Jump to content

Talk:Steve John Shepherd: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Private information
Line 9: Line 9:
== Private information ==
== Private information ==
I believe the statement in the "Personal life"-section to be of too private a nature and perhaps not suitable for Wikipedia. I also believe the statement to be poorly sourced. [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] (What is a reliable source?) says "Articles should be sourced to works [...] found in reliable publications with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Can www.people.co.uk be considered to meet theese criteria? Any thoughts? --[[User:Bensin|Bensin]] 01:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I believe the statement in the "Personal life"-section to be of too private a nature and perhaps not suitable for Wikipedia. I also believe the statement to be poorly sourced. [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources]] (What is a reliable source?) says "Articles should be sourced to works [...] found in reliable publications with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Can www.people.co.uk be considered to meet theese criteria? Any thoughts? --[[User:Bensin|Bensin]] 01:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

:I disagree. The whole point of a "Personal life" section is to provide info of a private nature. The info here is tame in comparison to other people in the public eye, check out [[Britney Spears#Personal life]] for one. Wikipedia allows "Personal Life" sections to be included in bio articles so long as the info is sourced. I think that if you are unhappy about this then the best thing to do is try to change the overall poilicy, because censoring personal information from articles will be futile in the long run, as it will only be reincluded eventually.

:The source from "The People" is just one source out of many that I came accross from a brief search. Shepherd's relationship with McCutcheon has been well documented: [[Evening Standard]] [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-80070733.html] [[The Mirror]] [ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20021222/ai_n12852778] [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20010318/ai_n14521582] [http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20051218/ai_n15939998] BBC and others [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1494947.stm] [http://www.htropic.ie/hotgoss.php?NID=166&archive=1] [[User:Gungadin|<font color="FF1493">Gung</font>]][[User_talk:Gungadin|<font color="0047AB">adin</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Gungadin|<font color="8B00FF">♦</font>]] 17:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:56, 5 November 2007

WikiProject iconBiography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Private information

I believe the statement in the "Personal life"-section to be of too private a nature and perhaps not suitable for Wikipedia. I also believe the statement to be poorly sourced. Wikipedia:Reliable sources (What is a reliable source?) says "Articles should be sourced to works [...] found in reliable publications with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Can www.people.co.uk be considered to meet theese criteria? Any thoughts? --Bensin 01:52, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The whole point of a "Personal life" section is to provide info of a private nature. The info here is tame in comparison to other people in the public eye, check out Britney Spears#Personal life for one. Wikipedia allows "Personal Life" sections to be included in bio articles so long as the info is sourced. I think that if you are unhappy about this then the best thing to do is try to change the overall poilicy, because censoring personal information from articles will be futile in the long run, as it will only be reincluded eventually.
The source from "The People" is just one source out of many that I came accross from a brief search. Shepherd's relationship with McCutcheon has been well documented: Evening Standard [1] The Mirror [ http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4161/is_20021222/ai_n12852778] [2] [3] BBC and others [4] [5] Gungadin 17:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]