull, Venetian merchants were allowed to exchange goods with the Byzantines without any tax and to establish an inhabited nucleus directly in the capital, a privilege which however ended violently in 1171 by the decree of Manuel I Komnenos.[136] Commercial traffic reached its peak in the 13th century, but continued to be fundamental in the political and social life of Venice until the end of the 16th century. This period saw the establishment of state-sanctioned mude, convoys of ships contracted to merchants which were used to reach faraway lands including India, China, England and Flanders. The Republic's trade was so extensive that in 1325 the existence of Venetian settlements was noted in northern European cities including Southampton and Bruges and in Asian cities such as Zaiton, Sudak, Azov, Trabzon, and Amman as well as other settlements on the shores of the Aral Sea.[137] Venetian trade suffered a sharp decline at the end of the 16th century when competition from the Portuguese, Spanish, English and Dutch became suffocating for Venetian merchants.[138]
The goods that the Venetians exchanged mostly by sea and which crowded the central Rialto market were: cotton, fabrics, iron, wood, alum, salt and spices exchanged as early as the 9th century; the testament of Bishop Orso Participazio, in which pepper is mentioned, dates back to 853.[131] In addition to pepper, Venice traded large quantities of cinnamon, cumin, coriander, cloves and many other spices which played a fundamental role in the preservation of meat, for the flavoring of wines and for medical treatments of which Venetian medicine made a large use. Spices also include sugar, produced in Cyprus and refined in Venice and all the perfumes and incenses widely used by Venetian patricians and during religious functions. In addition to spices, the East also supplied precious stones and silk, vice versa Venice brought European metals, wood, leather and fabrics to the East. Another good of which Venice held a monopoly was salt, which was shared wherever there was some, and given its usefulness the Republic obliged every merchant to transport a certain quantity. The salt monopoly, as well as being a commercial privilege, was also a political deterrent against foreign nations. Another commodity of fundamental importance was the cereals which were managed by the Wheat Chamber to combat possible famines. There was also a large import of oil used not only in seasoning but also for lighting.[137]
Coinage
The great expansion of Venetian trade began in the 12th century and the need for a stable currency became increasingly urgent. In 1202, during the dogate of Enrico Dandolo, the minting of the silver ducat (later called matapan) began, which quickly spread throughout the Mediterranean basin. The ducat corresponded to 26 denarii and weighed approximately two grams.[31][139] Like the other coins of the Republic of Venice, the ducat had the effigy of the reigning doge, who held the standard of Venice in front of Saint Mark.[140]
On 31 October 1284, Doge Giovanni Dandolo decided to mint a new currency, which would later be vital in the Venetian economy: the gold sequin, or ducat.[141] The sequin, made of excellent purity gold, weighed approximately 3.5 grams and its minting was interrupted only with the fall of the Republic.[142] Starting from the 16th century, minting took place in a special building overlooking the Marciano Pier, the Zecca of Venice, over whose activity the Council of Forty supervised.[140]
Culture
Art
The Venetian Renaissance was one of the fundamental declinations of the Italian Renaissance. Renaissance art arrived in Veneto through Donatello's stay in Padua from 1443 to 1453, later spreading to painting through Squarcione and his students. Shortly afterwards the new style also spread to Venice (traditionally linked to late Gothic culture) following Giovanni Bellini, after which Venetian art was revolutionized by Giorgione and – at the beginning of the sixteenth century – by Titian. This era ends with Veronese and Tintoretto, the latter dying in 1594, who marked the transition towards mannerism.
