User talk:Belbury: Difference between revisions

Hey! Hello. You say: <<Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. I have reverted your edit.>>

So, why don't you check this?

I rechecked it all 5 days in a row. And I myself corrected every word in this formulation. Do you have any criticism of my wording or remarks on the topic? 95.25.77.155 (talk) 14:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning label

@Belbury

Good idea moving the warning labels into a table. Thank you for your contribution! Are you interested in adding 3 example images, one for each label? eximo (talk) 18:19, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PaladinOfDaedalus: No opinion, really! If you've got some images in mind and want help in adding them, though, let me know. Belbury (talk) 18:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Music of Dance Dance Revolution for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Music of Dance Dance Revolution is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Music of Dance Dance Revolution until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Loyalmoonie (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental reversion

Apologies, didn't notice that the version I was working off on Hannah Schmitz‎ left out the primary sources tag you had added. Not sure why I didn't see an edit conflict warning. Thanks for putting it back. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sirfurboy: All good, I've missed some edit conflicts myself lately! Belbury (talk) 14:58, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop reverting my edits on Sinapali 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're restoring edits by blocked user User:Iptesh Kumar Meher. If that's your account, you need to log in and request an unblock. Belbury (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's my account . Stop reverting! 2A0A:EF40:E11:A701:24E0:98E:952E:EE38 (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not your account. But stop it. Belbury (talk) 10:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've added your talk page to the p-block list of the IP range. Favonian (talk) 11:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Belbury (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To address about wikipage edit

Hii , Belbury

I need to talk about the wikiproject we are assigned under that me and 4 more people including Dhanya Suthar (whose edit you removed ) ,would add some "false awakening" related paragraphs from articles published in pubmed about it which might include protoconsciousness theory , and actually Dhanya forgot to add about reference to his paragraph but please it is a humble request that don't remove those edit , we will surely add citations and references accordingly , but this wikipage is pre decided to edit , and if you don't allow our topics to be displayed it might lead to unwanted consequences for future , so please don't delete those edits , we would edit appropriately, nothing will be wrong which we would add so please co-operate. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 11:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Rathod Dharmarajsinh: Hi Rathod. Is this a student project?

The warning template your friend received says if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so, so they can just do that. Belbury (talk) 11:05, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah it is medical students related project.

Thanks for the reply. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for supporting us

You marked FA's wikipage under education that is so good , thank you for that. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 02:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About FA wikipage

Hii Belbury

Dhruv my groupmate added about hypothesis and with reference then why did you remove it? He is last to edit in our project then we can submit our project and I will add some final touch in it to confirm that wikipedia policies are not violated so please before removing it add a msg to me so I can edit any inappropriate mistake by Dhruv. Rathod Dharmarajsinh (talk) 06:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Where is Kate? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 12:22, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About my images that have been deleted from World Trade Center wiki page

Hi,

I saw how you reverted my contribute to the gallery on the WTC 1973-2001 page. Thank you for telling me the images are copyright but I just want to say I got around 10 images from NIST releases, which says "Public domain mark 1.0".

I can agree that I did upload some images found from elsewhere, which are probably copyright. But is it okay if I add the NIST images since they are not copyright.

-Varenimo Varenimo (talk) 22:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Varenimo: Thanks for the clarification! From a look at the NIST website I'm not sure it's true to say that every photo in their collection is public domain, but I'll raise a deletion discussion on Commons about it. Belbury (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the response!

Where can I find the deletion discussion? I am new so I don't know how to travel around this site.

Some of my photos that I uploaded were not deleted, mostly my NIST uploads were not deleted. Can I upload the photos that are okay onto the WTC wikipedia? Varenimo (talk) 12:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should have had a notification over at Commons. The NIST discussion is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Varenimo - please do correct me if I've misunderstood the nature of the archive.org subset!

Unless there's some urgency to having the photos in the article immediately, I'd wait to see how the NIST discussion goes before adding the photos back. Belbury (talk) 12:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Its been almost a month and I see there has not been anything on the discussion. I want to add the photos but I know your better at this stuff so I want to hear your opinion. Varenimo (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons deletion discussions can take a long time to resolve, sadly!

