User talk:Nousernamesleft/archive4: Difference between revisions
→Émile Lemoine: new section |
→The Elephant in the Room: new section |
||
Line 272: | Line 272: | ||
I don't think it's there yet. I'll ask some friends. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
I don't think it's there yet. I'll ask some friends. [[User:Ling.Nut|Ling.Nut]] ([[User talk:Ling.Nut|talk]]) 01:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
== The Elephant in the Room == |
|||
I'm curious if you can fill me in why [[The Elephant in the Room]] has been steadily upped in protection over time. I asked on the discussion page and never got an answer and it's only become more protected since my original inquiry; so I finally gave in and searched through the history to see which op fully locked down this album - your name came up. I'm hard-pressed to imagine why a single album merited this high level of attention to the point even registered editors (which I freely admit I'm not) would not be able to fix typos on their own. [[Special:Contributions/68.229.184.37|68.229.184.37]] ([[User talk:68.229.184.37|talk]]) 06:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:18, 24 March 2008
User:Nousernamesleft/Header User talk:Nousernamesleft/archive4/archivebox
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Nousernamesleft/archive4. |
Thanks, but...On The Elephant in the Room, you helped me and added a full protection. But could you change the sells of the album to 46,000 sales? Here's a ref: http://www.rapbasement.com/news/rick-ross/rick-ross-beats-out-snoop-doog-fat-joe-in-first-week-sales.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Y5nthon5a (talk • contribs) 19:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Criticism of weak GA for article: Green MarketingIt seems a bit ridiculous to even have considered as GA an article with such obvious flaws:
Where does one start? Plagiarism, Copyright Violation, Advertising, Empty Reference, Hearsay .... Was it granted GA because it looked nice? Did anybody even bother to read it? If read, did anyone consider and think about the content? Your tutorialA suggestion - you might want to mention gadgets, since that's an alternative (and easier) way to install some user scripts. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 15:04, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
My RfBI wanted to personally thank you, Nouser, for your support in my recent RfB. I am thankful and appreciative that you feel that I am worthy of the trust the community requires of its bureaucrats, and I hope to continue to behave in a way that maintains your trust in me and my actions. I have heard the community's voice that they require more of a presence at RfA's of prospective bureaucrats, and I will do my best over the near future to demonstrate such a presence and allow the community to see my philosophy and practices in action. I hope I can continue to count on your support when I decide to once again undergo an RfB. If you have any suggestions, comments, or constructive criticisms, please let me know via talkpage or e-mail. Thank you again. -- Avi (talk) 15:18, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Re: Haha
GA review of Donegal fiddle traditionI've reviewed the article and left notes on the talk page. I've put the nomination on hold for seven days to allow the issues to be addressed. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, here, or on the article talk page with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Ealdgyth | Talk 16:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Survivre Avec les LoupsI hate to mention it, but the redirect you created today was supposed to be Survivre Avec les Loups, not Suvivre Avec les Loups. (The former is the correct spelling.) -- 65.78.13.238 (talk) 06:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC) ...If you read this, Xinrui want to know if you still remember her from school. Dattebayo3... 2...1! 21:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC) WP:LOTDCongratulations on your recent successful WP:FL promotion. You may be interested in taking part in our experimental procedure for the selecting lists of the day and lists of the month at WP:LOTD.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 00:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC) KeewasseeRiana's request for bureaucratship
Maths competitionsAll the best and enjoy yourself. I won't be doing the GA review, since I have a policy of not doing re-reviews - since GA only has one reviewer, I think it's better to have a fresh set of eyes. Blnguyen (vote in the photo straw poll) 00:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC) Rollback is generally only for vandalism. Using it for good-faith edits isn't really within the boudaries of policy. I'm not criticizing you, just informing you that you should usually use the [Twinkle (AGF] button in the future. Nousernamesleftcopper, not wood 21:31, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
blocked editor requesting deleted article copies.I would not. Who is the blocked user? What are the articles? Who blocked him? I would ask the blocking admin and/or run it by WP:AN/I]]. Might be OK. I be a big mistake. Sorry I'm not more helpful. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC) On the other handContent is released under the GFDL. That probably does not terminate with deletion of the article. Still, I'd run it by AN/I. Cheers, Dlohcierekim 03:55, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC) RfA Thanks
AgingThanks for helping me! Could you tell me how you did it? Now that I've been shamed by the new admin, I will officially withdraw into my shell. :) Just kidding. bibliomaniac15 Midway upon life's journey... 23:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC) Émile LemoineHi Noun, I'll look at Émile Lemoine bit by bit, if that's OK. I'm a little busy. :-) I did see something that looked a little listy, which some would argue against (i'm not saying it's bad though). I also saw several other things that might need tweaking.. but it's time to prepare for class now... I'll drop comments here and there on the PR. later! Ling.Nut (talk) 00:34, 20 March 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the supportOh snap, the DEA is an admin
Ad Fair use of picturesYes I do know the use of copyrighted images on userpages is prohibited by WP:FAIR USE and I chose to abide by it. However, the Opera Software ASA would definitely NOT consider it an unfair use, which is IMO more important than WP guidelines. Jancikotuc (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
I don't think it's there yet. I'll ask some friends. Ling.Nut (talk) 01:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC) The Elephant in the RoomI'm curious if you can fill me in why The Elephant in the Room has been steadily upped in protection over time. I asked on the discussion page and never got an answer and it's only become more protected since my original inquiry; so I finally gave in and searched through the history to see which op fully locked down this album - your name came up. I'm hard-pressed to imagine why a single album merited this high level of attention to the point even registered editors (which I freely admit I'm not) would not be able to fix typos on their own. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 06:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |