Talk:Ohio "Heartbeat Bill": Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CurtisNeeley (talk | contribs) explained why I removed the six-week ban claim |
CurtisNeeley (talk | contribs) just explained why the six-week ban is wrong. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The fetal heartbeat is NOT generally found via external testing at six weeks and the claim this is a six week time-frame bill is dishonest. This law requires ONLY external testing for the heartbeat. Am. Sub. H. B. No. 493 As Concurred by the House Page 41 lines 1202,3. |
The fetal heartbeat is NOT generally found via external testing at six weeks and the claim this is a six week time-frame bill is dishonest. This law requires ONLY external testing for the heartbeat. Am. Sub. H. B. No. 493 As Concurred by the House Page 41 lines 1202,3.[[User:CurtisNeeley|CurtisNeeley]] ([[User talk:CurtisNeeley|talk]]) 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
. |
. |
||
Revision as of 19:50, 10 December 2016
The fetal heartbeat is NOT generally found via external testing at six weeks and the claim this is a six week time-frame bill is dishonest. This law requires ONLY external testing for the heartbeat. Am. Sub. H. B. No. 493 As Concurred by the House Page 41 lines 1202,3.CurtisNeeley (talk) 19:50, 10 December 2016 (UTC) .