It might help if you posted something to the discussion saying why you believe the images are all public domain. Other users and admins could be waiting to see your point of view before getting involved. Belbury (talk) 11:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removed my photo

I saw you removed my skiing photo. I guess I'm not photo-worthy for the Wikipedia article about ski goggles and helmet 🤣

Maybe my next goal should be to become a professional skier, so I look more professional on camera! Félix An (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All a matter of composition rather than subject! But best of luck with the skiing career. Belbury (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny somali

I received your message about Johnny Somali and your removal of an edit on his wiki page, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a "neutral point of view."

Johnny Somali is known for spreading false information without substantial evidence. The claim of him being a "Somali child pirate" lacks credible support and appears to be part of his persona as an online celebrity and troll.

It's essential to provide accurate and honest information to prevent readers from believing such unfounded claims about his background. Bluenosezulu (talk) 19:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article says Ismael says that he was a Somali child soldier, which is not inaccurate.

If he's known for lying about his past to the point where reliable sources have written about that, please do add that to the article. Without that context, Wikipedia shouldn't take its own view on a person's statements by describing him as "claiming" things rather than "saying" them. Belbury (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply, will definitely amend it in accordance of what you said :) Bluenosezulu (talk) 19:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me..

I made this image and I can do and post whatever I want with it, the DeviantArt post is from MY account..

Thank you! RUI Thomas Fan (talk) 20:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RUI Thomas Fan: Hi, I don't know which of your deleted uploads you're referring to, but you can post to Commons:Undeletion requests if you think something was removed in error. Belbury (talk) 06:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Michael Myers (Halloween)

Michael Myers (Halloween) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 05:39, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Info

hi, you reverted the "Everyone Knows That" wiki page due to "the sources don't appear strong enough yet to rewrite the article with the film source as fact" I can in fact confirm that everyone knows that IS in that movie at 1:07:30. Brandon44401 (talk) 21:26, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orpington & District Amateur Boxing Club

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Orpington_%26_District_Amateur_Boxing_Club&oldid=1223646399

Draft page

Please add citations and help get ready to post. Box32 (talk) 13:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Box32: You should add all the newspaper sources that you were using for reference when you wrote the article, it doesn't seem like a great use of my time to track down those same sources from scratch. Belbury (talk) 14:04, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added all the papers from archives, is the page now ready for the main site ? Can you help please ? Box32 (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Orpington_%26_District_Amateur_Boxing_Club

this is now the updated draft , is this ok ? Box32 (talk) 14:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it got feedback from a reviewer when you submitted the draft. Best of luck with it. Belbury (talk) 17:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question about changing positions of sections

hi. I have a question. Can users change position of a section on a Wikipedia article. Thanks Donteatgarlic (talk) 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Donteatgarlic Sure! There are some strict rules for where sections like "See also" and "External links" should go (you can see the list at MOS:SECTIONORDER), and certain types of article like biographies might have guidelines for what order to list things like personal life and career and discography sections, but otherwise it's largely up to editors.

Be WP:BOLD and make a change if you think it improves an article. If somebody disagrees, they'll tell you why! Belbury (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.how do users change positions of sections? Donteatgarlic (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Donteatgarlic Just click the edit link at the top of the page, and cut and paste the section into whichever place you want it. Headings are marked with equals signs around them ==Like this== Belbury (talk) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the help Donteatgarlic (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My edit

@Belbury

Why did you undo my edits? Was there an issue? 2A0A:EF40:E81:7701:1061:3825:F5D5:2BE6 (talk) 10:53, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg rebellions

