Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction/Assessment: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Md gilbert (talk | contribs)
Initial creation of WP_HCI Assessment talk page.
 
Maee10 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Human Computer Interaction}}
{{WikiProject Human Computer Interaction}}

==Assessment Examples==
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Literature/Assessment#Quality_scale
Assessment for Literature: The grading scheme is well formatted and informational. For each grade it lists the Criteria, Reader's experience, Editing suggestions and gives an example of an article with that grade. I think the page can be formatted to be more organized, right now it just seems like a lot of lists with bullet points. Another aspect this page is missing, is a description of importance levels. I was able to find lists for the topics under each level, but wasn't able to find a description of why the articles were placed where they were. [[User:Maee10|Maee10]] ([[User talk:Maee10|talk]]) 20:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:12, 22 April 2014

WikiProject iconHuman–Computer Interaction Unassessed (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Assessment Examples

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Literature/Assessment#Quality_scale Assessment for Literature: The grading scheme is well formatted and informational. For each grade it lists the Criteria, Reader's experience, Editing suggestions and gives an example of an article with that grade. I think the page can be formatted to be more organized, right now it just seems like a lot of lists with bullet points. Another aspect this page is missing, is a description of importance levels. I was able to find lists for the topics under each level, but wasn't able to find a description of why the articles were placed where they were. Maee10 (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]