Talk:Reservation in India: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:40, 11 January 2019

Reservation in India was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Skip to table of contents

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Politics C‑class Top‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in November 2012.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business C‑class Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Discrimination C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education C‑class Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Politics C‑class Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology C‑class Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WAP assignment

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Reservation in India. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Reservation in India at the Reference desk.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

latest advances in reservation syastem

the section in which you have shown the advances in reservation system of india . there must have some more changes took place after 1995 so i need to know that

The information which you have mentioned under title “Beneficiary groups of the reservation system” may miss guide the reader.

Actually reserve category person can apply to Open or Reserve category. But as per you sentences they can apply both (Open and reserve category) which is not real fact, please confirm with the writer of this article.

Advocacy groups etc as sources

Please note that it is rarely a good idea to use advocacy groups as sources for information except with regard to themselves. For this reason, I have just removed the BSP and Dalit News Bureau sources, and also the World Christian Federation source that in any event did not support the statement for which it was cited. - Sitush (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New reservations

Djsnape, please do not take this opportunity to make wholesale revisions to the page. The kind of edits you have been doing suffer from poor grammar, WP:POV and other problems. None of the existing content is invalidated by the new reservations. Please create a new section for the new reservations using the best sources you can find. We can revisit the rest of the content later. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that there is nothing called a "general caste". The new reservations are meant for economically backward sections irrespective of caste. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:44, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 Note that there is nothing called a "general caste". The new reservations are meant for ''economically backward sections irrespective of caste''. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 12:44, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
-== Replacement of old image with a new one which is more recent in term of the year of survey ==
-[[File:Caste and Community profiles of poverty line in India as per NSSO.jpg|thumb|Caste and Community profiles of poverty line in India as per NSSO]]
-[[File:Caste and Community of Profile People below povertyline in India.PNG|thumb|Caste and Community of Profile People below povertyline in India]]
-DOES IT NEEDS VOTING?
-[[User:Djsnape|Djsnape]] ([[User talk:Djsnape|talk]]) 10:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
-: No. That is fine. -- [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]] ([[User talk:Kautilya3|talk]]) 12:58, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
-: [[User:Kautilya3|Kautilya3]], So what should I do now? [[User:Djsnape|Djsnape]] ([[User talk:Djsnape|talk]]) 13:10, 11 January 2019 (UTC)