Theatre
Until the 17th century, theatrical works were performed in noble palaces or in public by the Compagnie della Calza who staged their works on mobile wooden theatres.[143] During the 17th century there was a great diffusion of the theater so much so that in 1637 Venice's first permanent theater, the Teatro San Cassiano, was inaugurated with a presentation of Andromeda by Benedetto Ferrari. Over the course of the century, thanks to the financing of the nobles, a dozen theaters were built in which tragedies and melodramas were mainly performed.[144] In Venice the reform of melodrama was initiated by Apostolo Zeno, who, inspired by French tragedy, made melodrama more sober and constructed his works so that they could be performed even without music.[145]
In the 17th century, although less widespread than melodramas, it represented commedia dell'arte. Based on the actors' improvisation and on canovaccio, it was characterized by a large number of stereotyped characters who generically represented the life of the various Venetian social classes.[146] In the 17th century, commedia dell'arte was completely reformed by Carlo Goldoni who introduced a new form of theater thanks to the elimination of masks and the introduction of a precise script. Conversely, Carlo Gozzi staged presentations of fairy tales, exalting and exasperating the tradition of commedia dell'arte.[147]
Fashion
Due to its commercial relationship with the East, the sumptuous clothing typical of the Byzantines soon spread in Venice, consisting mostly of embroidered or quilted blue tunics, the symbolic color of the Venetians. Among the common people, however, long canvas dresses decorated with colored stripes were widespread and the shoes were usually leather sandals. Over the cassock, men often wore large cloaks as well as belts and hats. The clothes of noblewomen were made of embroidered silk, very long and low-cut. They usually also wore trailing cloaks and furs from a large variety of animals, among which the ermine stood out. With the establishment of the guild in the 13th century, the art of tailors was also regulated and protected with the institution of dress tailors, ziponi tailors and sock tailors who dedicated themselves respectively to making clothes, fustian jackets and socks.[111]
With the beginning of the Renaissance following European fashion, the dresses of noblewomen became increasingly sumptuous, while men began to wear skirts combined with long two-tone stockings. Since the streets were not paved, they risked dirtying clothes, so very high clogs became widespread which were then removed once the home was reached. Between the 15th and 16th centuries the Baroque influence led to the excesses of noble clothing which in this era also began to be embellished with locally produced Burano lace.[148] To prevent the nobles and patricians from spending enormous amounts of money on clothing, in 1488 the Republic issued laws aimed at limiting the use of excessively expensive clothes, so much so that in 1514 pump supervisors were established who had the task of monitoring the amount of money spent on private parties, clothes and other luxury goods.[149]
In the 17th century the fashion for the wig and the use of face powder began and men's clothes progressively became bulkier. In the 18th century, the velada, a sort of large, richly decorated cloak, was introduced into men's clothing. Contrariwise, the vesta a cendà came into use among women's clothing, a modest dress which consisted of a long dress, usually black, and a white scarf. The poorer women, on the other hand, wore a round white dress that covered the head with a hood and was tied with a belt.[150]
Traditions
The Republic of Venice had numerous historical and folkloristic traditions of various kinds, some of which are still celebrated following its fall. In Venice, religious holidays were celebrated with extremely sumptuous processions directed towards St Mark's Basilica in which the Doge took part, preceded by the various government assemblies and the city's major schools. In addition to all the major Catholic holidays, the Feast of Saint Mark, which commemorates the city's patron saint, was also celebrated with equal pomp.[151] During the year, various masses were also held in memory of some fundamental events in the Republic's history, such as the failure of the Tiepolo conspiracy or that hatched by the Doge Marino Faliero and others such as the Festa delle Marie to celebrate the power of Venice.[152] One of the festivals of greatest political importance was the Festa della Sensa, celebrated on Ascension Day, which included a parade of boats led by the Bucentaur and the rite of the Marriage of the Sea which symbolized the maritime dominion of Venice.[153]
Among the profane festivals, one of the most important was the Carnival: celebrated for its entire duration, it included the major celebrations on Mardi Gras and Shrove Tuesday. In addition to dances and shows of various types, on the last Sunday of Carnival the bull hunt took place, an event similar to Spanish-style bullfighting. In addition to the Carnival, the Regatta was held, which like the other festivals included large celebrations and processions.[154]
See also
- Commune Veneciarum
- Francesco Apostoli (c. 1755–1816)
- History of the Byzantine Empire
- Italian Wars (1494–1559)
- List of historic states of Italy
- Ottoman wars in Europe
- Republic of San Marco (1848–49)
- Timeline of the Republic of Venice
- Venetian Albania
- Venetian Carnival
- Venetian Dalmatia
- Venetian Gothic architecture
- Venetian Ionian Islands
- Venetian nationalism
- Venetian navy
- Venetian nobility
- Venetian Renaissance architecture
- Venetian School (art)
- Venetian School (music)
- Venetian Slovenia
- Wars in Lombardy (1425–54)
Notes
- ^ Italian: Repubblica di Venezia or Repubblica Veneta; Template:Lang-vec or Repùblega Vèneta.