User LuxembourgLover has removed the AI-flag from the article Luxembourg rebellions. I do not know enough about AI to make any useful comments about that. But I know the way LuxembourgLover messed up texts and misinterpreted sources to be extremely cautious. Can you check if the removal of the flag is correct? The Banner talk 22:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same happened here: History of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The Banner talk 22:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I just wanted to let both of you know that I used AI to assist with spelling and grammar when working on those articles. I first created a rough draft and then used ChatGPT with sources to help me fix the grammar and spelling. The AI took my draft and combined the sources I provided, in the case of the Luxembourg article, some newspaper articles, and created the updated information that I then added to Wikipedia. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:28, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Including the incorrect source??? The Banner talk 00:32, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What source was incorrect? LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The correction here. The Banner talk 19:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“The political future of Luxembourg” from the Times covers the singing of Marseillaise and the members of the committee. LuxembourgLover (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: The thing to check is whether the AI-assisted text introduced any false information, and I don't know enough about the subjects to judge that. But it would be better for a second editor to review and remove these templates, rather than LuxembourgLover reviewing and approving their own flagged work - especially if you have concerns that either the editor or AI has misinterpreted some of the sources. Belbury (talk) 08:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial intelligence art

Not only did you remove the link but you removed the edit. You have a Wiki page about AI art that doesn't have a single mention of AI art generators, which is needed to create AI art. It's like having a page about video games and not ever mentioning the consoles needed to play them. I added the link because there isn't a Wiki page for the term AI art generators. Escapecapsule (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Escapecapsule: No strong view on the meaning behind it, I was reverting the addition of a blog link around a particular keyphrase, and a sentence which didn't flow into the next one. Feel free to expand the section while drawing from reliable sources. --Belbury (talk) 16:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Colin The Caterpillar

Dear Sir/Madam, I understand your reasoning for removing my addition, however, the gentleman I refer to is my grandfather and I have documentation to prove that he named and created Colin the Caterpillar.

He held many senior positions within the food manufacturing industry, including one where he presided over the creation and the naming of Colin the Caterpillar cake in order to gain a contract with M&S for their cake production. I would be grateful for some advice on how to ensure this remains as this is very important to me that my grandfather is recognised for his part in Colin the Caterpillar.

Kind regards,

Nicholas Washington-Hadley Nickwashingtonhadley (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tone on Nick Simmons (politician)

I restored your recent maintenance tag (tone) on Nick Simmons (politician) [1]. It had been removed without explanation or any sign of addressing the issue. When I read the article, though, I couldn't quite see what the concern was. A couple words like "tapped" and "stint", I saw as maybe somewhat informal. If you let me know more specifically what you thought needed improvement, I can take a crack at editing it. Cheers. _signed,Willondon (talk) 16:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Willondon: Thanks, it was mostly vibes-based from a skim of the text, which just felt a bit too much like campaign literature. Going back with a pen I'd also underline "born and raised" and the repeated use of his first name "Nick". Belbury (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK. It did seem a little campaigny to me, but I didn't see any outright hyperbole. I'll make some edits later on today and remove the tag. I won't object if you still think there are concerns and want to put the tag back. _signed,Willondon (talk) 17:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Willondon: I guess lines like Nick worked to implement policies including the investment of hundreds of millions of dollars into growing the state’s economy, improving Connecticut’s infrastructure and schools, training thousands of workers to fill open jobs, and transitioning to a clean energy future feel a little weaselly for being ongoing work on aspirations (is Connecticut in a clean energy future yet?) rather than a list of measured achievements. And these should really be coming from somewhere better than a press release from his boss. In fact, most of those claims aren't even in the source, which I've now flagged up.

I'll keep the article on my watchlist and take another look at it after you've edited, at some point. Belbury (talk) 17:30, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done with it now. Thanks. _signed,Willondon (talk) 20:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decentraland stats

Hello Mr. Belbury I've made some corrections with the market reviews because I'm Doing digital and physical network marketing and I've claimed this data from internet on the basis of my research and I've provided some data sources also. If you are unable to understand my sources pls can you contact me or leave me your contact no. or social media handle. Like : Instagram, Twitter, Discord, Whatsapp. Or if you don't want to contact pls recorrect my data I've Provided. Pls Sir, I know that wrong information can destroy a men. But trust me it is not the wrong data sir. Okk Sir. Pls let it done Sagarswamimfev (talk) 08:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sagarswamimfev: Take a look at WP:PRIMARY, you should be using secondary sources here, in the way that the rest of the article is. --Belbury (talk) 08:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of Mice and Men - ==In popular culture==

