Jump to content

User talk:Orthacanthus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AKIRA explosions: new section
Line 5: Line 5:


If you indeed are not Ring Cinema, I trust that you will be willing to let the [[Wikipedia:CheckUser]] process proceed so that we can sort all of this out. Thanks for understanding. Cheers, [[User:CCS81|CCS81]] ([[User talk:CCS81|talk]]) 04:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
If you indeed are not Ring Cinema, I trust that you will be willing to let the [[Wikipedia:CheckUser]] process proceed so that we can sort all of this out. Thanks for understanding. Cheers, [[User:CCS81|CCS81]] ([[User talk:CCS81|talk]]) 04:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

:If anyone's curious and stumbles across this bit on my Wiki talk, the tl;dr is that this guy really, really wanted me banned for editing one of their precious pages, even after providing proof. The investigation cleared me. [[User:Orthacanthus|Orthacanthus]] ([[User talk:Orthacanthus#top|talk]]) 22:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)


== Orthacanthus, you are invited to the Teahouse! ==
== Orthacanthus, you are invited to the Teahouse! ==

Revision as of 22:33, 16 August 2022

Sockpuppet report

Hi Orthacanthus. As you seem to know, I opened an investigation of sock puppetry regarding your anonymous IP edits as they might connect to the banned user Ring Cinema. As you also seem to know, this string of edits between 8:15 1 August and 12:23 2 August included your reversion six times over the span of four hours. This behavior, and its location in the No Country For Old Men (film) plot section, is very similar to that exhibited by Ring Cinema.

You have stated that you are a different editor than Ring Cinema. For some perspective, Ring Cinema was temporarily or permanently blocked from editing 12 times over the course of four years for his or her disruptive editing. The user particularly struggled greatly to express himself or herself. His or her inability to edit constructively and insistence on maintaining poorly worded and opaque copy, coupled with many and endless inarticulate ad hominem attacks on talk pages, caused his or her many disruptive and counterproductive behaviors in violation of Wikipedia policy. So as you might imagine, there is much concern that these violations don't resume.

If you indeed are not Ring Cinema, I trust that you will be willing to let the Wikipedia:CheckUser process proceed so that we can sort all of this out. Thanks for understanding. Cheers, CCS81 (talk) 04:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If anyone's curious and stumbles across this bit on my Wiki talk, the tl;dr is that this guy really, really wanted me banned for editing one of their precious pages, even after providing proof. The investigation cleared me. Orthacanthus (talk) 22:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orthacanthus, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo

Hi Orthacanthus! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

AKIRA explosions

Sorry, where is it described as an explosion exactly? Vranak (talk) 15:52, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]