User talk:Timtrent: Difference between revisions
→Draft: Sevants of Christ the King: Replying to Jacantha (using reply-link) |
|||
Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
: |
: |
||
:The references must pass the criteria outlined in [[WP:42]]. If they do that, and there is a sufficient variety of sources (three or more) then the draft will stand a very good chance of acceptance [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 12:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
:The references must pass the criteria outlined in [[WP:42]]. If they do that, and there is a sufficient variety of sources (three or more) then the draft will stand a very good chance of acceptance [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 12:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
||
Thank you[[User:Jacantha|Jacantha]] ([[User talk:Jacantha|talk]]) 13:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:03, 18 February 2021
Start a new discussion thread |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
In the event that what you seek is not here then it is archived (0.9 probability). While you are welcome to potter through the archives the meaning of life is not there.
Draft: Servants of Christ the King
Dear Timtrent, just wanted to thank you for the encouragement re probable notability. Am continuing to work on, Many thanks Jacantha (talk) 19:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Jacantha, while online references are not essential, if you can find online versions of the print works you are using as references this will aid the next reviewer. I find the topic baffling, but the entity does appear to meet our criteria. So I want you to have the best chance possible of having it accepted Fiddle Faddle 20:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Timtrent, this is my last try to make this article better i have tried many times to make this article better and to meet the acting notability but i couldn't. If you can then please help me to improve references until it gets reviewed. I don't know from where and how should I collect references that would meet the acting notability.Thanks, Jenifree 14:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Jenifree, Since neither you nor I can find any then we must conclude that there are none. She fails WP:NACTOR Fiddle Faddle 14:37, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Draft: Sevants of Christ the King
Very much appreciating your further comment - the answer to this may be obvious, but not to a beginner !
please may I ask as I would like this to get through and don't want to hinder. Unfortunately there is no online copy for 'An Adventure in Discipleship' which I quote from and as it is still in copyright that won't be straightforward to achieve. Brian Bridge's book Treasury of Blessings is available as a free download, which I have added for now. But it is not a secondary source. Do you think it will more help or hinder. Before I submit again. Jacantha (talk) 12:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Jacantha, As long as you can give full details of the book/document - See {{Cite book}} for example - then this will be absolutely fine. I am make no comment as a reviewer of the draft itself, just about the technical usage of a non-online work.
- The references must pass the criteria outlined in WP:42. If they do that, and there is a sufficient variety of sources (three or more) then the draft will stand a very good chance of acceptance Fiddle Faddle 12:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Thank youJacantha (talk) 13:03, 18 February 2021 (UTC)