- ^ Short for Serenissima Repubblica di Venezia; Template:Lang-en; Template:Lang-vec.
References
- ^ "VENEZIA E LA LINGUA UFFICIALE DELLO STATO VENETO". VENEZIA E LA LINGUA UFFICIALE DELLO STATO VENETO. Archived from the original on 2 November 2022. Retrieved 2 November 2022.
- ^ Francesca Forzan (29 May 2021). "Venezia 1600: un dialetto e una lingua" (in Italian). Università di Padova. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 26 December 2022.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 348.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 356.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 368.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 381.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 376.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 79.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 74.
- ^ Romanin 1853, p. 354.
- ^ a b Romanin 1854, p. 408.
- ^ Romanin 1855, pp. 423–428.
- ^ Romanin 1858, pp. 569–573.
- ^ Romanin 1858, p. 605.
- ^ Romanin 1859, p. 408.
- ^ Romanin 1859, p. 430.
- ^ Romanin 1859, p. 492.
- ^ Romanin 1855, p. 544.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 24–26.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 27–31.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 34.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 37–38.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 40–44.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 46–48.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 51–53.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 53–55.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 62–64.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 65–67.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 71–73.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 82–83.
- ^ a b c Zorzi 2001, pp. 91–93.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 117–118.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 80–81.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 102–103.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 110–111.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 114–115.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 120.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 128–132.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 138–140.
- ^ a b c Zorzi 2001, pp. 142–144.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 147–149.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 153.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 172–173.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 199–205.
- ^ Norwich 1982, p. 269.
- ^ Witzenrath, Christoph (November 2015). Eurasian Slavery, Ransom and Abolition in World History, 1200–1860 (New ed.). Ashgate. p. 13. ISBN 978-1472410580. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2015.
- ^ Engel, Pál (2001). The realm of St. Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. New York: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1-8504-3977-6.
- ^ Mallett, M. E.; Hale, J. R. (1984). The Military Organisation of a Renaissance State, Venice c. 1400 to 1617. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-03247-4.
- ^ Manousakas, Manousos I. (1960). Ἡ ἐν Κρήτῃ συνωμοσία τοῦ Σήφη Βλαστοῦ (1453–1454) καὶ ἡ νέα συνωμοτικὴ κίνησις τοῦ 1460–1462 [The Conspiracy of Sēphēs Vlastos in Crete (1453–1454) and the New Conspiratorial Attempt of 1460–1462] (PhD thesis). Athens: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Archived from the original on 30 September 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
- ^ a b c Norwich 1982, p. 494.
- ^ Turnbull, Stephen (2003). The Ottoman Empire 1326–1699. Routledge. p. 58. ISBN 978-0-415-96913-0.
- ^ Melisseides Ioannes A. (2010). "E epibiose:odoiporiko se chronus meta ten Alose tes Basileusas (1453–1605 peripou)", (in Greek), epim.Pulcheria Sabolea-Melisseide, Ekd.Vergina, Athens (WorldCat, Regesta Imperii, etc.), pp. 91–108, ISBN 9608280079
- ^ De Vries, Jan. "Europe in an age of crisis 1600–1750". Cambridge University Press. p. 26. Archived from the original on 3 September 2018. Retrieved 2 September 2018.
