User talk:Komdori

Thanks..

..for the reformatting on my talk page. I was just too lazy to do it myself, so thanks. As for that star I have no idea what it is about, so I just decided to ignore it. Phonemonkey 19:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Liancourt Rocks

Hi, I thought I was explaining the reasons. The article cited does not say that South Korea subsidizes the livelihoods in order to justify their claim. It's common for countries to build housing and infrastructure, even provide living subsidies through tax credits and such, in outlying areas, so the previous wording sounded very biased to me. But whatever you or I think, the accusatory tone was not founded in the cited source, so should be out, don't you agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NIYet (talk • contribs) 20:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

It might be better to talk about this on the talk page for the article; certainly it's not an uncontroversial change, so it would be better to avoid edit warring. If you like, add a fact tag, I recall seeing something specific about habitation claims. There is a marked difference between attracting residents to an undisputed and habitable outlying area and paying someone to live on disputed uninhabitable rocks to satisfy some UN requirements. --Cheers, Komdori 20:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Sea of Japan

Hi, I made an edit a couple of weeks ago giving reference to the alternative names in the lead. The lead at that stage read (I copied and pasted but there were also wikilinks):

The Sea of Japan (occasionally referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.

With hindsight, I propose that it should instead have read:

The Sea of Japan (sometimes referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.

There appears to be consensus for this here, insofar as no editor has explained reservations with Kusunose's proposal, which I had assumed statistically would have happened if there were an objection, based on number of edits to the page and specifically in relation to the matter, and the amount of time that has elapsed since the proposal.

I haven't reverted your edit because I believe discussion should always come before editing, but would like to hear your view on the matter. BeL1EveR 23:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

report

Don't worry, even after my self revert, I was watching the watchlist for familiar immediate-report made by you or your friend. And I already left a comment there too. Good friend100 21:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Need Citation

need publicity source. [1] do you count number of each country's war? please prove it. Yearwaves3 21:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what your point is, could you please explain? --Cheers, Komdori 21:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

"numerous" and "several" mean. did you count how many number of each country's war? please prove it by publicity and trustworthy source.Yearwaves3 21:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, what is your point? Numerous and several both mean just that--more than one. Are you suggesting Goguryeo had only one conflict ever? --Cheers, Komdori 21:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. Yearwaves3 21:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but you have misunderstood the words. I suggest take a look at some of the many excellent online English dictionaries, such as Microsoft's. --Cheers, Komdori 21:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

don't you know "numerous" and "several" mean? your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. cleary you don't know about goguryoe history. you better do not edit goguryeo. you change with out "fact". don't do that. Yearwaves3 21:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

I have nothing against second language learners, but before illustrating your own ignorance further, please look up the words, read WP:OWN, and WP:CIVIL. --Cheers, Komdori 21:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)