User talk:NBAonNBC: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:43, 2 August 2007

Welcome

Hello, NBAonNBC, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement:

Again, welcome! —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb 02:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tecmobowl

You've undertaken a significant task, as he would sometimes delete all of it and sometimes only part of it. Good luck! :) Baseball Bugs 23:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you're going back to the primordial days of Tecmobowl, as it were. You'll get to see how early the rancor started. If it were me, instead of archive1, I would start with archive001, since they could add up. :) P.S. The lettering on this message looks weird. I don't know what's up with that. Baseball Bugs 00:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much better now. It was treating the whole thing as a superscript somehow. If you're up to Epeefleche, you're moving right along. "...blankings by that idiot"? Hmmm... Another way to put it is "...by that blankety-blank." :) Baseball Bugs 00:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're up to Sarah Goldberg, you should be in the home stretch. Baseball Bugs 00:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Archive1" is such a mundane title. Given the epic nature of those rants, along with him being an Atlantan and having been banished, a better title would be "Gone With the Wind". Baseball Bugs 00:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nicely done. It's interesting that he was on there for about 2 months before anything got posted to his talk page... and the first thing was a behavioral warning, in September 2006, about 8 months before the real hostilities began in May of 2007. The warning signs were there, but it can take a long time for the wheels of wikipedia justice to turn. But once they turn, they turn. Baseball Bugs 01:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NBAonNBC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What? I am not Tecmobowl, I engaged in a polite conversation with Baseball Bugs about Tecmobowl. I swear to God that I am not Tecmobowl or Long levi, please unblock me because this is presumptious. I am truly being honest, I did something good and you banned me for it. Please, undo the ban because of this honest mistake— NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your contributions have been mostly to Techmobowl's talk archives, including inserting live unblock requests. Highly suspicious and certainly disruptive. — Vassyana 01:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NBAonNBC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But, I was doing that to show all of his talk page notices. I am sorry if I hurt anything, but I am deadly serious when I say that I swear I am not Tecmobowl. I just put that intact, perhaps I should've removed the notices. So I'm sorry if I made anything suspicious, but please look at the swear. That is the honest to goodness truth. I am not lying. And I'm sorry for the disruptions this may have caused— NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=But, I was doing that to show all of his talk page notices. I am sorry if I hurt anything, but I am deadly serious when I say that '''I swear I am not Tecmobowl'''. I just put that intact, perhaps I should've removed the notices. So I'm sorry if I made anything suspicious, but please look at the swear. That is the honest to goodness truth. I am not lying. And I'm sorry for the disruptions this may have caused— NBAonNBC [[User:NBAonNBC|NBAonNBC]] 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=But, I was doing that to show all of his talk page notices. I am sorry if I hurt anything, but I am deadly serious when I say that '''I swear I am not Tecmobowl'''. I just put that intact, perhaps I should've removed the notices. So I'm sorry if I made anything suspicious, but please look at the swear. That is the honest to goodness truth. I am not lying. And I'm sorry for the disruptions this may have caused— NBAonNBC [[User:NBAonNBC|NBAonNBC]] 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=But, I was doing that to show all of his talk page notices. I am sorry if I hurt anything, but I am deadly serious when I say that '''I swear I am not Tecmobowl'''. I just put that intact, perhaps I should've removed the notices. So I'm sorry if I made anything suspicious, but please look at the swear. That is the honest to goodness truth. I am not lying. And I'm sorry for the disruptions this may have caused— NBAonNBC [[User:NBAonNBC|NBAonNBC]] 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Maybe I'm crazy but I'm a bit inclined to accept the unblock request. Yes it was odd behavior but not a single person complained so how disruptive could it be? Did I miss a checkuser request somewhere? —Wknight94 (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock. All I did was clean up his talk page deletions. Baseball Bugs complimented me for it. There was no checkuser. Thanks for understanding. But, once more, I swear I am not TecmobowlNBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What will a checkuser show? I have to admit you seem too experienced to not be a sock of someone - but I'm not convinced it's Tecmobowl. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tecmobowl was a very disruptive person. I am so happy he has yet to try again since his Long levi attempt. And, I admit, a checkuser will not prove anything. Tecmobowl as based out of Atlanta, I'm based out of Tampa NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why were you making those edits? Where were you copying the content from? How do you know so much about the situation? Vassyana 01:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen the discussion. I've read it all. And I decided to wade out the deletions to make an enhanced, uninterrupted guide to Tecmobowl's entire history. NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 01:40, 2 August 2007 edit Vassyana (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 15,130 edits →[[User:Tecmobowl]]: questions ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:43, 2 August 2007 edit undo NBAonNBC (talk \| contribs) 158 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 30:		Line 30:

	::::Why were you making those edits? Where were you copying the content from? How do you know so much about the situation? [[User:Vassyana\|Vassyana]] 01:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)		::::Why were you making those edits? Where were you copying the content from? How do you know so much about the situation? [[User:Vassyana\|Vassyana]] 01:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

			:::::I've seen the discussion. I've read it all. And I decided to wade out the deletions to make an enhanced, uninterrupted guide to Tecmobowl's entire history. NBAonNBC [[User:NBAonNBC\|NBAonNBC]] 01:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)