Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freja Film

Freja Film

Freja Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable organization - PROD declined. Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent reliable sources. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - I agree that it seems like notability isn't really established. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 01:20, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• Delete - I endorsed the PROD as failing WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 03:10, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• No Not Delete Important cultural organisation for women in film in Sweden and an international contact center for women in film globally in the 1980's. Should be culturally preserved. Women's history should not be erased. Filmartiste 05:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Comment: I have deleted the following commentary which had been added to the main article[1], but it could be regarded as a misplaced contribution to this AfD debate: "In September 2015, this entry in Wikipedia is being debated about being deleted by a few individuals who if this does happen, do not think it is important to preserve the history of women in film which has been historically erased. The criteria for erasure is that the group can't be found in mechanical "search" engines, robots. ". AllyD (talk) 07:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Comment: also note, the same user has left a message on this AFDs talk page. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 08:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Comment - If that kind of extremely disruptive behavior happens again, I think going to administrators to give notice would be justified. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 08:32, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Comment yes that was a misplaced contribution to the AfD debate. It is not always easy to navigate Wikipedia and where the right things should go. RE: assumption made by Coffee withMarkets.Filmartiste 09:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
• Comment the entry now does have references to important historical organizations and women from this time and has been cross-referenced. The women's film movement in Sweden was important and wold recognized. Freja Film was part of this. Contributions for women in film culture attracted global attention. UNESCO organized a conference in 1981 for this purpose- International Feminist Film and Video Conference in Amsterdam, and Freja Film was designated the world contact organisation. Thanks for your consideration.Filmartiste 09:11, 11 September 2015 (UTC)