Jump to content

Boolean hierarchy: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
citations
m →‎Hardness: fix repeated citation
Line 65: Line 65:
== Hardness ==
== Hardness ==


Hardness for classes of the Boolean hierarchy can be proved by showing a reduction from a number of instances of an arbitrary [[NP-complete]] problem A. In particular, given a sequence {x<sub>1</sub>, ... x<sub>m</sub>} of instances of A such that x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A implies x<sub>i-1</sub> &isin; A, a reduction is required that produces an instance y such that y &isin; B if and only if the number of x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A is odd or even<cite name=Wagner87/>:
Hardness for classes of the Boolean hierarchy can be proved by showing a reduction from a number of instances of an arbitrary [[NP-complete]] problem A. In particular, given a sequence {x<sub>1</sub>, ... x<sub>m</sub>} of instances of A such that x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A implies x<sub>i-1</sub> &isin; A, a reduction is required that produces an instance y such that y &isin; B if and only if the number of x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A is odd or even<ref name=Wagner87 />:


* BH<sub>2k</sub>-hardness is proved if m=2k and the number of x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A is odd
* BH<sub>2k</sub>-hardness is proved if m=2k and the number of x<sub>i</sub> &isin; A is odd

Revision as of 12:36, 10 December 2014

The boolean hierarchy is the hierarchy of boolean combinations (intersection, union and complementation) of NP sets. Equivalently, the boolean hierarchy can be described as the class of boolean circuits over NP predicates. A collapse of the boolean hierarchy would imply a collapse of the polynomial hierarchy [1].

Formal definition

BH is defined as follows:[2]

  • BH1 is NP.
  • BH2k is the class of languages which are the intersection of a language in BH2k-1 and a language in coNP.
  • BH2k+1 is the class of languages which are the union of a language in BH2k and a language in NP.
  • BH is the union of the BHi

Derived classes

  • DP (Difference Polynomial Time) is BH2.[3]

Equivalent definitions

Defining the conjuction and the disjunction of classes as follows allows for more compact definitions. The conjunction of two classes contains the languages that are the intersection of a language of the first class and a language of the second class. Disjunction is defined in a similar way with the union in place of the intersection.

  • C ∧ D = { A ∩ B | A ∈ C   B ∈ D }
  • C ∨ D = { A ∪ B | A ∈ C   B ∈ D }

According to this definition, DP=NP ∧ coNP. The other classes of the Boolean hierarchy can be defined as follows.

The following equalities can be used as alternative definitions of the classes of the Boolean hierarchy[4]:

Alternatively[5], for every k ≥ 3:

Hardness

Hardness for classes of the Boolean hierarchy can be proved by showing a reduction from a number of instances of an arbitrary NP-complete problem A. In particular, given a sequence {x1, ... xm} of instances of A such that xi ∈ A implies xi-1 ∈ A, a reduction is required that produces an instance y such that y ∈ B if and only if the number of xi ∈ A is odd or even[4]:

  • BH2k-hardness is proved if m=2k and the number of xi ∈ A is odd
  • BH2k+1-hardness is proved if m=2k+1 and the number of xi ∈ A is even

Such reductions work for every fixed k. If such reductions exist for arbitrary k, the problem is hard for PNP[O(log n)].

References

  1. ^ Chang, R.; Kadin, J. (1996). "The Boolean Hierarchy and the Polynomial Hierarchy: A Closer Connection". SIAM J. Comput. 25 (25): 340–354. doi:10.1137/S0097539790178069.
  2. ^ http://complexity-zoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:B#bh
  3. ^ http://complexity-zoo.net/Complexity_Zoo:D#dp
  4. ^ a b Wagner, K. (1987). "More Complicated Questions About Maxima and Minima, and Some Closures of NP". Theoret. Comput. Sci. 51: 53–80. doi:10.1016/0304-3975(87)90049-1.
  5. ^ Riege, T.; Rothe, J. (2006). "Completeness in the Boolean Hierarchy: Exact-Four-Colorability, Minimal Graph Uncolorability, and Exact Domatic Number Problems - a Survey". J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 12 (5): 551–578.