User talk:Veinor

Please add any new sections to the bottom of the page, sign them at the end by typing ~~~~, and insert an appropriate header; see examples below for how to do that. If you don't do so, then your comment runs the risk of being ignored. I will reply to them here.

PSA Artwork

April 2007 I added "trivia" that is factually true about the origin of PSA's logo airplane, which I created. I would like to suggest that the addition be reinserted, and that any info you feel is self-promoting can be left out. I am no longer an illustrator, and you have mistakenly presumed I am trying to promote my work. Not at all so. Just trying to relate the true history of the logo, and the connection to the film "Pursuit of happyness." ~~~~

Deletion review for Paul Uppal

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Paul Uppal. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jttw (talk) 18:38, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages by size

Please see the new page Wikipedia:Database reports/Talk pages by size (to be updated weekly). This talk page ranks fifth, with 23252 kilobytes. Perhaps this will motivate greater efficiency in the use of kilobytes.
—Wavelength (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

What? Does this include archives or not? Because I have an incredibly difficult time believing that even with archives, my talk page takes up 23 megabytes. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 21:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

It probably does, but you might wish to ask at User talk:Svick.

—Wavelength (talk) 22:04, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Oh, it's counting the counts that I used to do. That'd do it. I don't think anything uses those anymore, so I should probably delete them. Veinor ^{(talk to me)} 22:10, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex

User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Davidcampaignteam/Iprex during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Flowanda | Talk 09:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Why hasn't Cherie Roberts' page been deleted?

Back on April 20, 2007, it was written that the result of the discussion about deleting the page was to delete and the name Veinor was by that. Obviously, that was over four years ago and the page is still up. Incidentally, this Cherie Roberts' page is nothing but an advertisement and definitely should be deleted. Please let me know something.TL36 (talk) 03:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

sampling an edit on another page Little&daws (talk) 13:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Archive box

I hope you don't mind, but I am fixing your archive box. The date format was mixed. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 17:59, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)