Talk:Reservation in India: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Latest revision as of 14:18, 8 September 2024

Reservation in India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Reservation in India. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Reservation in India at the Reference desk.

India: Politics Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in November 2012.

Indian caste system Top‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indian caste system, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Caste system in India, DBA experiences, narratives and movements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indian caste systemWikipedia:WikiProject Indian caste systemTemplate:WikiProject Indian caste systemIndian caste system articles

Top

This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

WikiProject Indian caste system to do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Citing sources : Poona Pact needs secondary sources
Collaborate : Media and caste to look like Media and gender
Expand : Annihilation of Caste

Law High‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Social Work High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Work, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Social Work on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Social WorkWikipedia:WikiProject Social WorkTemplate:WikiProject Social WorkSocial work articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discrimination High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Education High‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2019 and 5 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mobeenb98. Peer reviewers: Dinakmehta, Na.annamalai.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

latest advances in reservation syastem

the section in which you have shown the advances in reservation system of india . there must have some more changes took place after 1995 so i need to know that

The information which you have mentioned under title “Beneficiary groups of the reservation system” may miss guide the reader.

Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at Mills College supported by WikiProject Politics and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{Skip to talk}}
-{{User:MiszaBot/config
-|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
-|maxarchivesize = 70K
-|counter = 2
-|minthreadsleft = 4
-|minthreadstoarchive = 1
-|algo = old(30d)
-|archive = Talk:Reservation in India/Archive %(counter)d
-}}
 {{ArticleHistory
 |action1=GAN
@@ Line 17: / Line 9: @@
 |topic=politics
 }}
-{{Skip to talk}}
+{{User:MiszaBot/config
-{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
+|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
-{{WikiProject India|class=C|importance=top|assess-date=November 2012|politics=yes|politics-importance=top|needs-infobox=yes}}
+|maxarchivesize = 70K
-{{WikiProject Business|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|counter = 2
-{{WikiProject Discrimination|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|minthreadsleft = 4
-{{WikiProject Education|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|minthreadstoarchive = 1
-{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|algo = old(30d)
-{{WikiProject Sociology|class=C|importance=Low}}
+|archive = Talk:Reservation in India/Archive %(counter)d
 }}
-{{ WAP assignment | course = Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Politics of Developing Nations (Martha Johnson) | university = Mills College | term = 2011 Q3 | project = WikiProject Politics }}
 {{Notaforum}}
+{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|collapsed=y|
+{{WikiProject India|importance=top|assess-date=November 2012|politics=yes|politics-importance=top|needs-infobox=yes}}
+{{WikiProject Indian caste system|importance=Top}}
+{{WikiProject Law|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Business|importance=Low}}
+{{WikiProject Social Work|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Discrimination|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Education|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Politics|importance=High}}
+{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=High}}
+}}
 {{archives}}
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UC_Berkeley/India_(Global_Studies_121)_(Fall_2019) | assignments = [[User:Mobeenb98|Mobeenb98]] | reviewers = [[User:Dinakmehta|Dinakmehta]], [[User:Na.annamalai|Na.annamalai]] | start_date = 2019-08-29 | end_date = 2019-12-05 }}
+==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
+[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-08-29">29 August 2019</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2019-12-05">5 December 2019</span>. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UC_Berkeley/India_(Global_Studies_121)_(Fall_2019)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:Mobeenb98|Mobeenb98]]. Peer reviewers: [[User:Dinakmehta|Dinakmehta]], [[User:Na.annamalai|Na.annamalai]].
+{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 08:04, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}}
 == latest advances in reservation syastem ==
@@ Line 39: / Line 46: @@
 Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.
+== Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment ==
-== Protected edit status ==
+[[File:Wikipedia-Ambassador-Program-Logo.png|50px]] This article is the subject of an [[WP:Student assignments|educational assignment]] at Mills College supported by [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics|WikiProject Politics]] and the [[Wikipedia:Ambassadors|Wikipedia Ambassador Program]]&#32;during the 2011 Q3 term. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:United States Education Program/Courses/Politics of Developing Nations (Martha Johnson)|on the course page]].
+[[Category:Wikipedia Ambassador Program student projects, 2011 Q3{{!}}{{PAGENAME}}]]
