User talk:NBAonNBC

Welcome

Hello, NBAonNBC, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• The Simplified Ruleset
• How to edit a page
• Listing of other help pages

Again, welcome! —MrSomeone ( tlk • cntrb 02:11, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Tecmobowl

You've undertaken a significant task, as he would sometimes delete all of it and sometimes only part of it. Good luck! :) Baseball Bugs 23:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Wow, you're going back to the primordial days of Tecmobowl, as it were. You'll get to see how early the rancor started. If it were me, instead of archive1, I would start with archive001, since they could add up. :) P.S. The lettering on this message looks weird. I don't know what's up with that. Baseball Bugs 00:25, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Much better now. It was treating the whole thing as a superscript somehow. If you're up to Epeefleche, you're moving right along. "...blankings by that idiot"? Hmmm... Another way to put it is "...by that blankety-blank." :) Baseball Bugs 00:29, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

If you're up to Sarah Goldberg, you should be in the home stretch. Baseball Bugs 00:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

"Archive1" is such a mundane title. Given the epic nature of those rants, along with him being an Atlantan and having been banished, a better title would be "Gone With the Wind". Baseball Bugs 00:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Nicely done. It's interesting that he was on there for about 2 months before anything got posted to his talk page... and the first thing was a behavioral warning, in September 2006, about 8 months before the real hostilities began in May of 2007. The warning signs were there, but it can take a long time for the wheels of wikipedia justice to turn. But once they turn, they turn. Baseball Bugs 01:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NBAonNBC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What? I am not Tecmobowl, I engaged in a polite conversation with Baseball Bugs about Tecmobowl. I swear to God that I am not Tecmobowl or Long levi, please unblock me because this is presumptious. I am truly being honest, I did something good and you banned me for it. Please, undo the ban because of this honest mistake— NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your contributions have been mostly to Techmobowl's talk archives, including inserting live unblock requests. Highly suspicious and certainly disruptive. — Vassyana 01:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NBAonNBC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

But, I was doing that to show all of his talk page notices. I am sorry if I hurt anything, but I am deadly serious when I say that I swear I am not Tecmobowl. I just put that intact, perhaps I should've removed the notices. So I'm sorry if I made anything suspicious, but please look at the swear. That is the honest to goodness truth. I am not lying. And I'm sorry for the disruptions this may have caused— NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC) (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is a sock of Sarah Goldberg (talk · contribs) or Tecmobowl (talk · contribs) or someone. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Maybe I'm crazy but I'm a bit inclined to accept the unblock request. Yes it was odd behavior but not a single person complained so how disruptive could it be? Did I miss a checkuser request somewhere? —Wknight94 (talk) 01:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Please unblock. All I did was clean up his talk page deletions. Baseball Bugs complimented me for it. There was no checkuser. Thanks for understanding. But, once more, I swear I am not TecmobowlNBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:33, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

What will a checkuser show? I have to admit you seem too experienced to not be a sock of someone - but I'm not convinced it's Tecmobowl. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:35, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Tecmobowl was a very disruptive person. I am so happy he has yet to try again since his Long levi attempt. And, I admit, a checkuser will not prove anything. Tecmobowl as based out of Atlanta, I'm based out of Tampa NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:38, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Why were you making those edits? Where were you copying the content from? How do you know so much about the situation? Vassyana 01:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

I've seen the discussion. I've read it all. And I decided to wade out the deletions to make an enhanced, uninterrupted guide to Tecmobowl's entire history. NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Please explain this edit. Who e-mailed you and why did they e-mail you when you had barely contributed on Wikipedia? What other accounts have you used here? —Wknight94 (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Sarah Goldberg e-mailed m. Goldberg is a companion of mine, but she recently cancelled her e-mail (cloneinchitown@hotmail.com), meaning it's hard to access. Mine is NBAonNBCrocked@hotmail.com NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, discuss this tonight because I'm going to sleep. I'm tired today. Just remember the swear I put up there. I am religious, Christian, and I would not swear about something that is a lie. I may lie, but not if I swear, and I sweared about my innocence NBAonNBC NBAonNBC 01:58, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

(outdent) Sarah Goldberg (talk · contribs) is an indefinitely blocked user who vigorously defended Techmobowl (talk · contribs).[1] [2] [3] If NBAonNBC isn't a sockpuppet, s/he is a meatpuppet, which is treated all the same. Vassyana 02:08, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

(Edit conflict) Well now I think this is actually a sock of Sarah Goldberg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and A. Shakespeare (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Tampa, Christian, Tecmobowl involvement, etc. Whether Tecmobowl or Sarah Goldberg (or both), I'd say keep this blocked. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Great minds think alike, Vassyana. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

NO! I am serious I am not Sarah Goldberg or A. Shakespeare. Please do not keep me blocked. I am not a sock of anyone. I swear I am not Sarah Goldberg, or A.Shakespeare, or Tecmobowl. Please, assume good faith. NBAonNBC 02:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

You being Tecmobowl did not sit right with me but you being Sarah Goldberg fits perfectly. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

But I am not Sarah Goldberg. And besides, thats a username block. Either way, I am not her, I am an honest user who has edited sporadically since May. Seriously, I tried to improve something and now I'm a suspected sock. Assume good faith and do not take me as a sock NBAonNBC 02:16, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

It's a username block but you are still using multiple accounts in a disruptive fashion. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Stop assuming bad faith. I am not abusing sock puppets because I'm not a sock puppet. This block should be lifted due to being unfair and presumptious. Please, I beg you. NBAonNBC 02:24, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

"Assume good faith"? "Username block"? "Ban"? Tecmobowl? Sorry but you have far more experience here than your contributions indicate. You're a sock of someone and if you're not willing to say who, then you're being disruptive and will stay blocked if I have anything to say about it. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:34, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Ok, I am a sock of FoxSportsRadio. I, again, swear upon that. Sarah Goldberg and I edited some of the same articles, and we had a couple discussions, and decided to spread this to e-mail. Goldberg recently stopped using the e-mail. Again, my emial is NBAonNBCrocked@hotmail.com. Contact me there for more info. I hope this is good enough for you, as I am truly not a disruptive editor. Please, I beg you to unblock me NBAonNBC 02:40, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Go ahead and post a message here with the FoxSportsRadio account and maybe I'll reconsider. —Wknight94 (talk) 02:44, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Well, see her. My sock master NBAonNBC 02:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)