Jump to content

User:Alecmconroy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<div style="border:1px solid #a3bfb1; background:#222; width:99%; padding:4px; color: #eee;">
<div style="border:1px solid #a3bfb1; background:#222; width:99%; padding:4px; color: #eee;">
[[File:BurnOut.JPG|right|200px]]
[[File:BurnOut.JPG|right|200px]]
<span style="font-size: 300%"> The Inevitable Burnout... </span><span style="font-size: 150%"></span>
<span style="font-size: 300%"> The Inevitable EnWP Burnout... </span><span style="font-size: 150%"></span>




Line 12: Line 12:
* The lack of engagement and discussion in June 2011 elections shook my faith in the global movement.
* The lack of engagement and discussion in June 2011 elections shook my faith in the global movement.
* The admission from a 'trusted insider' that my communications are ineffective and largely ignored shook my faith in my ability to productively improve the large-scale movement.
* The admission from a 'trusted insider' that my communications are ineffective and largely ignored shook my faith in my ability to productively improve the large-scale movement.
* A July 2011 dispute about about content deletion of fair use material shook my faith our ability to embrace 'openness' to the extent needed.
* A dispute about deletion of fair use material shook my faith in our project's ability to embrace 'openness' to the extent needed.


; Chronic Causes
; Chronic Causes

Revision as of 17:43, 2 August 2011

THIS USER IS: TIRED


The Inevitable EnWP Burnout...


Acute Causes
  • The May 2010 image deletions really shook my confidence in some leaders.
  • The lack of engagement and discussion in June 2011 elections shook my faith in the global movement.
  • The admission from a 'trusted insider' that my communications are ineffective and largely ignored shook my faith in my ability to productively improve the large-scale movement.
  • A dispute about deletion of fair use material shook my faith in our project's ability to embrace 'openness' to the extent needed.
Chronic Causes
  • Any deletion of good-faith contributions is demoralizing and a little 'un-wiki'.
  • Instruction creep and an increase in 'because we said so' logic
  • In content disputes, the best revision doesn't win-- the most passionate faction's revision wins. Quality doesn't always improve over time.
  • Substantial edits involve Too much 'BS' time (edit disputes, etc) not enough 'authoring' time.
Insight and Predictions
  • Radical innovation is required to solve these problems.
  • WMF doesn't innovate rapidly or well.
  • Non-WMF services will outpace our own projects.
  • The cutting edge be distributed-wikis or cloud-wikis.
  • WMF will be forced to play technological 'catch up' for the foreseeable futurs.
Positions

I continue to strongly support the Wikimedia Foundation, the Wiki Movement, and EnWP and wish the organizations the best. I will continue to support their values in the future. Wikimedia is a good thing, worthy of our support. My stress-to-payoff ratio has gotten too high for major contribution of time.