- ^ The Jesuits and Italian Universities, 1548–1773. Catholic University of America Press. 2017. p. 151. ISBN 978-0813229362. Archived from the original on 2 October 2022. Retrieved 5 January 2022.
- ^ Zorzi, Alvise (1983). Venice: The Golden Age, 697–1797. New York: Abbeville Press. p. 255. ISBN 0896594068. Archived from the original on 19 March 2021. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
- ^ Norwich 1982, p. 591.
- ^ Norwich 1982, p. 615.
- ^ Trousson, Raymond (2012). Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Tallandier. p. 452. ISBN 9782847348743.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 322–326.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 15–16.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 326–327.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, p. 102.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 327–330.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 16–17.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 330–331.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, p. 21.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, p. 117.
- ^ a b Da Mosto 1937, p. 213.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 22–23.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 331–333.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 30–32.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 333–334.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 34–38.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 334–335.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 63–64.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 336–337.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 68–69.
- ^ Da Mosto 1937, pp. 52–61.
- ^ Berengo, Marino. "Ravenna in età Veneziana" (PDF) (in Italian). pp. 1–2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 300.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 343.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 89.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 87.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 78.
- ^ Da Mosto 1940, pp. 3–4.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 196–197.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 127.
- ^ a b Da Mosto 1940, p. 5.
- ^ Da Mosto 1940, pp. 21–22.
- ^ a b Da Mosto 1940, p. 6.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 369–371.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 371–372.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 372–373.
- ^ Romanin 1859, pp. 357–360.
- ^ Preto 2004, p. 344.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 223–224.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 8–9.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 278–279.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 105–106.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 364–365.
- ^ "Storia – Le origini: Gli ebrei a Venezia". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 29 November 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ Cappelletti 1853, pp. 120–123.
- ^ "Storia – La prima condotta". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 28 November 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ Cappelletti 1853, pp. 123–132.
- ^ "Storia – La nascita del Ghetto – I Tedeschi". JVenice. Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ "Storia – Levantini e Ponentini". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ a b "Storia – La Natione italiana". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ "Storia – La peste e la ripresa del Ghetto". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ "Storia – Dalla crisi economica al messianesimo di Sabbatai Zevi". JVenice (in Italian). Jewish Community of Venice. Archived from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 22 January 2020.
- ^ "Privilegio di stampa". Treccani (in Italian). Istituto della Enciclopedia Italianafondata da Giovanni Treccani S.p.A. Retrieved 3 April 2024.
- ^ a b c Ciriacono 1996.
- ^ "Aldo Manuzio – Note biografiche". Archived from the original on 10 August 2017. Retrieved 11 February 2020.
- ^ Magno 2012, pp. 2–3.
- ^ Gordon, Scott (2009). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. p. 149. ISBN 9780674037830.
Venice was the most cosmopolitan city in Europe in the sixteenth century, but its many churches were almost entirely Christian and Catholic, and Catholicism was the official religion of the republic.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, p. 7.
- ^ a b c Castiglioni 1862, p. 301.
- ^ "Storia del Patriarcato – Patriarcato di Venezia" (in Italian). Patriarcato de Venezia. Archived from the original on 9 February 2019. Retrieved 7 February 2019.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 14–16.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, p. 279.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, p. 34.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 85–90.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 459–461.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 489–493.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 474–475.
- ^ Sagredo & Berchet 1860, pp. 68.
- ^ Cecchetti 1874, pp. 478–487.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 60.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 74–75.
- ^ Hocquet, Jean-Claude (1992). "Eta Ducale – Le risorse: le saline". Treccani. Archived from the original on 19 September 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2020.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 160–161.
- ^ a b c Zorzi 2001, pp. 35–36.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 282.
- ^ a b Zorzi 2001, p. 121.
- ^ "Storia dell'Arsenale". Città di Venezia. 19 March 2020. Archived from the original on 14 June 2020. Retrieved 19 March 2020.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 122.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 66.
- ^ a b Zorzi 2001, pp. 158–163.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, pp. 366–367.
