User talk:Irate~enwiki

Policy

Any comments by my accuser will be removed as vandalism.--Jirate 16:05, 2005 Apr 10 == User:Theresa Knott ==

admin action. This woman should be banned.--Jirate 15:06, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Now going around bosting about it. Irate is currently on an 24 hour block for edit warring over where his comments should go on this page Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 15:14, 24 July 2005 (UTC) You not she still continues the fiction that I undid here contxt destroying edit. I did not. I was putting in an RFC against Knott. See [[1]]

--Jirate 15:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Just confirming what I said in my latest email. As soon as you calm down and agree to stop with the bad faiths rfcs etc I will unblock you. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 16:05, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

They are not bad faith. I beleive you hand others have broken the rules. Now stop hassling me, restore my RFC and reenable me.--Jirate 16:24, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

You still have not restored my editing and so continue to break the rules inorder to stop an RfC being started against you. Any vote by you against me is simply you abusing you position. You have attacked me by blocking me. You prevent me from starting an RFC against you. You should resign you admin ship immediatly it is not supposed to be used be people for there own ends. Anyone who places a link on a page inorder to check up on me is engaged in personal abuse. The problem is you don't like beingkept with in your rules.--Jirate 18:33, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

Oh, look, stop being so ridiculous. The 3 RfCs and the RfAr you started today were all utterly frivolous, as you well know. Let's be frank: you are about to be put in a position where admins can block you summarily for anything they judge to be a personal attack. You're not stupid, so I'm sure you appreciate that this means you face a simple choice. Either you A) continue to antagonise others as you have been doing today, and get blocked; or B) stop the personal attacks and stop firing off spurious RfC / RfArs, and be allowed to edit here. The choice is yours to make, but I'm sure we would all much rather not spend our time chasing around after you, and would infinitely prefer it if we could just get back to the simple joys of quietly editing encyclopedia articles. How about you make that possible, eh? — Matt Crypto 00:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Well I'd appreciate it if you'd with draw you provoctive lists. It is people who choose to chase after me, example being your watchlist.--Jirate 00:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

I've deleted User:Matt Crypto/list. — Matt Crypto 00:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

I will attempt to more subtle in future.--Jirate 01:09, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

People who need to be watched

Thing2 Still up to your old tricks hey Gerard. Protecting your mates. You personal attacks against me will be removed as soon as I am back online. as will ve VileTriga and the others.

DavidGerard go away, you gibbering fuckwit. Wikipedia is not chlorpromazine.

Thing2 I a gibbering fuckwqit hey. COmpared with you I am a genius.

Thing2 Though of course being as lacking in integrity as you. I imagine you clam to be one.

Thing2 So do you refuse to remove your attacks?

Thing2 This is of course going in my RFC apparently I have to have tried to resolve the problem, but obviosly you don't want to be solved.

Thing2 Wikipedia also isn't a bigger dick.

Thing2 You realy are unplasant aren't you. That little lot will be going in the log as well.

DavidGerard argh. how does one set a mask to /ignore an IP range?

Denelson83_IPA I don't think that's possible

DavidGerard irate is hopping around on dhcp being a PITA

Project2501a Dave2: it's not possible.

ambi2 DavidGerard: have them k-lined?

=-= Mode #wikipedia +b *!*Thing2@*.range217-44.btcentralplus.com by DavidGerard

=-= YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)

Thing2 I'm soory but Wikipedia requires me to try and solve disputes. But when it invloves talkingto people like you it';s not worth it.

--Jirate 13:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

He aint finished yet.

YOU (Thing2) have been booted from #wikipedia by DavidGerard (DavidGerard)

[INFO] You are banned from this channel.

--Jirate 13:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Threats by Thersa Knott

I've manually unblocked the autoblocker block, as it's clear you were experimenting rather than trying to evade a block. The 24 hour block I put in place expires at 16.04 today. If you try to edit between now and then you'll trip the autoblocker again and reset the block for another 24 hours.

If you make any personal attacks when you return or start any malicious rfcs or rfars you will be blocked again. Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 14:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

You'll note that this is one of the people I want to put an RFC in against. For there block in the first place, now using there admin powers to protect themselves and threatening me. This is a clear case of abusing admin powers and will be reported ASAP.--Jirate 14:34, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

Further more your should unblock me and resign your adminship, you are not fit to be incharge of anything.--Jirate 14:35, 25 July 2005 (UTC)

For reference, this was the statement that triggered the one week personal attack ban. Snowspinner 15:34, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Page protection

Your page has been protected for the remainder of your week ban, so as to make avoiding personal attacks that much easier. Snowspinner 14:50, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton

The article Charles Molyneux, 1st Earl of Sefton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article contains only a name and dates of birth & death. It is unreferenced. Article not further developed since its creation in early 2005.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2010 (UTC)