User talk:Zasdcxz~enwiki

Welcome!

Hello, Zasdcxz~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Wilhelm Gustloff (ship)

Please remember to post text in English. This is the English Wikipedia. Your edit to this article inserted a section in Russian about Alexander Marinesko, which should not be in a page about a ship. Also, please don't alter numbers without providing a source so other people can check where the information came from. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

• The edit you put in here isn't in correct English and appears to come partly from the Russian text you entered earlier. What URL did that text come from? - Mgm|^(talk) 08:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Фонд Литвиненко

A tag has been placed on Фонд Литвиненко, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. MarkSutton 21:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Block

I have blocked you for repeatedly making unnecessary POV forks of articles.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

BLOCK UNFAIR

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zasdcxz~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

No reason given to argue for unblock. — ²¹⁰physicq (c) 22:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should put a reason why you want an unblock. An unblock request without any reason will get the unblock request declined. Amos Han ^Talk 21:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

BLOCK UNFAIR

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zasdcxz~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Political motivated block. Not write how long is block why EXEXTLY I am block, The preside of deblocking is to complex , becouse I am new Zasdcxz 09:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No, the block was not "politically motivated". You were blocked for being disruptive. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that presents information for all points of views as long as long as they are properly supported by 3rd party sources. If you disagree with an article, you're meant to work with other editors to achieve consensus instead of persistently forking off your own personal version of an article nor do you tamper with comments of other editors on talk pages. You will not be unblocked unless you agree to work with others. --  Netsnipe  ►  19:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am not an administrator, so you should discuss with User:Ryulong about it; he is the one that blocked you. Not me. Amos Han ^Talk 18:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

UNBLOCK REQUEST

Dear Sirs!I am agree work with other. Not understand how long I am block . Zasdcxz 10:39, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

block unfear /84.9.151.125/block by Ryulong

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zasdcxz~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dea Sirs! This is 100 Prozent political motivated block Check this one, please. I am new. Sorry for my mistakes. Sorry for my bad English-I study English.What is POV? Thank you PS: Dear Mr Ryulong, you must be open you talk site for discussion, please. Thank you Zasdcxz 11:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Disruptive edits only, no understanding of cooperative editing. See second chance section below. — Sandstein 12:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Sirs! What is POV? Thank youZasdcxz 11:04, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

See WP:NPOV; WP:POVFORK. Sandstein 12:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Your second chance

Your request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas.
• Click View source on that article.
• Copy and paste the contents of that page at the bottom of your talk page under a new top-level heading (like this: = Article title =)
• Propose some significant and well researched improvements to your article by editing your personal copy of the article.
• When are you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked and placed on probation.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Sandstein 12:01, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

UNBLOCK REQUEST

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zasdcxz~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear Sirs!I am agree work with other. Not understand how long I am block . Zasdcxz Zasdcxz 12:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Dear Sirs!I am agree work with other. Not understand how long I am block . Zasdcxz [[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 12:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Sirs!I am agree work with other. Not understand how long I am block . Zasdcxz [[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 12:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Sirs!I am agree work with other. Not understand how long I am block . Zasdcxz [[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 12:48, 26 July 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Help

{{helpme}}can i edit the artical in another lang. as contribution my work

You should be able to edit the Russian wikipedia. It also uses a seperate system of user accounts, so you should be able to create a new account there as well. Your account in the English wikipedia is blocked indefinitely, sorry. Hoof Hearted 13:11, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Help Can I edit article in another lang.

{{helpme}}Can I edit article in another lang.

Yes. (Edit conflict, see above) Hoof Hearted 13:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

work contribution, some mistake

Dear Sirs! In art.[Larisa Arap}-some mistake. The name of first doctor, contakt with Mrs L.Arap-Olga Reshet

5 июля Лариса поехала в Североморск, чтобы взять справки. За месяц до этого она прошла полностью медицинскую комиссию, переоформляя водительские права. Зайдя в кабинет психиатра, и назвав свою фамилию, она удивилась бурной реакции Ольги Решет - принимавшего доктора, которая спросила: "Вы та самая, которая написала статью о психбольнице?" Лариса подтвердила, что это так.[1] [2]

[3] Доктор попросил ее выйти из кабинета и немного подождать. Ничего не подозревающая женщина вышла и села в коридоре. Тем временем врач вызвала наряд милиции и бригаду скорой помощи. Врач-психиатр спросил Арап: «А, вы та женщина, которая писала эту статью в газете?» Арап ответила: «Да». — «Подождите за дверью». В тот же момент врач вызвал «скорую помощь» и милицию

Marina Reckesh- name of doctor -psychiatrist in hospital ,THAT CHECK MRS ARAP AFTER HOSPITALISATION

Can you put this name in art. Thank you :) --Zasdcxz 17:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, Zasdcxz. You have indicated the mistake there, I just have corrected it. dima 20:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

UNBLOCK REQUEST

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zasdcxz~enwiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

1-Some work with art. Larisa Arap / art. has big publics attention / 2-some work in russ. sector Wikipedia-check, please. 3-Agree work in teem with neutral point of view. PS: sorry for my bad English Thank you:) --Zasdcxz 18:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= 1-Some work with art. '''Larisa Arap''' / art. has big publics attention / 2-some work in russ. sector Wikipedia-check, please. 3-Agree work in teem with neutral point of view. PS: sorry for my bad English Thank you:) --[[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 18:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= 1-Some work with art. '''Larisa Arap''' / art. has big publics attention / 2-some work in russ. sector Wikipedia-check, please. 3-Agree work in teem with neutral point of view. PS: sorry for my bad English Thank you:) --[[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 18:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= 1-Some work with art. '''Larisa Arap''' / art. has big publics attention / 2-some work in russ. sector Wikipedia-check, please. 3-Agree work in teem with neutral point of view. PS: sorry for my bad English Thank you:) --[[User:Zasdcxz|Zasdcxz]] 18:01, 17 August 2007 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Contribution work

Dear Sirs! Can you put in art Larisa Arap this ihf. Thank you:-) --84.9.148.135 20:24, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

==Другие преценденты в последнее время== Надо отметить сложности, например, во время экспертизы Юрия Буданова . Диагноз Pro и Contra менялся , в прессе отмечалась тенденциозностъ назначения экспертов - не исключена политическая подоплёка в этом случае.[4]. В английской части Wikipedia всё это отображено гoраздо шире. [Yuri Budanov], [Elza Kungaeva] Сотрудники психоневрологического диспансера Читинской области признали, что диагноз"шизофрения", поставленный 57-летнему пенсионеру МВД Анатолию Загибалову, был ошибочным. Юристы "Забайкальского правозащитного центра" провели собственное расследование этой истории и установили, что в признании экс-милиционера ненормальным были заинтересованы правоохранительные органы: прокуратура и суд Карымского района Читинской области.Анатолий Загибалов более трех лет пытается разобраться в гибели своего сына Евгения летом 2004 года, а силовые структуры стараются это дело "замять". Судебная коллегия по уголовным делам Московского городского суда 13 августа оставила в силе приговор психиатру Дмитрию Мухину за незаконное помещения граждан в психиатрический стационар, говорится в сообщении "Центра общественной информации". Мухин приговорен к 4 годам заключения.

Other recently covering

Indeed the complexity of, for example, during the examination [Budanov case | Yury Budanov]. Diagnosis Pro and Contra changed, in the press was nomination, it is political realities in this case. [5]. The English part of Wikipedia are displayed him substantially more. [Yuri Budanov] [Elza Kungaeva]

Staff neurological clinic Chita area admitted that a diagnosis of schizophrenia "by the 57-year-old retiree from the Ministry of Internal Affairs Anatoly Zagibalovu was wrong. Lawyers' Zabaykalskogo Rights Center conducted its own investigation of this history and found that in recognition of the ex-militiamen abnormal were interested law enforcement agencies : the Department of Public Prosecutions and the court Karymskogo region of Chita. Anatoly Zagibalov more than three years trying to understand the death of his son, Eugene summer of 2004, a power structures try the case "hush." <ref> http://www.sobkorr.ru/subjects/38/46BAC17F26399.html </ ref>

The criminal cases the Moscow City Court on August 13 upheld the verdict psychiatrist Dmitry Mukhin for illegal premises citizens in a psychiatric hospital is said to the Center of Public Information. " Mukhin sentenced to four years' imprisonment. <ref> Http://www.sobkorr.ru/news/46C16AF84BB55.html </ ref>

The criminal cases the Moscow City Court on August 13 upheld the verdict psychiatrist Dmitry Mukhin for illegal premises citizens in a psychiatric hospital is said to the Center of Public Information. " Mukhin sentenced to four years' imprisonment. <ref> Http://www.sobkorr.ru/news/46C16AF84BB55.html </ ref>

The criminal cases the Moscow City Court on August 13 upheld the verdict psychiatrist Dmitry Mukhin for illegal premises citizens in a psychiatric hospital is said to the Center of Public Information. " Mukhin sentenced to four years' imprisonment. <ref> Http://www.sobkorr.ru/news/46C16AF84BB55.html </ ref>

more

The criminal cases the Moscow City Court on August 13 upheld the verdict psychiatrist Dmitry Mukhin for illegal premises citizens in a psychiatric hospital is said to the Center of Public Information. " Mukhin sentenced to four years' imprisonment. <ref> Http://www.sobkorr.ru/news/46C16AF84BB55.html </ ref>