Hey @Belbury, well let's start compiling all of the times the book was mentioned in popular culture, instead of just deleting the section the moment someone tries to begin one. Ridiculopathy (talk) 13:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ridiculopathy: Such a list of all the times the book was mentioned was split out to Of Mice and Men in popular culture a long time ago, and that page was deleted in 2022. You could try a Wikipedia:Deletion review if you think there's a reason to overturn the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of Mice and Men in popular culture (2nd nomination). Belbury (talk) 13:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't know that. I'm not that invested in the idea, I just thought it would be nice. Obviously if there are thousands of references it's untenable. Thanks for the info. Ridiculopathy (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SAT

Thank you for the correction. I did not realize I pressed the wrong button. Cheers! Nerd271 (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why you removed my edits

Today on the 7th of June 2024, you removed my edit to the union correctional institution, I would like to know why. 92.207.184.242 (talk) 08:32, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I personally understand the mugshot edit, Maybe a little too much info but, for the prison, I'm a little confused 92.207.184.242 (talk) 08:33, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LISTPEOPLE, the person is not the subject of a Wikipedia article. Belbury (talk) 08:34, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And? Info on people should put down there. Plus on the prison there were about 10 inmates in the notable section with no page, Mike Bargo was already on that page, so I just wanted to re add him. DOn't see the big deal. 92.207.184.242 (talk) 08:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It looks to me that every other person in the list is the subject of a full article, either a biography or an article about their crime. Belbury (talk) 08:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

God almighty, you can't just let it go can you? Who cares you can't read about them on one of the most unreliable sources! Just google it!

I'm sorry that I'm angry but this is the 6th time something so damn stiupid has been removed from wikipedia. 92.207.184.242 (talk) 08:47, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But nonethrless I will leave it now. 92.207.184.242 (talk) 08:48, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nirmal Purja

Hello! Purja replied to allegations on Instagram. The sources removed by you contain screen shots from his Instagram. What other sources would you suggest? I think Ohthatpaul writes an unneutral statement about Purja. Please help me to write an acceptable part about Purja's response to allegations. Regards Szelma W (talk) 10:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Szelma W: It needs a reliable secondary source covering it, and I'm not sure the cited climbing blogs count as that.

Even if this is a genuine screenshot and the post can be verified on Instagram (which it looks like it can't, was it a 24-hour story post that expired?), we couldn't quote it under WP:SOCIALMEDIA since Purja makes claims about third parties. Belbury (talk) 10:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Is Outside a reliable source? Here is the link to the Outside article with most of the Purja's Instagram statement at the end of the article: https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/everest/climbers-weigh-in-on-nims-purja-following-sexual-abuse-allegations/ Regards Szelma W (talk) 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore my reply above. Regards Szelma W (talk) 18:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Misinformation Edits

I suspect you are from Reddit and have an issue with the company, hence the edits of reinstating fake news. This article was personally rebuked by the very person that the article is about. Anyway, hopefully people can at least see the edit history and realize it is untrue. 2607:FEA8:BAD7:4700:C52B:5FAD:695B:8D90 (talk) 11:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IP, is it even important where a company is based? Why do you want to hide it's based in Moscow so bad? LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 11:12, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring reports

Hi Belbury. In the future, please report edit warring to WP:ANEW rather than WP:AIV. AIV is only for obvious vandalism and obvious spam. Removal of maintenance templates by an editor of the article is clearly a disagreement over the template's inclusion rather than vandalism as the term is used on Wikipedia. Thanks. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 19:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, will do. Belbury (talk) 07:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See

See he's doing it again 12.2.244.202 (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 266: / Line 266: @@
 :Sure, will do. [[User:Belbury|Belbury]] ([[User talk:Belbury#top|talk]]) 07:08, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
+== See ==
+See he's doing it again [[Special:Contributions/12.2.244.202|12.2.244.202]] ([[User talk:12.2.244.202|talk]]) 14:37, 17 June 2024 (UTC)