User talk:LunaEclipse/Archive 2: Difference between revisions
LunaEclipse (talk | contribs) →Requested GOCE copy edit of Billy Mitchell (gamer): archived using OneClickArchiver) |
LunaEclipse (talk | contribs) →GA nominations: archived using OneClickArchiver) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
{{GOCEtb|article=Billy Mitchell (gamer)|sign=[[User:Dhtwiki|Dhtwiki]] ([[User talk:Dhtwiki|talk]]) 09:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)}} |
{{GOCEtb|article=Billy Mitchell (gamer)|sign=[[User:Dhtwiki|Dhtwiki]] ([[User talk:Dhtwiki|talk]]) 09:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC)}} |
||
{{Clear}} |
|||
== GA nominations == |
|||
Hello. Just an FYI, per [[WP:GANI]], you're only supposed to be nominating articles for GA status of you're a significant contributor to the article. [https://xtools.wmcloud.org/topedits/en.wikipedia.org/LunaEclipse/0/Billy%20Mitchell%20%28gamer%29 This] probably wouldn't qualify - you didn't write hardly any of the article. Just making sure you understood this, as I noticed that [[Talk:Akai MPC|I'm not the first person to express concern about your nominations.]] Thanks. [[User:Sergecross73|<span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span>]] [[User talk:Sergecross73|<span style="color:teal">msg me</span>]] 01:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:26, 20 July 2024
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
Quick question
I already have an article nominated for GA (not reviewed), can I also nominate it for WP:PR? I'm trying to get Tyla to FA Thank you in advance. dxneo (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Dxneo, as far as I know, you can't have a PR and GAN open at the same time, so the answer is no. — lunaeclipse (talk) (contribs) 14:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you. dxneo (talk) 16:23, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Music Sounds Better with You
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Music Sounds Better with You you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reppop -- Reppop (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Music Sounds Better with You
The article Music Sounds Better with You you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Music Sounds Better with You for comments about the article, and Talk:Music Sounds Better with You/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reppop -- Reppop (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Requested GOCE copy edit of Billy Mitchell (gamer)
Hello, LunaEclipse. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Billy Mitchell (gamer) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Dhtwiki (talk) 09:33, 13 June 2024 (UTC) |
GA nominations
Hello. Just an FYI, per WP:GANI, you're only supposed to be nominating articles for GA status of you're a significant contributor to the article. This probably wouldn't qualify - you didn't write hardly any of the article. Just making sure you understood this, as I noticed that I'm not the first person to express concern about your nominations. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 01:45, 17 June 2024 (UTC)