Jurisprudence of concepts: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m spelling |
m Remove unicode control characters (CHECKWIKI error 16) +general fixes using AWB (8535) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:RudolfvonIhering2. |
[[Image:RudolfvonIhering2.jpg|thumb|right|150px|Rudolf von Ihering, one of the juris philosophers of the jurisprudence of concepts]] |
||
The '''jurisprudence of concepts''' was the first ''sub-school'' of [[legal positivism]],<ref name="ARCOS">{{cite web|url=http://www.arcos.org.br/livros/hermeneutica-juridica/capitulo-iii-o-positivismo-normativista/3-a-jurisprudencia-dos-conceitos/|title=A Jurisprudência dos Conceitos|author=Costa, Alexandre Araújo|publisher=Arcos|accessdate=17 December 2011}}</ref><ref name="FDV">{{cite web|url=http://www.fdv.br/publicacoes/periodicos/revistadepoimentos/n7/6.pdf|title=A importância da Jurisprudência dos Conceitos para a Metodologia Jurídica|author=Pepino, Elsa Maria Lopes Ferreira; Graviorno, Gracimeri, Vieira Soeiro de Castro; Filgueira, Sofia Varejão| |
The '''jurisprudence of concepts''' was the first ''sub-school'' of [[legal positivism]],<ref name="ARCOS">{{cite web|url=http://www.arcos.org.br/livros/hermeneutica-juridica/capitulo-iii-o-positivismo-normativista/3-a-jurisprudencia-dos-conceitos/|title=A Jurisprudência dos Conceitos|author=Costa, Alexandre Araújo|publisher=Arcos|accessdate=17 December 2011}}</ref><ref name="FDV">{{cite web|url=http://www.fdv.br/publicacoes/periodicos/revistadepoimentos/n7/6.pdf|title=A importância da Jurisprudência dos Conceitos para a Metodologia Jurídica|author=Pepino, Elsa Maria Lopes Ferreira; Graviorno, Gracimeri, Vieira Soeiro de Castro; Filgueira, Sofia Varejão|publisher=Revista Depoimentos, da Faculdade de Direito de Vitória|accessdate=17 December 2011}}</ref> according to which, the written [[law]] must reflect [[concept]]s, when [[interpretation (philosophy)|interpreted]].<ref>that means that the interpretation of the words stated in the law must be guided by the scientific concepts that these words represent.</ref> Its main representatives were [[Rudolf von Ihering|Ihering]], [[Friedrich Carl von Savigny|Savigny]] and [[Georg Friedrich Puchta|Puchta]]. |
||
This school was, thus, the preceding trigger of the idea that law comes from a dogmatic source, imposition from man over man and not a ''natural'' consequence of other sciences or of metaphysical faith. |
This school was, thus, the preceding trigger of the idea that law comes from a dogmatic source, imposition from man over man and not a ''natural'' consequence of other sciences or of metaphysical faith. |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* formalism, search of rights in written law |
* formalism, search of rights in written law |
||
* systemisation |
* systemisation |
||
* search for justifying specific norm with basis from more generic ones<ref name="RSA">{{cite web|url=http://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/download/5/4|title=Evolução Histórica da Teoria Hermenêutica - do Formalismo do Século XVIII ao Pós-Positivismo|author=Rocha, Sérgio André| |
* search for justifying specific norm with basis from more generic ones.<ref name="RSA">{{cite web|url=http://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/LexHumana/article/download/5/4|title=Evolução Histórica da Teoria Hermenêutica - do Formalismo do Século XVIII ao Pós-Positivismo|author=Rocha, Sérgio André|year=2009|accessdate=25 January 2012}}</ref> |
||
So, according to this school, law should have prevailing sources based upon the legislative process, although needing to be proven by more inclusive ideas of a social sense. |
So, according to this school, law should have prevailing sources based upon the legislative process, although needing to be proven by more inclusive ideas of a social sense. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
* [[Jurisprudence of values]] |
* [[Jurisprudence of values]] |
||
* [[Jurisprudence of interests]] |
* [[Jurisprudence of interests]] |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== References == |
== References == |
||
{{Reflist}} |
{{Reflist}} |
||
⚫ | |||
<!-- == Note == |
<!-- == Note == |
||
Line 31: | Line 29: | ||
[[Category:Concepts]] |
[[Category:Concepts]] |
||
[[Category:Positivism]] |
[[Category:Positivism]] |
||
⚫ | |||
[[fr:Jurisprudence des concepts]] |
[[fr:Jurisprudence des concepts]] |
Revision as of 11:01, 8 November 2012
The jurisprudence of concepts was the first sub-school of legal positivism,[1][2] according to which, the written law must reflect concepts, when interpreted.[3] Its main representatives were Ihering, Savigny and Puchta.
This school was, thus, the preceding trigger of the idea that law comes from a dogmatic source, imposition from man over man and not a natural consequence of other sciences or of metaphysical faith.
Among the main characters of the jurisprudence of concepts are:
- formalism, search of rights in written law
- systemisation
- search for justifying specific norm with basis from more generic ones.[4]
So, according to this school, law should have prevailing sources based upon the legislative process, although needing to be proven by more inclusive ideas of a social sense.
See also
- Jurisprudence of values
- Jurisprudence of interests
- Philosophy of law
- Legal positivism
- Legal naturalism
- Hermeneutics
References
- ^ Costa, Alexandre Araújo. "A Jurisprudência dos Conceitos". Arcos. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
- ^ Pepino, Elsa Maria Lopes Ferreira; Graviorno, Gracimeri, Vieira Soeiro de Castro; Filgueira, Sofia Varejão. "A importância da Jurisprudência dos Conceitos para a Metodologia Jurídica" (PDF). Revista Depoimentos, da Faculdade de Direito de Vitória. Retrieved 17 December 2011.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ that means that the interpretation of the words stated in the law must be guided by the scientific concepts that these words represent.
- ^ Rocha, Sérgio André (2009). "Evolução Histórica da Teoria Hermenêutica - do Formalismo do Século XVIII ao Pós-Positivismo". Retrieved 25 January 2012.