-Seriously, why has no one done this yet? With a topic like Reservation there are bound to be idiots trying to promote their agendas on Wikipedia about how reservation is either the greatest thing to happen to India or lamenting the "plight of the General category student" denied their rightful place or how the rich sc/sts take all the benefits. [[User:C1MM|C1MM]] ([[User talk:C1MM|talk]]) 15:39, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
-== Additions to the lead section by [[User:JusticeCM]] ==
-The following text added to the lead section by [[User:JusticeCM]] in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reservation_in_India&type=revision&diff=952176060&oldid=951937167 these] edits has been removed:
-:*{{tq|It is observed that even after 70 years of reservation the backward classes haven't been benefitted the way they should have been and reservation keeps getting extended after every 10 years.[2] One of the major reasons for this is no income cap on ST/SC reservations unlike OBC and EWS reservations where there is an income cap so that once a person is benefitted by reservation and is capable of earning a livelihood, he is no longer entitled to reservation. As there is no concept of creamy layer in ST/SC reservations, even the son, grandson and great grand son of any other class A officer gets the benefits of reservation who himself got reservation.[3] So the benefits get siphoned off by the effluent ST/SC's and are not able to percolate to the lower strata. Even the supreme court has directed the central government to introduce creamy layer concept in ST/SC reservation, but this is not possible because of vote bank politics.[4] So reservation is necessary in a country like India but rules for availing it should be changed for the overall development of people of backward classes.[5]}}
-for the reasons mentioned below:
-:*{{tq|It is observed that even after 70 years of reservation the backward classes haven't been benefitted the way they should have been and reservation keeps getting extended after every 10 years.[2] One of the major reasons for this is no income cap on ST/SC reservations unlike OBC and EWS reservations where there is an income cap so that once a person is benefitted by reservation and is capable of earning a livelihood, he is no longer entitled to reservation.}} — [[WP:Original Research]]
-:*{{tq|As there is no concept of creamy layer in ST/SC reservations, even the son, grandson and great grand son of any other class A officer gets the benefits of reservation who himself got reservation.[3]}} — Adequately covered by {{tq|However, no income criteria has been set for members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.}}
-:*{{tq|So the benefits get siphoned off by the effluent ST/SC's and are not able to percolate to the lower strata.}} — [[WP:Original Research]]
-:*{{tq|Even the supreme court has directed the central government to introduce creamy layer concept in ST/SC reservation, but this is not possible because of vote bank politics.[4]}} — The given citation doesn't say that the Supreme Court gave the claimed directive.
-:*{{tq|So reservation is necessary in a country like India but rules for availing it should be changed for the overall development of people of backward classes.[5]}} — Reads like essay and personal opinion.
-The following text was modified:
-:*{{tq|Today anyone whose forefathers belonged to ST/SC community gets the benefits of reservation irrespective of his socioeconomic status.[1]}} to {{tq|However, no income criteria has been set for members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.}} --[[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]] ([[User talk:Skr15081997|talk]]) 13:42, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
+{{small|The above message was substituted from {{tlc|WAP assignment}} by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) on 16:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)}}
-* [[User:JusticeCM]], it's high time that you familiarise yourself with [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]]. The text you are repeatedly adding to the article is clearly biased against the topic and the citations you are including in your additions don't support the claims you are adding to the article. I had explained earlier to you above, why your additions were reverted. The language you are using in the article isn't what would ideally be used in an encyclopedia. For example, you are repeatedly adding the line {{tq|As there is no concept of creamy layer in ST/SC reservations, even the son, grandson and great grand son of any other class A officer gets the benefits of reservation who himself got reservation}}. The "creamy layer" thing has been adequately summed up as {{tq|However, no income criteria has been set for members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.}} You are constantly, in your edit summaries, asking other editors to {{tq|Provide citations to contradict whatever has been written and dont engage in an unnecessary edit war. Provide evidence that a son of IAS/IPS or any other class A officer cannot avail reservation and if you do then i wont edit it further.}} That's not exactly how things are done here. You are expected to provide citations to the text you are adding to the article, which has to be neutral in tone. What you are doing is providing citations for part of your text and based on them adding your own interpretation of the subject. The text you are continuously adding to the article is original research as explained above and doesn't deserve place in the article, let alone the lead section. Please go through the [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]], [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]] and [[Wikipedia:No original research]] policies. --[[User:Skr15081997|Skr15081997]] ([[User talk:Skr15081997|talk]]) 13:50, 6 May 2020 (UTC)