Talk:Charles Hepburn Scott: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
ACrockford (talk | contribs) →Speedy deletion tag - issues will be addressed soon!: - article revised; remove nom? |
ACrockford (talk | contribs) →Contested deletion: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This article was created at an event yesterday, and there appears to have been a misunderstanding about the source content being used. Working on it but please hold off on deletion for now! Thanks :) [[User:Lirazelf|Lirazelf]] ([[User talk:Lirazelf|talk]]) 09:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC) |
This article was created at an event yesterday, and there appears to have been a misunderstanding about the source content being used. Working on it but please hold off on deletion for now! Thanks :) [[User:Lirazelf|Lirazelf]] ([[User talk:Lirazelf|talk]]) 09:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Crow}} this page has now been revised significantly and should no longer represent a copyright violation. Request that the nomination for speedy deletion be removed. [[User:ACrockford|ACrockford]] ([[User talk:ACrockford|talk]]) 10:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Crow}} this page has now been revised significantly and should no longer represent a copyright violation. Request that the nomination for speedy deletion be removed. [[User:ACrockford|ACrockford]] ([[User talk:ACrockford|talk]]) 10:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
== Contested deletion == |
|||
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it has been sufficiently revised and re-written, with new information added from resources --[[User:ACrockford|ACrockford]] ([[User talk:ACrockford|talk]]) 10:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:30, 19 September 2015
Speedy deletion tag - issues will be addressed soon!
This article was created at an event yesterday, and there appears to have been a misunderstanding about the source content being used. Working on it but please hold off on deletion for now! Thanks :) Lirazelf (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- @Crow: this page has now been revised significantly and should no longer represent a copyright violation. Request that the nomination for speedy deletion be removed. ACrockford (talk) 10:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it has been sufficiently revised and re-written, with new information added from resources --ACrockford (talk) 10:30, 19 September 2015 (UTC)