- ^ "Grozzo Enrico Dandolo". LaMoneta. Archived from the original on 17 February 2019. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
- ^ a b "Venezia". LaMoneta. Archived from the original on 17 February 2019. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
- ^ Zorzi 2001, p. 164.
- ^ "Ducato". LaMoneta. Archived from the original on 17 February 2019. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, pp. 381–382.
- ^ Romanin 1858, p. 548.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 51–52.
- ^ Romanin 1858, p. 551.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 54–55.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 71.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 322.
- ^ Mutinelli 1851, p. 3.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 25–29.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 30–32.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 36–40.
- ^ Romanin 1860, pp. 44–45.
Bibliography
Primary sources
- Contarini, Gasparo (1599). The Commonwealth and Government of Venice. Lewes Lewkenor, translator. London: "Imprinted by I. Windet for E. Mattes". The most important contemporary account of Venice's governance during the time of its blossoming; numerous reprint editions; online facsimile.
Secondary sources
- Benvenuti, Gino (1989). Le repubbliche marinare. Rome: Newton Compton.
- Brown, Patricia Fortini (2004). Private Lives in Renaissance Venice: art, architecture, and the family.
- Cappelletti, Giuseppe (1853). Stabilimento nazionale di G. Antonelli editore (ed.). Storia della Repubblica di Venezia dal suo principio sino al suo fine. Vol. 10. Venezia.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Castiglioni, Pietro (1862). Stamperia reale (ed.). Relazione generale sopra i censimenti delle popolazioni italiane. Torino.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Cecchetti, Bartolomeo (1874). Stabilimento tipografico di P. Naratovich (ed.). La Republica di Venezia e la corte di Roma. Vol. 1. Venice.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Chambers, D. S. (1970). The Imperial Age of Venice, 1380–1580. London: Thames & Hudson. The best brief introduction in English, still completely reliable.
- Ciriacono, Salvatore (1996). "Industria e artigianato" (in Italian). Archived from the original on 4 September 2023. Retrieved 14 October 2023.
- Da Mosto, Andrea (1937). Biblioteca d'Arte editrice (ed.). L'Archivio di Stato di Venezia, indice generale, storico, descrittivo ed analitico (PDF) (in Italian). Vol. 1. Rome. Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 February 2020. Retrieved 8 February 2019.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Da Mosto, Andrea (1940). Biblioteca d'Arte editrice (ed.). L'Archivio di Stato di Venezia, indice generale, storico, descrittivo ed analitico (PDF) (in Italian). Vol. 2. Rome. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 12 February 2020.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Drechsler, Wolfgang (2002). Venice Misappropriated. Trames 6(2):192–201. A scathing review of Martin & Romano 2000; also a good summary on the most recent economic and political thought on Venice.
- Garrett, Martin (2006). Venice: a Cultural History. Revised edition of Venice: a Cultural and Literary Companion (2001).
- Grubb, James S. (1986). When Myths Lose Power: Four Decades of Venetian Historiography. Journal of Modern History 58, pp. 43–94. The classic "muckraking" essay on the myths of Venice.
- Hanlon, Gregory (1997). The Twilight of a Military Tradition: Italian Aristocrats And European Conflicts, 1560–1800. Routledge.
- Howard, Deborah, and Sarah Quill (2004). The Architectural History of Venice.
- Hale, John Rigby (1974). Renaissance Venice. ISBN 0-571-10429-0.
- Karpov, Serghei (2017). Ortalli, Gherardo; Sopracasa, Alessio (eds.). "La Tana veneziana. Vita economica e rapportisociali: i tentativi di superare la grande crisi della metà del Trecento". Rapporti Mediterranei, Pratiche Documentarie, Presenze Veneziane: Le Reti Economiche e Culturali (XIV – XVI Secolo). Estratto (in Italian). Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti: 237–252. ISBN 978-88-95996-69-1.
- Lane, Frederic Chapin (1973). Venice: Maritime Republic. ISBN 0-8018-1445-6. A standard scholarly history with an emphasis on economic, political and diplomatic history.
- Laven, Mary (2002). Virgins of Venice: Enclosed Lives and Broken Vows in the Renaissance Convent. The most important study of the life of Renaissance nuns, with much on aristocratic family networks and the life of women more generally.
- Magno, Alessandro Marzo (2012). Garzanti Libri (ed.). L'alba dei libri: Quando Venezia ha fatto leggere il mondo. Milano. ISBN 9788811133872.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Martin, John Jeffries and Dennis Romano (eds.) (2002). Venice Reconsidered: The History and Civilization of an Italian City-State, 1297–1797. Johns Hopkins UP. The most recent collection on essays, many by prominent scholars, on Venice.
- Melisseides Ioannes A. (2010), E epibiose:odoiporiko se chronus meta ten Alose tes Basileusas (1453–1605 peripu), (in Greek), epim.Pulcheria Sabolea-Melisseide, Ekd.Vergina Athens, (WorldCat, Greek National Bibliography 9217/10, Regesta Imperii, etc.), p. 91–108, ISBN 9608280079
- Muir, Edward (1981). Civic Ritual in Renaissance Venice. Princeton UP. The classic of Venetian cultural studies, highly sophisticated.
- Mutinelli, Fabio (1851). Lessico veneto (in Italian). Venezia: Giambattista Andreola.
- Norwich, John Julius (1982). A History of Venice. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
- Prelli, Alberto (2012). Sotto le bandiere di San Marco, le armate della Serenissima nel '600, Itinera Progetti, Bassano del Grappa
- Preto, Paolo (2004). il Saggiatore (ed.). I servizi segreti di Venezia (in Italian). Milan. ISBN 978-885650164-3.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Romanin, Samuele (1853). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 1. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Romanin, Samuele (1854). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 2. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Romanin, Samuele (1855). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 3. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Romanin, Samuele (1858). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 7. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Romanin, Samuele (1859). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 8. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Romanin, Samuele (1860). Storia documentata di Venezia (in Italian). Vol. 9. Venice: Pietro Naratovich.
- Rosand, David (2001). Myths of Venice: The Figuration of a State. How foreign writers have understood Venice and its art.
- Sagredo, Agostino; Berchet, Federico (1860). Stabilimento di Giuseppe Civelli (ed.). Il Fondaco dei Turchi in Venezia. Milan.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - Tafuri, Manfredo (1995). Venice and the Renaissance. On Venetian architecture.
- Tafel, Gottlieb Lukas Friedrich, and Georg Martin Thomas (1856). Urkunden zur älteren Handels- und Staatsgeschichte der Republik Venedig Archived 29 March 2017 at the Wayback Machine.
- Tomaz, Luigi (2007). Il confine d'Italia in Istria e Dalmazia. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. Conselve: Think ADV.
- Tomaz, Luigi. In Adriatico nel secondo millennio. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri.
- Tomaz, Luigi (2001). In Adriatico nell'antichità e nell'alto medioevo. Foreword by Arnaldo Mauri. Conselve: Think ADV.
- Van Tricht, Filip (2011). The Latin Renovatio of Byzantium: The Empire of Constantinople (1204–1228). Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-20323-5.
- Zorzi, Alvise (2001). La Repubblica del Leone. Storia di Venezia. Milan: Bompiani. ISBN 978-88-452-9136-4.
External links
- Venetian Republic at Encyclopædia Britannica
- Story of Venice at Treccani, historiographical collection of the Republic of Venice (in Italian)
- 1st millennium in Italy
- 7th-century establishments in Europe
- 7th-century establishments in Italy
- 1797 disestablishments in Italy
- 1797 disestablishments in the Republic of Venice
- Christian states
- Former republics
- History of the Adriatic Sea
- History of the Mediterranean
- History of the Balkans
- History of Venice
- Italian city-states
- Italian states
- Maritime republics
- Republic of Venice
- States and territories disestablished in 1797
- States and territories established in 697