French polish: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:36, 29 February 2016

French polishing is a wood finishing technique that results in a very high gloss surface, with a deep colour and chatoyancy. French polishing consists of applying many thin coats of shellac dissolved in alcohol using a rubbing pad lubricated with oil. The rubbing pad is made of absorbent cotton or wool cloth wadding inside a square piece of fabric (usually soft cotton cloth) and is commonly referred to as a fad,^[1] also called a rubber,^[2] tampon,^[2] or muñeca, Spanish for "rag doll".^[3]

French polish is a process, not a material. The main material is shellac, although there are several other shellac-based finishes, not all of which class as French polishing.

The finish is considered by many to be a beautiful way to finish highly figured wood, but it is also recognised to be fragile. It is softer than modern varnishes and lacquers and is particularly sensitive to spills of water or alcohol, which often produce white cloudy marks. However, it is also simpler to repair than a damaged varnish finish, as patch repairs to French polish may be easily blended into an existing finish.

History

French polishing became prominent in the 18th century. In the Victorian era, French polishing was commonly used on mahogany and other expensive timbers. It was considered the best finish for fine furniture and string instruments such as pianos and guitars. The process was very labour intensive, and many manufacturers abandoned the technique around 1930, preferring the cheaper and quicker techniques of spray finishing nitrocellulose lacquer and abrasive buffing. In Britain, instead of abrasive buffing, a fad of pullover^{[clarification needed]} is used in much the same way as traditional French polishing. This slightly melts the sprayed surface and has the effect of filling the grain and burnishing at the same time to leave a 'French polished' look.

Another reason shellac fell from favour is its tendency to melt under low heat; for example, hot cups can leave marks on it. However, French polish is far more forgiving than any other finish in the sense that, unlike lacquers, it can be easily repaired.

Process

The process is lengthy and very repetitive. There are also many similar variations in schedule and technique. What is described here is one such schedule. The finish is obtained through a specific combination of different rubbing motions (generally circles and figure-eights), waiting for considerable time, building up layers of polish and then spiriting off any streaks left in the surface.

The fad is first used to put a thinned coat of shellac on, then thicker coats with small amounts of superfine pumice, a crushed volcanic glass. The pumice acts both as a fine abrasive and to fill the pores of open-grain woods. Each coat must be fully dry before the next application, to avoid lifting out the softened finish.

The 'fad' is mostly lubricated with an oil that is integrated into the overall finish.^[4] This helps to prevent the 'fad' from lifting previously applied layers of shellac. Typically, softer oils, such as mineral oil, will produce a glossier and less durable finish whereas harder oils, such as walnut oil and olive oil, will produce a more durable finish.

There are two main variations to French polishing. In one, the original or 'French Method',^[5] both shellac and abrasive are applied and worked together. In the 'British Method',^[6] shellac and abrasive are worked alternately.

Additives to the shellac mixture include sandarac (sap of an African cedar) and copal, sap of a South American tree. These and other additives combined with heat and light can make the finish tougher, by cross-linking the polymers and oils in the shellac.

The piece is usually finished off after leveling (1500 grit oil sanding), then light buffing with carnauba paste wax. Too much heat or pressure from buffing will melt off the shellac and result in a bare spot that must be refinished.^[3]

References

^ Sam Allen (1994). Classic Finishing Techniques. New York: Sterling Publishing. p. 42. ISBN 0-8069-0513-1.
^ ^a ^b Allen, p. 30
^ ^a ^b French polishing tutorial for guitars
^ Article by Chris Baylor on describing the process of French finish including a mention of the use of extra virgin olive oil as a 'fad' lubricant.
^ Allen, pp. 36–41
^ Allen, pp. 41–46

External links

French polishing in lutherie
French polishing tutorial for guitars
French Polishing and Enamelling, by Richard Bitmead, 1910, from Project Gutenberg
French polishing method, by M. Tutin, cabinetmaker
Top 10 French Polishing tips Terry Waters French Polishing
Top Polishing & Wood Care Tips, by M&S French Polisher

[1] Sam Allen (1994). Classic Finishing Techniques. New York: Sterling Publishing. p. 42. ISBN 0-8069-0513-1.

[Allen,_30-2] Allen, p. 30

[milburnguitars.com-3] French polishing tutorial for guitars

[4] Article by Chris Baylor on describing the process of French finish including a mention of the use of extra virgin olive oil as a 'fad' lubricant.

[5] Allen, pp. 36–41

[6] Allen, pp. 41–46

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ==History==
-French polishing became prominent in the 18th century. In the [[Victorian era]], French polishing was commonly used on [[mahogany]] and other expensive woods. It was considered the best finish for fine furniture and string instruments such as pianos and guitars. The process was very labour intensive, and many manufacturers abandoned the technique around 1930, preferring the cheaper and quicker techniques of [[spray finishing]] nitrocellulose [[lacquer]] and [[abrasive buffing]]. In Britain, instead of abrasive buffing, a fad of pullover{{clarify|date=November 2013}} is used in much the same way as traditional French polishing. This slightly melts the sprayed surface and has the effect of filling the grain and burnishing at the same time to leave a 'French polished' look.
+French polishing became prominent in the 18th century. In the [[Victorian era]], French polishing was commonly used on [[mahogany]] and other expensive timbers. It was considered the best finish for fine furniture and string instruments such as pianos and guitars. The process was very labour intensive, and many manufacturers abandoned the technique around 1930, preferring the cheaper and quicker techniques of [[spray finishing]] nitrocellulose [[lacquer]] and [[abrasive buffing]]. In Britain, instead of abrasive buffing, a fad of pullover{{clarify|date=November 2013}} is used in much the same way as traditional French polishing. This slightly melts the sprayed surface and has the effect of filling the grain and burnishing at the same time to leave a 'French polished' look.
 Another reason shellac fell from favour is its tendency to melt under low heat; for example, hot cups can leave marks on it. However, French polish is far more forgiving than any other finish in the sense that, unlike lacquers, it can be easily repaired.