User talk:Carolmooredc: Difference between revisions
Revert to revision 442586417 dated 2011-08-01 23:09:36 by Gfoley4 using popups |
Shootbamboo (talk | contribs) →Thanks for the link: new section |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
''You have received this notice because your name is on [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' <!-- Template:FRS message --> [[User:RFC bot|RFC bot]] ([[User talk:RFC bot|talk]]) 01:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
''You have received this notice because your name is on [[Wikipedia:Feedback request service]]. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' <!-- Template:FRS message --> [[User:RFC bot|RFC bot]] ([[User talk:RFC bot|talk]]) 01:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Interesting. [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc#top|talk]]) 14:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
:Interesting. [[User:Carolmooredc|CarolMooreDC]] ([[User talk:Carolmooredc#top|talk]]) 14:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC) |
||
== Thanks for the link == |
|||
In the closed and collapsed discussion[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=442538864#JerryDavid89] I saw Zero said "Looking further back in the contribs (but only 3 days), this personal attack deserves a block by itself and illustrates the attitude which JerryDavid89 brings to Wikipedia. Please do something about it." This referenced the attack that helped motivate my ANI report,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive713&oldid=442611666#Personal_attacks.2C_bad-faith_and_slow_edit-warring] which didn't result in any sanctions. Any idea why? Was it worded poorly? Are we short on admins? Do you have to be an consistent personal attacker/rule breaker to get a ban around here? [[User:Shootbamboo|Shootbamboo]] ([[User talk:Shootbamboo|talk]]) 06:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:32, 2 August 2011
Please post comments about the content of a specific article on the Talk Page of that Article if it is relevant to all editors.
Green Line
|
|---|
Please comment on Talk:China
Remember that RFCs are part of Dispute Resolution and at times may take place in a heated environment. Please take a look at the relevant RFC page before responding and be sure that you are willing and able to enter that environment and contribute to making the discussion a calm and productive one focussed on the content issue at hand. See also Wikipedia:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:China. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.
You have received this notice because your name is on Wikipedia:Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page. RFC bot (talk) 01:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Interesting. CarolMooreDC (talk) 14:29, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the link
In the closed and collapsed discussion[1] I saw Zero said "Looking further back in the contribs (but only 3 days), this personal attack deserves a block by itself and illustrates the attitude which JerryDavid89 brings to Wikipedia. Please do something about it." This referenced the attack that helped motivate my ANI report,[2] which didn't result in any sanctions. Any idea why? Was it worded poorly? Are we short on admins? Do you have to be an consistent personal attacker/rule breaker to get a ban around here? Shootbamboo (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)